User talk:Giggy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Make it better; do an FA review. (already have?)

/Archive (current)

Contents

[edit] Brisbane meetup invitation

Riverside Precinct Brisbane Meetup
Next: In Discussion
Last: February 10, 2008
This box: view • talk • edit

Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!

Automated message delivered by Giggabot (stop!) to Wikipedians in Queensland and known Brisbaneites, at 03:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC).

[edit] ID RfC volunteers

Hi, Giggy. Thanks for signing my talk page. I may not have time to contribute much in the next few days, so please feel free to start in on things if you're so inclined. Gnixon (talk) 22:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I think I'll wait and observe from the sidelines a bit first. giggy (:O) 01:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Just a heads up that I've started the discussion at User talk:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC with ideas for a basis to formulate the RfC. We also must try to resolve the dispute and as a first step my suggestion is developing guidelines or procedures aimed improving behaviour from now on, so that the desired outcomes can be achieved amicably. Your assistance and comments will be much appreciated. . . dave souza, talk 14:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. giggy (:O) 08:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Facebook

Thanks for the help; however, I am trying to focus on working on only one article at a time these days (I haven't done major article work in the past week or two at all.) I still hope to bring the article to FAC again one day, which shouldn't be too far from now, but it needs a lot of work so I will do it when the article(s) that I am currently working on are done. Gary King (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, perhaps I will watchlist the page and pitch in whenever I can. I don't know how interested you are in the article, however; I can help out without becoming too attached to it. My problem before was I was working on too many articles at the same time, so I'm trying to cut back now. Gary King (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm not overly interested (I don't use it and have no incentive), just was offering to help if you were going to. giggy (:O) 23:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I accept

Thanks much for the offer. What do you want me to do about the request I put in today at WP:ACOACH? You're welcome to sign your name if you want, or I can remove it. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 00:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

I dunno... it's so red-tapeish. Go ahead and remove it if you like. I'll whip something up soon. giggy (:O) 00:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry to bug you

But I left you responses to your comments in the Alleyway FA proposal. I'm genuinely a bit confused by what you'd have rather seen there for those lines to be more direct and without confusion. :\ Anyway, thanks for you time.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, no, not a problem... really sorry, I forgot to come back to that one - rest assured I didn't deliberately ignore it! You did the right thing by coming here. :) giggy (:O) 02:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] WP:GAN

I'm thinking about fixing up an article I've worked on before and nominating it for GA, even if it doesn't pass I'm still interested in getting an outlook of what needs to be done. But, the backlog at WP:GAN scares me. Since you know more about it than I do, do you think it'd even be worth the time? Or would it just be put 'on hold' for 6 weeks and come back to haunt me once I've lost interest?--Koji†Dude (C) 02:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

For a start, the cleanup banner up to means it fails WP:QFC. But that can be removed... Putting that aside, without any real world information (reception and development) it has no chance of passing GA. giggy (:O) 02:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)