User talk:Stannered

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Euro 2008

I'm sorry but in all seriousness I want to know what problem you have with the amalgamation of Austria and Switzerland.

Please answer this question otherwise I will be forced to start a major, and I mean MAJOR, leaflet campaign!!! (and 1) that's a joke 2) a quote from Red Dwarf)


I have no problem with it personally, but saying that referring to it as such is "common" is rather inaccurate. Google returns zero links. Stannered 00:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I thankyou for answering my questions, and having checked on Google I concour with yourself. Obviously this name has not reached the masses yet.


Welcome!


Hello, Stannered, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] commons:User:Stannered

I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Stannered Stannered 01:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vector images

They look great. Thanks for creating them. enochlau (talk) 02:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on User talk:Enochlau. Stannered 13:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all the work you've done so far - you're such an SVG whiz! enochlau (talk) 01:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coxeter-Dynkin diagrams

I moved your test images to Talk:Coxeter-Dynkin diagram and tried printing a page, on a nice 1200dpi laser printer, and really svg results don't look better than the pixel ones, actually worse. The printer dithers the grayscale boundary colors and it just looks fuzzy. Is there any way to disable grayscale/antialiasing for svg conversion to png? I mean I have no idea at all, could be an issue with the SVG format or with the PNG renderer. Tom Ruen 07:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Bsm

Template:Bsm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.

Also, similarly for {{esm}}.

You might notice that this affects your user page. — Kevinkor2 16:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Hit the Road"

This is a "rip-off" font. It is not genuine Highway Gothic E, but it a close resemblance. It is actually Highway Gothic D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ilovevancouver90909 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] SVG tagging of chemical structures

Is there a particular reason why you tag chemical structures as SVG candidates when this is against the current guidelines on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chemistry/Structure_drawing. Cacycle 01:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:IP stack connections.svg

As you requested, I finally got around to make this Image:IP stack connections.svg.

PNG SVG

I didn't convert from OpenOffice directly since it looked bad and opted to redraw the whole thing from scratch (the internet cloud was fun). Cburnett 02:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

for your insight :) - BriEnBest 09:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject University of Oxford

WikiProject University of Oklahoma

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Oxford. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Casper Gutman 16:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] some questions about the site you gave me

  • what is an integral fraction?
  • what does (i think they are) alpha, and mu, represent in the first equation?
  • would the vw of a wave on an ocean be how fast the wave travels along the surface of the ocean? and is the wave velocity of photon c?
  • what is a "normal mode"?
  • what is a world sheet, or world line?
  • ...i didn't get all the way through it, yet... - BriEnBest 06:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rugby Union blank line ups.svg

Hey, thanks for creating Image:Rugby Union blank line ups.svg. I was wondering if it was possible to be able to specify different names for the positions? There are alternative names depending on where you live (see Rugby union positions). Also, is it possible to have wiki-links on the position names linking to their relevant section in Rugby union positions? - Shudda talk 22:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

It's certainly possible to have different names, but as far as I know, each version would require a different SVG file, and I'm pretty sure that wikilinks from within an image are not possible. That said, Template:Football lineup seems to have all kinds of crazy stuff going on - although I can't see where it's been used to see what it does. Stannered 22:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Sure thing - give me the data and I'll spew out some SVG for you :-) Stannered 11:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] St Anne's College

Hi Stannered. On reflection, I may well have been too harsh in my rating. It does fulfil the loose Start-class criteria of an adequate picture and "a subheading that fully treats and element of the topic" ie. location. So I will upgrade the rating. Areas for improvement:

  • expanding the history of the college
  • a few more pictures
  • sections (or at least the start of sections) on college traditions (such as the college grace, and the coat of arms) and student life - what is St Anne's famous for among students

Do I guess from the user name that you're at Anne's? (If so, greetings from a little further south - I'm at St John's) Cricketgirl 09:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah once I looked at the proliferation of userboxes on your main page I figured out who you were too! This is a little spooky... But I'm not a stalker! Good to see someone else is putting off their quantum and EM revision by editing on Wikipedia...Cricketgirl 11:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your wonderful image

Thank you very much for your amazing vector version of the standard warning sign - a big improvement, with the obvious benefit over the PNG. There is now a serious proposal underway at WikiProject user warnings to use it as the standard warning symbol in all the vandal warning templates. I just thought you'd like to know. And I also thought you may enjoy some editing resources below - they can be very useful, if only as a quick reference for policy. See you around. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello Stannered! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Yup. As you can see here, almost all instances of in user talk warnings have been replaced with . Well done! You may need to ask an admin to protect the en-wiki image page for it, as this image will often be the first thing on the talk page of any vandals from now on. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hey, thanks for converting the WinFS PNG images to SVG. :) By the way, if you do not mind disclosing your trade secrets (:D), how do you vectorize a raster image? --soum (0_o) 23:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that. :) I am now checking out Inkscape. :P Have a nice day, or night, wherever you are. Cheers. :) --soum (0_o) 16:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SVG request

Hi Ed!

Anytime you're inspired sometime, a few images that could use a vector version: (First three made from cool free software, KaleidoTile [1]) Tom Ruen 02:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

  1. Image:Cube truncation sequence.png
  2. Image:Cube cantellation sequence.png
  3. Image:Birectified cube sequence.png
  4. Image:Snubcubes in grCO.png

[edit] Wikinews Video Edition Logo

I didn't make the image... It was made by another user as part of a project... I'll take a look

thanks--talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 11:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

The font for the wikinews logo is aparrently Swis721 Ex BT

thanx!

Don't forget, the wikipedi alogo is already vectorised!

all we need is the text

--talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 11:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ooooh! Shiny Star!

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for your fast response and, great work, first time on the wikinews video edition logo! talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 13:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] argument map typos and image format change over

Thanks for fixing the SVG typos in Image:Traffic congestion straw man.svg. I just uploaded another version of the file in PNG format because I can't save as SVG. I made some other minor corrections in addition to the typos and changed the licensing to GDFL(I figured as the author I could do what I wanted and someone could only use the original licensing with the original file). Now no articles link to the svg one, just to Image:Traffic congestion straw man.png, so I am considering having an admin delete the svg version along with all of the jpeg versions of my other argument maps once I have converted them to PNG. I know that the SVG format is slightly more efficient, but I may make some minor corrections to them (for logical structure) as well as fix any typos.

I noticed as well that you placed a transparent background with the image, it looks much nicer so I will do the same from now on with my conversions. Grumpyyoungman01 09:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I converted the map to SVG because it was requested on the image page... deleting again would be counterproductive (and wasting my time). SVG files are dead easy to edit - download Inkscape from www.inkscape.org. Text editing is a matter of clicking the text with the text tool and retyping. Regarding licensing, I'm not sure it's possible to withdraw an image from the public domain once you've released it to it. If you let me know exactly where the changes are (if they're not easy text edits), I can make them in the SVG file for you. Stannered 09:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] {{svg}}

Thank you for informing me about {{svg|fairuse}}. I am a very big supporter of the SVG file format, and this is truly appreciated. -KingpinE7 02:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Polytope model skewed.svg

Stannered, thanks for converting Image:Polytope model unskewed.png to SVG format. However, when you converted Image:Polytope model skewed.png to SVG, you permuted the colors wrongly, so that it no longer represents the same graph. I've reverted your last change to Polytope model accordingly. Once Image:Polytope model skewed.svg matches Image:Polytope model skewed.png, please un-revert. Thanks again! --Quuxplusone 07:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I've corrected it, and viewing the SVG directly shows it properly, but for some reason MediaWiki-generated thumbnails are not updating. Purging the cache doesn't seem to have helped. Could you check and see whether the SVG renders properly for you? Stannered 09:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A request

Could you please lend a hand vectorizing this image? Thanks a ton. :) --soum (0_o) 01:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm currently trying to take a wikivectorising wikibreak, as I have finals in three weeks (ARGH). If after June 17th the image is still in need of vectorising, I'll have a look at it then :-) Stannered 08:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure no probs. All the best for your exams. :) --soum (0_o) 20:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:One_Star_DBZ.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:One_Star_DBZ.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Iamunknown 22:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Crude UM logo legal for User pages.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Crude UM logo legal for User pages.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Rklawton 16:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I take copyright statuses of images I SVGise at face value. Feel free to delete. Stannered 18:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for updating the link in my userpage. :) --soum talk 03:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Thanks for vectorizing Debian Releases.svg. I was hoping someone would convert it for me, and you've done a wonderful job. You're a great contributor to Wikipedia. --Ice Ardor (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use image tagging for SVG

Hi Stannered,

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I've actually posted on that page earlier today although when I spoke to titan earlier I hadn't seen it yet. The whole system needs a serious shake up in my opinion. Theres a general consensus it seems of "its fine, we havent been caught out yet", but the fact remains its against the law to resize a logo which by SVG conversion we are doing. There are literally hundreds of images which say "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia..." Then directly beneath it is the SVG tag promoting the image to be redrawn as at an effectively higher resolution, infinite print quality etc. This means the image can be used by us (and others) for profit gains which makes it illegal use of the image. Theres no two ways about it, its absolutely illegal. We need to address it as soon as possible before we get caught out, as far as I can see so far no one has actually SVG'ed a logo but its a ticking time bomb to just leave it on the logic that we've been okay so far and that its probably alright.

Equally, the definition of a logo seems to have become anomalous on wikipedia to just include corporate brand logos, not logos such as wi-fi enabled hotspot logos, product identity logos, video game, DVD and film rating logos etc. I think its something we need to be very careful with as the last thing we want to do is get accused of fair use violation of a logo. Its something many companys take extremely seriously, more so infact than say using a copyrighted photograph improperly. Wikipedia seems to have a collection of some of the best artists around and it isn't hard for many of us to redraw corporate logos with seemingly no differences, once these logos are on wikipedia anyone can download them and we become a provider of illegal copyrighted material.

The original discussion over at the page in question never seems to have come to a conclusion or addressed the original problem that we are tagging copyrighted logos for enlargement and clarification which is against the law if we actually go ahead with it. I hope this better explains my position, please feel free to drop me a note if you have any questions on all of this. ta. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 19:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh forget to mention that while I see that you guys reached consensus I don't agree with it myself. Interiots view on it is primarily what I disagree with. I totally see the logic behind it but as far as I can see there its still illegal to convert a raster graphic into SVG. My reasoning is with how the image will come out printed primarily. Raster v's Vector doesn't nessessarily mean higher quality in the SVG version on screen, however, raster graphics will be limited in print quality as all PC screens show images at either 72 or on rare occasions 96 pixels per inch. On paper however this value can be as high as 2400. up to 600 ppi is a clearly visible quality increase just with the naked eye. SVG allows for infinite rescaling of images. A 300x300 pixel image at 300ppi for example will print at 1" by 1" on paper, any larger and it will start to lose quality (preventing someone making a 40" banner of it for example). However an SVG could be printed at any size with no loss of quality. So by placing a duplicate quality SVG version of a raster graphic on wikipedia we are providing people with an image which when printed will exceed the quality the original was drawn at, which breaks the law. That means people not authorised to use or posess the logo can aquire our duplicate SVG version and use it for personal gain. Therefore, we ourselfs are in breach of copyright law by providing the image to begin with. It seems very clear cut to me, I don't see why there is any need for consensus or debate on it as its a simple matter of the law, what we're doing is in breach of it.WikipedianProlific(Talk) 20:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi again, yeah I totally agree on the matter of consensus. Hence why I'm seeking new consensus further down the page. I think the question with regards to companies who provide vectors of their logo is; are they providing it so people like us can resize it or is it for their own use or perhaps even their own mistake not realising the potential a vector logo has to be used unlawfully. If they are providing it for people like us then I believe we're fine to use it, but I'm yet to come across a logo like that. I have come across many however which are simply logos tagged by novice editors for SVG without really understanding either the legal situation or even the requirements of an SVG image. After all, not all logos are suitable for transfer to SVG, especially older, pre-computer ones. In any case, I look forward to your opinions and hopefully a new consensus can be reached which fits better with the law. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 21:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request...

...could you edit Image:Tmi-2 schematic.svg to change "cooland" to "coolant" in the lower right hand part of the "primart stage" ? Thanx. 68.39.174.238 12:22, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Done Did Stannered 17:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SVG highway shields

Hello. I have several highway and county road shields listed at List_of_roads_in_Essex_County,_Ontario, and i was wondering if you could help me out in eventually creating SVG-eqvivalent images of them. I was hoping to have them all just like Image:York Regional Road 49.svg in shape (instead of having the small zig-zags that mine do. Thanks for taking the time to read my message! :) RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 21:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ugly (?) image

I ran across your user page in a google search for "using ugly images". Please consider commenting in this thread. Thanks! -- Jreferee (Talk) 04:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] problems with Prentice position

I came across this article and was baffled in some respects. I left a note on the talk page, and as you one of the editors of the article, I'm asking if you would talk a look at the problems I noted. Thanks. ww 06:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License for 1FactK8.svg

Hi. I ran across this image which you created and had tagged PD-ineligible. I'm not sure I PD-ineligible is applciable so since it's created by you that means that you're free to pick a free license. /Lokal_Profil 14:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

As it's an exact copy of another 2D image, the copyright remains the same as on the original image (I can't have any copyright claim on the image) so it has to be public-domain (as the original was). Stannered 15:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok, you can technically license your contributions to the image under a license (such as commons:Template:PD-retouched-user). The main thing is that PD-ineligible isn't applicable so I just wanted to tell you that I'll remove that license. The image page will still say that the original image (and thus this one) was released as PD-user though so there are no worries about licensing. Thanks /Lokal_Profil 12:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Need to fix bold "0"'s in Image:Laser printer-Writing.svg Y Done

Heh, someone finally decided to tackle this ridiculously complex drawing I made in Microsoft Word, to remake it as an SVG.

Some small changes are needed in your SVG. A few zeroes in the RIP bitmap are bolded, and when Wikipedia renders the SVG at a smaller size, the bold zeroes mess up the layout so that the "W" is no longer clearly visible at the smaller size.

Also, there's an extra "electron" in bottom-center of the W on the drum.

Otherwise good job. :)

Your SVG: My original PNG:

I don't have an SVG editor and so cannot change this myself.

DMahalko 19:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

In case you're interested, it was not actually bold fonts causing the problem (I was puzzled as to what was at first), but the fact that I'd accidentally left a second copy of the text behind the first; the second copy was black, and I'd made the first transparent rather than grey. All fixed now, anywho. Stannered 21:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] /poke

teen This user is a teenager, not a stereotype.




That userbox is so 2-3 years ago =)
See you soon, --BlueNovember 15:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cross-polytope SVGs?

Hi Stannered! At your convenience, could you help with some SVG images like Image:Cross_graph_5.svg for 6..9? I have my lo-res pngs like Image:Cross graph 9.png, happy if replaced! Also nice if the nodes could have red dots. Same issues at Simplex. I tried some tinkering on my own, like Image:Complete graph K9.svg, but not great results. Thanks! Tom Ruen (talk) 03:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

I've done the cross polytopes, both with and without red dotted nodes. Image:Cross graph 9.svg and Image:Cross graph 9 Nodes highlighted.svg are the naming patterns I've used; replace 9 with 6..8 for the others. Stannered 19:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I've now done K9; do you want K10 and K11 created to illustrate the 9- and 10-simpleces on Simplex? Stannered 19:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Cool! K10 and K11 would be great too. Also I assume it wouldn't be hard (for you) to add like red circles on the nodes on the cross polytopes, not that important, but helps clarify no nodes on the inner intersections. Tom Ruen 20:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
P.S. I hope you have a short cut for making these, that you're not just hand-drawing lines, well I guess 11x10/2=55 lines for K11? :( Tom Ruen 21:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
You mean the 1 - 5 cross polytopes? As I mentioned, the 6 - 9 polytopes already have versions with marked nodes. K10 and K11 are now done. I'm not doing it by hand; I'm node editing regular polytopes (as generated by Inkscape) to remove all but two points, keeping one point fixed, then rotating the whole thing to get the lines from other points. Means that each line has a duplicate, but as they are collinear, it's not noticeable. Someone can remove them if they want. Stannered 22:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! Glad you had a rotation operation to help - very sneaky! Are there nodes marked here Image:Cross graph 9.svg? I can't see any. I'm happy with all the additions. Drawing nodes on all are helpful but not needed. Tom Ruen 00:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
No, but they're on here: Image:Cross graph 9 Nodes highlighted.svg. Stannered 00:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ShouldBeSVG

Thank you for the message; I will be sure to utilise those extra parameters in the future :) --Anthony5429 (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help on polytope image

Hi Stannered,

There's an SVG that has a missing line. Can you edit it? [2]

It's a diagonal line in the lower right.

Much appreciated if you can help. Tom Ruen (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Done, although it seems to have doubled the filesize. Inkscape doesn't seem to preserve whatever node-saving tricks were being used in the file. Stannered (talk) 11:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK Medal gradient

I had to do it in layers, because SVG won't let you do a gradient around an edge like that. So there are literally 6 different borders around the ribband - 1 for the outer color and one with the gradient for each of the edges. If you look at the corners, the gradients intersect and continue to the edges instead of rounding the corner. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 09:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Strange request

Hi, can you please drop me a line on my talk page? We don't know each other, you're simply the first person I found on the recent changes page, so I have somewhat of a guarantee you're online. I'm asking you to do this because I need to see the Wikipedia format for "you have new messages", for a technical proposal. Thank you! --Gutza T T+ 01:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to have bothered you, please disregard the request above. --Gutza T T+ 01:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Files-11

You tagged Files-11 with "please wikify" along with the edit summary images/captions in particular need some attention. I'm taking a whack at addressing the issue, but not sure which aspects you meant. Have a look at it now and comment/revert/etc. Thanks. —EncMstr 02:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

It's looking much better - the section "Index file: INDEXF.SYS" still has an image in a <div>, and it's so big that it sprawls off my (1400px-wide) monitor. Thanks for doing this (and so quickly, too) Stannered (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] G&D's Ice Cream Cafe

I think we have a sockpuppet at work. Since you've made some efforts on this article, would you care to review the latest attempt to insert uncited info? Pairadox (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] SVG conversion for birectification

Hi Stannered,

If you're interested sometime, here's a pretty simple stable PNG image I made I think is worthy to convert to SVG. Thanks! Tom Ruen (talk) 22:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Birectified cube sequence.png

[edit] Oxbridge user templates

When you asked about the right hand side box on the User school talk page in regards to Oxbridge, I took a look at the school. I have begun working on a merged Oxbridge user template that, when completed, will be easy to use. Would you be willing to help me with this, I have the beginnings of the template set up, I just have a few questions.

  1. Do I have the correct abbreviations for each of the schools?
  2. Regarding the schools' colors
    1. What should the background color of the left and right hand boxes be?
    2. What should the font color of the left and right hand boxes be?
    3. What should the background color of the center box be?
    4. What should the font color of the the center box box be?
  3. Should it include a Camford box?
  4. Should it include the fictional colleges of Oxbridge, Cambridge, and Oxford for fun?
  5. Would you use this box and get others to use it?

If you look at the bottom of the page, you will see that the template will generate the categories for each of the collages. I will be working on the attends/attended/alumnus issue next.

I would like to know what you think about it, so please give the draft a peek.

Thank you. - LA @ 16:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A new Oxbridge user box

Stannered...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 17:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image help

Hi there, I saw your image Image:USA flag on television.svg and was wondering if you could do something similar with the flag of Ohio for WikiProject Ohio. Thank you for your time, §tepshep • ¡Talk to me! 22:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

How about Image:Ohio flag on television.svg? Stannered (talk) 22:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

That was quick, thank you! §tepshep • ¡Talk to me! 22:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:4400-TV-icon-2.png

The font I used was Engravers MT (I don't remember if it was bold or not), and then modified the digits by erasing a line through them. Thanks in advance for your work to improve upon it! Travisl (talk) 00:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Very nice. Travisl (talk) 01:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] {{Convert to SVG and copy to Wikimedia Commons}}

For now, the only way of fixing that is to reduce the size of the image, which I've done. See Template talk:Imbox for more details. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 23:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)