User:PalestineRemembered/MentorshipVarious

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Page for assorted bits "related to Mentorship"

I trust the allegation of edit-warring was a mistake. This is not something I've ever done, not at these diffs nor anywhere else.
And the "revert-warring" allegation must fall at the same hurdle - since in every case, my proposed edits have either stuck or been taken up by others.
  • Operation Defensive Shield here and here there are two major points at issue. Examine the upper paragraph - I defy anyone to claim my prefered version isn't a lot better than the other (and others think the same). The lower paragraph is partly my work, it's been improved and extended by others and inserted by them - it's both good information and vital to an NPOV, otherwise we have only the official statements of the perpetrator. And it's from pro-Israel sources same as what are there already!
  • "Rage Boy" - a POV editor has inserted weasel words, I'm re-inserting the words of the source. There are further edits of this article, nobody objects to what I've done.
  • Deir Yassin - my edit has survived 6 subsequent edits (including 3 editors who probably disapprove of much that I do) with no objections. PRtalk 16:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Questions for concerned persons

  1. "Is personal integrity a requirement to be an editor of Wikipedia?"
  2. "Is it realistic to decide what is Content Dispute, and what are straightforward falsehoods?"
  3. "Should egregious examples of trickery, inserting falsehoods etc, be grounds for mentorship or other sanctions?" (Assume for the moment that abusive sock-puppetry is a different offense).
  4. "Assuming personal integrity is a requirement, who in the project is best placed to decide when it has been breached and how should breaches be brought to their attention?" PRtalk 16:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Which of these is NPOV?

Neither of these versions is really fit to be in articles, but to my mind one of them is clearly better than the other. PRtalk 16:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Paragraph A:

Paragraph B: