User:PalestineRemembered

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Original Barnstar
This Barnstar is hereby rewarded to you for your hard work in editing biased articles and yout tolerance with the folks at Wikipedia Ssd175 06:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
The Purple Barnstar
For surviving the totally uncalled for attempts at impugning your character and continuing your excellent contributions to the project. Italiavivi 21:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
The History Barnstar
I don't get this whole barnstar thing ... but I've now spent hours reading up on the mess you have been involved in, so here's a token of admiration for your tireless yet futile attempts to rid Wikipedia of its anti-Palestinian bias. --Servant Saber 22:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For defending Wikipedia from being used as an Israeli public relations tool against Palestine. Luqman Skye (talk) 09:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sand-box pages

  • PR Cheating Editors - there are a number of editors I'm sure are deliberately cheating. Another editor keeps comments from me on his UserPage (examples all factual and mostly unarguable, I don't know why he does it or is allowed to do it). I am not retaliating at his apparent attempt at denying me AGF, but if he can do something for trivial "content dispute" reasons, I'm sure I should be able to do the same for systematic, damaging flaws that the project seems currently unable to control. Examples of cheating include removing good information on fraudulent grounds, inserting false information (though this is less common that the former) and harassing people trying to act in good faith at "disciplinaries". Unfortunately, I dare not list examples of the last group for fear that those few people left prepared to speak out are further harassed. There are other examples of cheating. The atmosphere of impunity is startling - in a few cases, it's even possible to discern people knowingly encouraging or colluding with it. There are many, many cases of people aggressively defending known or suspected cheats. I should add that I've had an immense amount of trouble in here - but only one (patently malicious) allegation and perma-blocking concerned my personal integrity.
  • PR - Kendrick7 - all correspondence with mentor Kendrick7.
  • PR - Zscout370 - all correspondence with mentor Zscout370.
  • PR - Geni - nearly all correspondence with mentor Geni.
  • PR - Various - some other bits and pieces about mentorship.
  • HG - Clarify Jenin
  • PR - House Demolition in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
  • PR - Battle of Jenin - Various
  • PR - Saeb Erekat - Did he lie?
  • PR various - Edits To Do
  • Aaronshavit - Zionism and racism allegations Racist statements from Israel, some disputed.
  • PR Block History - boring and currently incomplete. Some/many of my blocks are patently collusive, vindictive and uncalled for. In some cases I have appealed successfully, in most cases I don't appeal.
  • PR Original Research - obvious common sense is regularily dismissed as "Original Research", and of course, if it's included in articles, that's what it is. But in many other cases, evidence that is necessary for understanding a situation, and clearly not "surprising" in any way, is rejected as WP:OR for entirely POV reasons (it's one of the milder forms of obstruction and cheating). This section created in order to prove that assertions I make supporting use of sources is based on 'common sense'.