Wikipedia:WikiProject Engineering/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Engineering Navigation
Main page | Discussions | Project templates | Assessment | Portal |
Engineering
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 3 1 5
A 1 1
Good article GA 2 1 3
B 10 6 8 1 1 26
Start 2 11 17 10 4 44
Stub 1 5 314 5 325
List 29 29
Assessed 12 22 34 354 11 433
Total 12 22 34 354 11 433

Welcome to the assessment page for WikiProject Engineering.

Contents

[edit] FAQs

What is the purpose of article assessments? 
The assessment system allows a WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles in its subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content.
Are these ratings official? 
Not really; these ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project, and usually do not imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
Who can assess articles? 
In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, the "GA" and "FA" labels should only be used on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as good articles or featured articles, respectively. Individual WikiProjects may also have more formal procedures for rating an article, and please note that the WikiProject bears ultimate responsibility for resolving disputes.
How do I assess an article? 
Consult the quality scale below; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, set the class parameter in the WikiProject banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use |class=B in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless are currently designated as such.
Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do? 
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the article's talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
Feel free to change it—within reason—if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the WikiProject as a whole can discuss the issue and come to a consensus as to the best rating.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if the article is within this project's scope but doesn't have a project banner on its talk page? 
Due to the large number of articles we cover, not all articles within our scope can be tagged. However you can help increase the number of tagged articles by tagging the talk page of any untagged articles within our scope you come across with {{Engineering}}.

[edit] How to rate articles

Any member of Wikiproject Engineering are invited to rate articles for the project. Articles with unassessed quality can be found at Category:Unassessed-Class Engineering articles and articles with unassessed importance ratings can be found at Category:Unassessed-importance Engineering articles

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in any of the project banners found on article's talk page:

For example adding {{Engineering|class=B|importance=mid}} produces:

WikiProject Engineering This article is part of WikiProject Engineering, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, join the project, visit the project portal, and contribute to the project discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance.
{{Engineering| ... | class=??? | importance=??? ...}} is the general template.
The following is a list of parameters for different quality ratings and importance ratings
Featured article FA
A
Good article GA
B
Start
Stub
List

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:


Template
Disambig
Category
Redirect
Image
NA
Portal

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:


Top
High
Mid
Low

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

[edit] Quality scale

This table is transcluded here, and is identical to the one at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment.

Article progress grading scheme [  v • d • e  ]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}		 Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
Featured list FL
{{FL-Class}}		 Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A
{{A-Class}}		 Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
Good article GA
{{GA-Class}}		 The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}		 Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}		 The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}		 The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)


[edit] Importance scale

Article importance grading scheme [  v • d • e  ]
Label Criteria Examples
Top
{{Top-Class}}		 Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for articles that have achieved international notability within its subject or field.
High
{{High-Class}}		 Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent.
Mid
{{Mid-Class}}		 Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area.
Low
{{Low-Class}}		 Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  • (Your entry here)

[edit] Assessments

Use this section for assessment discussions and comments:

[edit] Log

Archive This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.


[edit] June 8, 2008

[edit] June 4, 2008

  • Madman Muntz reassessed from GA-Class (No-Class) to FA-Class (No-Class)

[edit] June 1, 2008

[edit] May 29, 2008

[edit] May 25, 2008

[edit] May 21, 2008

[edit] May 18, 2008

[edit] May 14, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] May 12, 2008

[edit] May 6, 2008

[edit] April 22, 2008

[edit] April 16, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] April 7, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] April 3, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 31, 2008

[edit] March 27, 2008

[edit] March 22, 2008

[edit] March 17, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 14, 2008

[edit] March 10, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] March 7, 2008

[edit] March 2, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 26, 2008

[edit] February 22, 2008

[edit] February 17, 2008

[edit] February 13, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 9, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 5, 2008

(No changes today)

[edit] February 3, 2008

[edit] February 1, 2008

[edit] January 25, 2008

[edit] January 21, 2008