User talk:TheBlazikenMaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is a talk page discussing anything relevant to what I'm doing on Wikipedia, if you want to discuss something personal, have questions about me, please contact my YouTube account. Everything irrelevant about what I'm doing on Wikipedia WILL be removed without notice. |
Click here for archive index.
Contents |
[edit] Expelled
- Could you please add Expelled: No Intelligence allowed to the List of 2008 films page: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_in_film>. Thanks. 69.215.156.197 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Image warnings
For the most part, they're not very informative, but they do help if some editor removes an image for a bad reason. Also, the image warning I just got was wrong -- there was nothing wrong with the poster image for 30 Days of Night, so I don't know why I got it. Thanks for the heads-up about that, though... maybe I'll consider usage down the road. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] electrical staircase
Can someone please make this redirect for me, because I'm clueless about what the proper term is. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 09:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I believe the word you are looking for is escalator. I don't know if a redirect would be in order here, however. -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 09:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Prison Break episodes
Hi. I want you just to know that I support the merge of the episodes. Maybe it's better if we create 3 articles, one for each season, instead of 1, so we keep as much information as possible but at the end we trim these huge plot descriptions. The vast majority contains only two lines of real-world information. If you go and do it, I'll support you. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: FAs
To be honest, and I know this will be sound really flippant, I just don't care. I already list my FAs on my userpage without being so egostistical to also include them in my userboxes or categorize myself as such. Alientraveller (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jafar (Aladdin)
I agree that the article needs an image, but do you believe we can upload a better one other than a VHS/DVD cover? Best pic I could find was this. Please reply on your talk page, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think this discussion would be better suited on Jafar's talk page. But I agree the VHS cover kinda sucks, I like that image, if you want to upload it go for it. If you can make it fair use. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I don't care for it that much. Just expressing my thoughts here. Though if I ever see a better one, I *might* set it up ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikicookie
- No, it's not a barnstar. But, many users put them with their barnstars.--LAAFan 17:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- yes, it's like a barnstar.--LAAFan 18:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Cookies, smiles, etc. promote WikiLove, while barnstars are strictly on merit, except for a few (ex. Signature barnstar) While the cookie I gave is for your constructive edits, it is not a barnstar. It is instead a little thank you for your work. Barnstars are harder to get than cookies or smiles, and mostly for major contributions to articles.--LAAFan 19:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Really, you haven't gotten one? I've looked at your edits, and you deserve one. If you want to stay online, I will whip one up for you soon.--LAAFan 19:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your first barnstar
 |
The Minor Barnstar | |
| I award this Minor Barnstar to TheBlazikenMaster for your many constructive edits that go unnoticed. LAAFan 19:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] I've been working my ass off archiving stuff.
But I'm not done yet. I still have to put disclaimers to the talk pages. That will take a while. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- It's done. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Family Guy stuff
Hey, do you think you could keep an eye on the articles for me? You do a great job already, but I'm heading off on a Wikibreak shortly, and I was wondering if you could keep an eye on them for me when I'm away? Cheers. Qst (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I Take Thee Quagmire edits
Look, if you're going to complain about the "encyclopedic format" then at least rewrite your sections so they're understandable instead of just taking out the bullets please? Because when I first looked at it, it looks like thats exactly what happened, which is why I put them back in. The entire cultural reference section on the page I edited is darn near the most kludged section I've seen in a while. I won't edit any more FG pages because I apparently don't do it right, but if you're so worried about that section being formatted like an encyclopedia then modify it so it is, please. Don't just do sentence after sentence after sentence that doesn't make sense in a paragraph like that. My $0.02. →ClarkCTTalk @ 04:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm just saying, if bulleted lists don't work for you (and the other regular editors of FG), then reword the paragraphs where the bullets have been removed so it doesn't just look exactly like you removed the bullets and added a few "also"s. That's what it looked like to me, so thinking someone had just done that without reason I put the bullets back in. As I said, I won't edit any more FG pages, I'll stick to ones I regularly edit.
- And just as an FYI, I absolutely abhor when people use snide and sarcastic remarks in an edit summary. "God, will the changing into non-encylopedic format ever end?" is to me a horrible summary, as well as being horribly demeaning to the person who makes the edits. If you had said something more along the lines of "Reverted bullet list to encyclopedic format" I never would've started this discussion. If you had done that to someone who was new and just trying to do what they thought was right you probably would've made them leave wikipedia for good. This may be "teh interweb" and such, but not everyone is a vandal trying to piss you off. Some people are just trying to do well here and you make it seem like its the worst offense in the world to edit a page. Isn't that the point of Wikipedia? I totally understand the concept of trying to keep uniformity, I have the same problem with some of the articles I work on, but I also make my edit summaries meaningful, not just sarcastic. →ClarkCTTalk @ 14:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Movie knowledge
Sorry for the belated response. I think I know what I do about movies because I've done a bit of research for Wikipedia articles. I haven't just found online articles that talk about films; I've used subscription-only databases to find coverage from newspapers, magazines, and journals. I've actually been reading some film journal articles since I want to write a pretty hefty "Critical analysis" section for Fight Club. I guess in my research, I just see trends like how a film's release is not guaranteed until it actually begins production. I've kept up with future films and seen how they collapse for a wide variety of reasons. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 01:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
