Talk:The Superman/Aquaman Hour of Adventure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TV This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
WikiProject Comics This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Superman/Aquaman Hour of Adventure article.

Article policies

[edit] Superman info

Even if the Superman segments were recycled, I think the cast information at the very least needs to be added in here. Rhindle The Red 13:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilinking of character names

All of the various super heroes are Wikilinked when they first come up in the text, but some—and only some—are also so in the "Guest stars" voice actor list. In the latter location either they should all be linked in or none of them (yes, I understand that there is one character there who is not mentioned in the main text, and he therefore should remain linked there regardless of the decision on the others). Given the distance between this list and the main text, I would not object to having them linked in here as well as above, and hence merely throw the question open to discussion, but I do find the current inconsistency to be unacceptable. Ted Watson (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I was "bold" and unlinked all but Kairo, I think the list is close enough to the lead paragraph to be redundant. — TAnthonyTalk 21:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough. I did mean to indicate that I was open to going either way with it, but on rereading me just now, I'd have to say that I—quite inadvertently, mind you—implied a preference. Sorry about that. Ted Watson (talk) 19:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Nah, that's OK, I didn't read anything into it, I just took my own opinion and went with it! LOL. Thanks for pointing out the issue. — TAnthonyTalk 19:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)