User talk:William Pietri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived to User talk:William Pietri/Archive 05. Sections without timestamps are not archived. An archive index is available here. |
 Archives |
Contents |
[edit] Loved your analogy...
...here. I'll remember that, thanks! J Milburn (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Kind of you to say so. William Pietri (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:JzG
Nice work! --John (talk) 08:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. With that much history, it takes a while, and there were some heart-stopping pauses. But it seems to have worked, and nothing caught on fire. That I know of, anyhow. :-) -- William Pietri (talk) 08:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kickin' Brass
Hi, I was the creator of the Kickin' Brass artice. The page said to contact an admin about getting a copy of the page sent as a an email. Is there any way to get it sent to dcs152@msstate.edu for reference? We're working on our own webpage and need all that info. Thanks, Dcs152 (talk) 17:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sent! If you need further help, don't hesitate to ask. William Pietri (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portable games
They're White, round, cold, and wet and this is their target! LOL! -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk
- Excellent. Hooray for snowballs! William Pietri (talk) 16:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
You are seeing this message, because you participated in' Third Opinion' in [1] Could you please have a look at the discussion again and give your opinion as to whether this edit[2] is valid. thanks Ajjay (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] NTWW
I'd like to draw your attention to Wikipedia:NotTheWikipediaWeekly, a ~weekly Skypecast half-way between serious topics and casual chat. I'd love to see you join one of the forthcoming sessions. Dorftrottel (ask) 01:14, April 15, 2008
[edit] Simon Wessely
Hi, Are you in some way connected with the extraordinary entry for "Professor Simon Wessely"? He is a hugely controversial figure in the ME/CFS community and this is not reflected in the article. His entry is like something you would read in North Korea or China eulogising a local government official. The insurance company UNUM, for whom he works, describes him as "someone who does not shy away from controversy." This is not reflected in his entry. This entry is completely contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia. Shame on you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.74.1 (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Shame on me? Come now. I don't think I've ever edited the article, although I did comment on the talk page in 2005 or so. If you think the article should be fixed, then find reliable sources so that others can verify the information you would like to insert. Perhaps read over our guidelines for biographies of living persons. And then go to it! That's how the other 2.2 million articles got made, and his is no exception.
- Alternatively, if that seems too constraining, then there is lots more internet on which you can publish personal opinions.
- Either way, good luck! -- William Pietri (talk) 04:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Herbalife discussion
just wanted to tell you how impressed I am after reading the discussión page of herbalife. I see you have invested a lot of patience, brains and time to keep the article NPOV back in 2006. I would have gone crazy with those distributors edits. It happened to me in the spanish wiki on other articles. I hope you keep contributing to the wiki, as you must be gifted to handle this kind of situations.Jsgbrl (talk) 03:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's very nice of you to say so. Indeed, they had me at the end of my rope for a while, but another editor, A.B. was good enough to step in to take over. Thanks for the kind words! William Pietri (talk) 05:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
