Wikipedia talk:Gaming Collaboration of the week
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Previous discussions:
Contents |
[edit] Micromanagement (computer gaming)
Has anyone else even looked at this article? There's been practically bugger all work done on it all week. Seriously, what was the point of voting it to be the GCOTW if no-ones even gonna touch it? It's gonna be one hell of an embarrassing before and after comparison! The Kinslayer 12:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, we've had bad nominees before. The main problem is that not enough people actually nominate articles, so sometimes there are no good candidates and we end up with something like this. JACOPLANE • 2007-01-26 19:21
[edit] GCOTW a big letdown this week
This week's Wikipedia:Gaming Collaboration of the week was Prima Games. It's been rather a poor show, to be honest, very little activity. Appreciate any help others can offer in improving what is currently a rather shabby article. Thanks, --Oscarthecat 23:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tie again
Since there is a tie again, I'll let the voting period continue until tomorrow. If nobody votes by then, Nintendo Power will be selected. JACOPLANE • 2007-04-16 21:08
- Ok I' selecting Worms as the next GCOTW, since it has 5 votes, against 3 for Nintendo Power. JACOPLANE • 2007-04-17 15:28
- Perhaps Nintendo Power could be next? That would be a good idea in my opinion. RobJ1981 05:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Activity?
So is this department dead now or what? DarkSaber2k 11:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Read this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/archive27#Survey:_end_the_GCOTW.3F.3F - X201 11:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No longer working?
So, is Gaming Collaboration of the week now nonfunctional? As is, no one working on it, or something else?
How can it be brought back to work? Dumoren (talk) 05:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- You'll be better of asking that question at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games Not many come around here these days, hence the reason for it being would up. There have been a number of proposals put forward and agreed upon but it still lacks the the critical mass of people needed to get them up and running. - X201 (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

