User talk:EVula
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
|---|
[edit] Image:EVILBastards.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:EVILBastards.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Arcayne (cast a spell) 20:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Meh, it probably took more time for you to list it for deletion than it did for me to just fix the problem with the license tag. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Feh, its a bad image that doesn't represent the actual subject; instead it represents an artists' rendering of what three tangential characters in the series look like. For clarity's sake, let's remember that the noted Sith characters of the franchise as Sidious, Maul, Dooku and Vader. Peripheral characters aren't as important. Seriusly, what was the problem with finding an image of Maul. It seems like those are, like, everywhere. How about Dooku or Sidious? How about Vader? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I like this one because it portrays three of the most significant Sith Lords of varying times in the Star Wars storyline. I do agree that Bane and Sadow aren't as immediately recognizable, but the article itself doesn't focus solely on the eras that Sidious, Maul, Dooku, or Vader are significant in; this way, we've got a single image (thereby keeping down the number of Fair Use images being used on the article) that serves as a general overview of the entire concept. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- With respect (and I do mean that), I think that labeling them the "most significant Sith Lords" is traipsing down the speculation trail - a trip that we don't need to be making. I think I could track down an image of Sidious and Vader from RotJ (maybe with a li'l bit of force lightning for added flavor) or Maul with double-sided light-saber that would work just as well. The image from the back of the gaming book is not the best we could find. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it could be that I've got that phrase in my mind because that's the exact caption used for that image. :) (I don't have the gaming book itself, but I know I've seen that image in one of the numerous books about Star Wars comics) I need to track that book down and get a copy, if only so that I can properly source the comment.
I also don't think the suggested replacement images would be as encyclopedic, as it would only illustrate a single character (each of whom is already illustrated in their article), but I definitely think you should offer suggestions in the IfD itself so everyone else can weigh in (Wookiepedia is a great source for such imagery).
And have no fear; though we disagree about this image, I'm not sitting and fuming over this, with thoughts like "Arcayne is such a jerk" running through my head. Just a friendly disagreement is all. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it could be that I've got that phrase in my mind because that's the exact caption used for that image. :) (I don't have the gaming book itself, but I know I've seen that image in one of the numerous books about Star Wars comics) I need to track that book down and get a copy, if only so that I can properly source the comment.
- With respect (and I do mean that), I think that labeling them the "most significant Sith Lords" is traipsing down the speculation trail - a trip that we don't need to be making. I think I could track down an image of Sidious and Vader from RotJ (maybe with a li'l bit of force lightning for added flavor) or Maul with double-sided light-saber that would work just as well. The image from the back of the gaming book is not the best we could find. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Might it be possible that you saw the image in the Sith article for Wookieepedia? You are a member there, so maybe osmosis took place. And I am glad twe are simply disagreeing. I could always stand to learn more about our image policy; it just seems like the image isn't good for us to use here. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I like this one because it portrays three of the most significant Sith Lords of varying times in the Star Wars storyline. I do agree that Bane and Sadow aren't as immediately recognizable, but the article itself doesn't focus solely on the eras that Sidious, Maul, Dooku, or Vader are significant in; this way, we've got a single image (thereby keeping down the number of Fair Use images being used on the article) that serves as a general overview of the entire concept. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Feh, its a bad image that doesn't represent the actual subject; instead it represents an artists' rendering of what three tangential characters in the series look like. For clarity's sake, let's remember that the noted Sith characters of the franchise as Sidious, Maul, Dooku and Vader. Peripheral characters aren't as important. Seriusly, what was the problem with finding an image of Maul. It seems like those are, like, everywhere. How about Dooku or Sidious? How about Vader? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Scorpion image
Thanks for changing it back. On a personal note, I hated that MK/DC picture. :) Beemer69 06:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was none too impressed with it. I'm hoping to standardize all the character images next week; I want to use the Armageddon versus imagery, so that everything will look the same. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mortal Kombat#Image standardization if you'd like to weigh in. EVula // talk // ☯ // 13:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Adminship
What are the requirements for applying to become an adminstrator?-- Tyw7, formerly Troop350 (talk) 19:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, there aren't any hard-written requirements. However, candidates are expected to show an understanding of Wikipedia's policies on deletion (either through properly tagging pages for speedy deletion or through participation in the Articles for Deletion process), an ability to (positively) resolve disputes (or, rather, be able to work through them without resorting to name-calling and personal attacks, as well as varying levels of familiarity with out image policies (specifically, our fair-use policies) and a bit of vandalism fighting (which can come from reporting vandals to WP:AIV. A healthy number of edits helps too (generally, anything below two thousand is unlikely to pass).
[edit] Re. For your sexy ass
Heh, thank you for the barnstar, EVula. :-) I'm glad to see that some users actually watchlisted Rhode Island. Sexy ass met its purpose. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 20:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- ...if only every sexy ass could meet its purpose... *sigh* EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Pedantry
Thank you for indulging my slightly disturbing need for conformity. In return, I've fixed a Category: Living People page. I shall now return to alphabetising my spice rack... Orpheus (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] E-mail
Sent. Acalamari 16:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Received. I'm about to head out to the after-party for Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Nashville, so I'll respond to it tomorrow or so. EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. Excellent. Acalamari 01:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Takes Nashville Images
Here's the cheat sheet for how to upload the images: User:Kaldari/WTN_cheatsheet. Kaldari (talk) 15:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome. I'm about to pull all the images off the camera right now; I hope to start uploading them to Commons sometime between today and Wednesday (depending on how many other things pop up).
- And those iPhone images look really good. I never would have guessed. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: For future reference
Hi, I know it's common practice, but I disagree with the usefulness of it, so I don't do it. As you could tell by looking at my talkpage, I don't enjoy getting templated spam messages; I've watchlisted the pages I've started and the messages are completely redundant. I used to leave notes to people when that fad started, but the comments the authors left were without fail about as useful as the first comment you left at the rfd discussion, so I just don't bother. But if I ever tag something you've started for deletion again, I'll let you know. - Bobet 12:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's still a good practice (common courtesy and all), but the purely selfish part of me is content with knowing that you'll at least inform me of my stuff. :D EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination
- Let the week-long cycle of question answering begin! ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 03:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ah...fun! :) Acalamari 16:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I'm disappointed...
You're still EVula! Balloonman (talk) 04:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm a version of EVula that obviously doesn't remember how much fun it was to answer a dozen questions. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm glad that your RfB appears to be passing with flying colors---it saves me the effort of having to research you (see my essay on how I vote).Balloonman (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Commons admin vote
Just wanted to drop you a line that I'm running for adminship on Commons: commons:Commons:Administrators/Requests_and_votes/Kaldari Kaldari (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for the heads up, that probably would have zipped right by me (very little actual wiki work while my RfB is going). EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Q18
Hi EVula - well, stick it to the man :) By "post", I meant bureaucrat, and "walk away" covers both recusing and not saying or doing anything, but you should how to appropriately answer it. Vishnava talk 18:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sweet, thanks. I hope to have the majority of my questions answered tonight... though it depends on how many clean clothes I have, and whether or not I remember to bring my laptop to the laundromat. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nice, candid answers :) No trace of diplomacy or mincing of words. Vishnava talk 23:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:WTN EVula 165.jpg
Image:WTN EVula 165.jpg looks a bit tilted to me. Might want to correct it, if that's the image we're going to use in the article. Kaldari (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Er, yeah, good call. I'll fix that at some point tonight. D'oh. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Question about single-user login
Dear EVula (as if you have nothing else to worry about...):
I'm considering signing up for single-user login, but my situation is a little complicated. I seek advice from someone who has done it before and understands how it works, and whom I trust. That's you. :)
The username "Shalom" is shared by three or four users across Wikimedia, myself included. I have more edits than the others, but I am not the oldest, and I don't want to ask other people to rename their accounts for me. That leaves two choices: (1) Forget it, who needs SUL anyway? It's a cool feature, but I survived this long without it. The main reason I'd like to have it is so that interwiki links could be attributed to me without my having to bother registering an account everywhere like you did. (2) Rename my username to something other than "Shalom."
That presents a couple of problems. First, I remember when Warlordjohncarter was renamed to User:John Carter it shut down the server for a few minutes because he had about 70,000 edits. I have about 22,000 edits plus another couple of thousand deleted edits, so I imagine renaming my account, and doing page-moves on my dozens of subpages, would cause a major headache for the servers and the bureucrat. Second, I have different accounts with different names all over the place. On Hebrew Wikisource I am still YechielMan (my old username here); on Hebrew Wikipedia I am שלום יחיאל; on Wikimedia Commons I am Shalom Yechiel; and on meta I am Shalom Hello. I'd need help from a steward who could go to all these wikis and do a pile of renames, if that's even possible. Asking local bureaucrats to do renames is more trouble than it's worth. (I could just abandon those accounts and let my SUL global account supersede them.)
Finally, I would have to choose whether to continue using a pseudonym - probably Shalom Yechiel - or to go with my real name, which is Yechiel Robinson. As I get more involved here, I like the idea of using my real name, and I have no reason to fear harmful consequences given the fact that my name and photo is already on my userpage for many months. But I'm not sure, and here too, friendly advice would be helpful.
I know this sounds really arcane, but I hope to stay here for awhile longer, and SUL could help me do it more effectively. Please reply on my talk page. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 22:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'll respond to this later tonight. Just wanted to make sure you didn't think I was blowing you off. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thank you spam
Hi there - thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed 69/10/3 yesterday. I will put the tools to good use and hopefully justify the confidence you had in me. Best wishes and good luck for your RfB! Fritzpoll (talk) 11:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 50
It may not be weekly, but Wikipedia Weekly has finally reached Episode 50! Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
- Have a comment about the episode? You can leave your comment right on the episode's page!
- Miss an episode? Catch up in the Wikipedia Weekly archives at wikipediaweekly.org!
- Know someone who would love Wikipedia Weekly? Tell them about it!
- Care to participate in a podcast? Sign up here!
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 00:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
[edit] Commons uploading program for Mac
You mentioned on my talk page that someone had written a bulk uploading program for Mac. Any more details on that? Kaldari (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I used Commonist; it's not Mac-specific, but it's done in Java, so it's actually platform-independent. Didn't have some of the Mac niceties, which makes it a bit obnoxious to deal with, but it certainly gets the job done. EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Random Question
How is an "I-can-do-it-all" stance counterproductive? (per Burn the Backlogs)
Oh, and best of luck on the RfB. 21655 ταλκ/01ҁ 18:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- It's more of an attitude that you (or whoever) is the only person that can do absolutely everything. Wikis are a collaboration, not an opportunity for "army of one" fans to work their magic. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:31, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Requested photo
Hello! I noticed that on your userpage you state that you are living in Nashville. Would you be willing to take and upload a photo of the Nashville Tennessee Temple? It would be much appreciated. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I can't make any guarantees about when I can take the picture, but I'd be more than happy to do so. I know exactly where it is, too; I pass it every once and a while. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thank you! Whenever you can take it is fine, I've searched Flickr and doubt I'll find a suitable photo there anytime soon. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Quoted
A little late, but I was busy fiddling with subpage names and collapse formats, all that jizz. Anyway, I've added you to my list of Favorite Quotes. I would have added the rabbit one, but it might jepordize your RfB. ;-) --Koji†Dude (C) 02:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thankfully it'll be done in a couple of days, so you can add it then. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Careful Consideration of Drowning Rabbits
Careful consideration is what brats need! <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 02:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, drowning rabbits without thinking beforehand (such as "what shall I drown them in?", "what types of rabbits will I be drowning?", etc) is something we should never deal with. All sorts of problems arise from that. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Alas, you forgot (Will the momma come back to the nest before all is said and done?) You gotta think of these things! (Neutral(JK))<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 06:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Congrats!
I'm jumping the gun here as you haven't been told yet, but I saw it on my watchlist and wanted to be the first to say Congrats on being promoted to Crat! Now stop reading this you bum and get to work :D. Congrats again! Dusticomplain/compliment 03:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it'd be pretty bad for me to just sit here and not do anything now that I've gone through all that work. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- So, are you interested in Admin Coaching? Dusticomplain/compliment 16:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Crat
Congratulations. :) — MaggotSyn 03:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] You are now a bureaucrat
Third time's the charm... I have just closed your RfB as successful and made you a bureaucrat. Congratulations! WjBscribe 03:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- This is excellent! Congratulations from me, EVula! I was proud to nominate you, and I am immensely pleased that you passed! Good luck! Acalamari 03:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congrats! You'll do great. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 03:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congrats. Keegantalk 03:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Many, many thanks everyone. Now, off to promote socks to 'crat! ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations. Now go promote some bots. ;) Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 05:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Concrats. Hahaha so clever on word play. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 05:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well done sir. Now, I need a rogue + sysop ------> User:SonOfPedro - :) Pedro : Chat 07:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Good stuff! :) Anthøny 10:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 10:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Excellent news!! Well done indeed, Ev :) Delighted it went through - yayy!! - Alison ❤ 10:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC) (now I can get all those rouge renamings done :D )
- Oh, and lolz @ your new userbox: "This user has been a bureaucrat for 1 day." - heh - Alison ❤ 10:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I think your promotion will be a particularly good move by the Wikipedia community. Congradulations good sir. ☯Ferdia O'Brien (T)/(C) 10:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Congrats. And if I may add to the silly suggestions, I think you should go close Giggy's RfA early as "WTF" ++Lar: t/c 10:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Well done! (And btw, no worries about the question - it was asked pretty late on, and wasn't the easiest of questions - good to know you'll be participating). Al Tally talk 11:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- EVula is
athe shit 'crat. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 14:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)- Support. I've been impressed by EVula's tact and - wait, am I too late? Tan | 39 14:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Contragulations, EVula! Good work ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel 15:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support. I've been impressed by EVula's tact and - wait, am I too late? Tan | 39 14:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- I hope you realize you have a golden opportunity here. Your support level in the community is at an all-time high. However, you have only a small window before people start hating you for doing your new job. I recommend this moment for rushing out and implementing ill-considered, radical chances to the RFA process. You know you want to. Friday (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Congrats. Your first duty is on June 5th, deciding on DHMO's RfA all on your own. I'm sure there will be no controversy over this, good way to get started :)) Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 16:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations. Just in time for jumping into the deep end. Agathoclea (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations EVula :). Sorry I missed the nom :(. Now stop lazing around and do some 'cratly duties! *teehee*¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I s'pose I'm too late too. Oh well, go out an' rename people an' stuff. SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 18:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Well done EVula, it just goes to show perseverance can be very successful. I wish you luck and I hope to see you around using the 'crat tools. Camaron | Chris (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
ConCRATulations on your successful RfB, EVula! :-) What, no new tools yet? Here are your squeegee, sponge and chalk! Use them wisely! Festive regards, Húsönd 22:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
yay 1 != 2 23:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- My heartiest congrats! Now you have a good excuse to tell your boss if he catches you. Vishnava talk 23:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congrats. Now change your mop icon to a crat icon! OhanaUnitedTalk page 00:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- My heartiest congrats! Now you have a good excuse to tell your boss if he catches you. Vishnava talk 23:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Congrats, well deserved! — Rlevse • Talk • 02:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, congrats! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations. Sorry to get my support in late this time, but you'll do a great job. MastCell Talk 16:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! spam!Antonio Lopez (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Ah, of course. EVula is just the sort of person who we need to be a 'crat. Excellent. hmwithτ 20:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Wikipedia:Upload
I've answered your post. I've also posted some links to traffic statistics for unprotected high-traffic pages from the sidebar menu.
The Transhumanist 03:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Just a note
To say "get well soon" to your best friend. Hope he or she gets better fast. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Many thanks. She is doing better, but I'm still concerned. I've made several offers to help take care of her even more (just a bit short of moving in with her); if she acquiesces, I'll be around all the less, but that just means I'll have an explosion of activity once she's healed up. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Same from me: best wishes + thoughts. You and him (/her) will get through it. Anthøny 16:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re AFD closure
Hey I'm cool about it. As long as the community are OK about me nominating things for deletion if at first inspection they appear to be non-notable, I don't have a problem with what the community does with them after that. -- Roleplayer (talk) 22:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Groovy, glad there were no hard feelings over it.
For what it's worth, I agree that stuff that appears non-notable should get chucked up on AfD. I may not be the entire community, but at least I am okay with it. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)- Cool. -- Roleplayer (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Heya
Could you jump on IRC for a second - I need two renames which are a tad irregular :) Cheers, Daniel (talk) 04:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can't at the moment; preoccupied by stuff related to my message in the header. :( EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] SUL
Hey EVula-
I am trying for unified login. Could you change my username to Ioscius? (my signature already reflects this, but the username is User:Josh Rocchio). Thanks! --Ioscius (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Courtesy Notification regarding my recall criteria
Hiya. Just a courtesy note to say I've named you as one of the editors that I would accept a request for recall from. There's nothing onerous about it, and you don't have to do anything. It's simply to let you know that as I have added myself to CAT:AOR I needed some unfussed criteria for recall, and I believe your judgement fits that criteria neatly. Thanks! Pedro : Chat 10:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm honored, but I'd be surprised if I ever needed to execute this ability. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 13:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Thank you so much for changing my username! I really appreciate it. N-k 02:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Delete my former account
Hey ! Could you delete my former account, Jordangirardin ? Thank you !! Jordan Girardin, 07:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

