User talk:Kirill Lokshin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) and add comments on a new topic in a new section.
  • I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
  • Threads older than five days are automatically archived.
  • Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are always welcome!

Archives

I • II • III • IV • V • VI • VII • VIII
I am an administrator open to recall. To request this, please start a request for comment; if the consensus there is that my conduct has been unbecoming of an administrator, I will resign.

Contents

[edit] This and that

Hi Kirill: May I trouble you please to populate Worklist C as T&A08 when you've got the time? I've put the new worklist on the drive page but left it commented out. Many thanks in advance :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 05:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Kirill :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 23:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Another measured Lokshinism in Milhist talk: "possibly interesting indication" :))) --ROGER DAVIES talk 06:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Heh. ;-) Kirill (prof) 12:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 23 2 June 2008 About the Signpost
Board elections open WikiWorld: "Facial Hair" 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] First Edit

HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing Kirill Lokshin a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Idontknow610TM 15:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

С днем рождения" --ROGER DAVIES talk 06:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Hi Kirill, which would be the procedure to demote an A-class article which obviously does not meet the A-class criteria any more and may not even fall within our scope? Cheers, --Eurocopter (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I was thinking of this, but if I put it under another AR the Milhist banner automatically changes from A-class to Start-class. Is this the first time an A-class article would undergo an A-class review? --Eurocopter (talk) 19:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Is it worth amending the ACR instructions to explicitly deal with this? Or is that WP:BEANS? --ROGER DAVIES talk 06:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Given the relative rarity of re-reviews, and the fact that this is a technical issue with the template code that really has nothing to do with how the review should work, I wouldn't think that mentioning it explicitly is needed. We can just explain it on a case-by-case basis if it comes up again. Kirill (prof) 12:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Military, er, things

Sorry for the delayed response but I was traveling. I'll respond shortly on my talk page. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Military history WikiProject!

Thanks for the welcome note. I will try my best to contribute to the prjt -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 14:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ask first

No reason to nominate something for MFD when I offered to take it offline by request. PouponOnToast (talk) 14:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)