User talk:Rex Germanus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user has lost faith in the project and left Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is no longer about who is right or wrong. It's not about discussing, referencing and accepting one was wrong. It's about blocks, personal attacks and lies.

It's better to stop editing when getting one, because no one is going to take you seriously. You're branded. Admins will ignore you, make offensive remarks and will reward the ones who provoke you. You're an outcast, no matter how good and well-sourced your edits are. I refuse to accept that.

I've loved editing Wikipedia. With over 8500 edits, dozens of articles and media to show for it, but enough is enough. I demand to be treated as a human being and I will not lower myself anymore. Enough is enough.

I'm leaving Wikipedia, standing by every edit I ever made here wether on an article or on a talk page, and denying the admins the pleasure of banning me.

—Rex

Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud.

—Sophocles

Wie een hond wil slaan, vindt licht een stok.

—Dutch proverb.

They found their sticks. Rex (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

1 Community ban
2 Fair use rationale for Image:Frau Antje Der Spiegel.jpg
3 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Maassluis.jpg
4 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Middelburg.jpg
5 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Vlaardingen.jpg
6 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Rotterdam.jpg
7 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Mercuur.jpg
8 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Bruinvis1.jpg
9 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Dolfijn.jpg
10 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Nes.jpg
11 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Galen.jpg
12 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Speijk.jpg
13 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Zeeleeuw.jpg
14 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Karel Doorman.jpg
15 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Willem van der Zaan.jpg
16 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tjerk Hiddes.jpg
17 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Amstel.jpg
18 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Evertsen.jpg
19 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter.jpg
20 Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tromp.jpg
21 Image source problem with Image:Hr. Ms. De Zeven Provinciën.jpg
22 AfD nomination of Goldmember
23 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
24 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shieldwall.JPG
25 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Slagroomtaart.jpg
26 Speedy deletion of Template:Eighty Years' War
27 AfD nomination of List of terms used for Germans
28 Milhist coordinators election has started
29 Fair use rationale for Image:BATTLENETHERLANDS2.JPG
30 Unspecified source for Image:Marcus_van_Boxhorn.gif
31 Image source problem with Image:Wilhelmus.png

[edit] Community ban

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

See Wikipedia:List of banned users#Banned by the Wikipedia community. - Jehochman ^Talk 17:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Angusmclellan (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights) has removed your name from that list. The statement there formerly said:

Rex Germanus (talk • contribs • block log), December 11, 2007

Community banned for repeated edit warring, point of view pushing, incivility, and use of IP sock puppets to evade scrutiny and editing restrictions. Fifteen prior blocks failed to change the behavior.

Sincerely - Jehochman ^Talk 11:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Please note that you remain indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will remain blocked for ninety days at least. At the end of that period, you may contact me by email to discuss whether, and under what restrictions, you might be permitted to resume editing with this account. Any decision to unblock you would be subject to Jehochman's veto. Any violation of the terms that may be agreed would result in immediate indefinite blocking. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I will support any reasonable terms proposed by Angusmclellan. - Jehochman ^Talk 12:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Frau Antje Der Spiegel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Frau Antje Der Spiegel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Maassluis.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Maassluis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Middelburg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Middelburg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Vlaardingen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Vlaardingen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Rotterdam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms.Rotterdam.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Mercuur.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms.Mercuur.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms.Bruinvis1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms.Bruinvis1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Dolfijn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Dolfijn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Nes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Nes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Galen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Galen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Speijk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Speijk.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Zeeleeuw.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Zeeleeuw.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Karel Doorman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Karel Doorman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Willem van der Zaan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Willem van der Zaan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tjerk Hiddes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Tjerk Hiddes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Van Amstel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Van Amstel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Evertsen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Evertsen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. De Ruyter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr.Ms. Tromp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr.Ms. Tromp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Hr. Ms. De Zeven Provinciën.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hr. Ms. De Zeven Provinciën.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] AfD nomination of Goldmember

An article that you have been involved in editing, Goldmember, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldmember. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXII (December 2007)

Project news

The Intelligence task force has been created.
The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
Help with converting deprecated infoboxes is needed; any assistance is welcome!
{{WPMILHIST}} now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages.

Articles of note

New featured articles:

New A-Class articles:

Current proposals and discussions

A discussion about minimizing terminological ambiguity has begun.

Awards and honors

Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.

Tag & Assess 2007

Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:

1. Bedford — 7,600

2. TomStar81 — 5,500

3. Parsival74 — 5,200

4. FayssalF — 3,500

5. Roger Davies — 3,000

6. Ouro — 2600

7. Kateshortforbob — 2250

8. Cromdog — 2,200

9. BrokenSphere — 2000

9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000

9. Maralia — 2,000

12. MBK004 — 1,340

13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250

14. Sniperz11 — 1100

15. Burzmali — 1000

15. Cplakidas — 1000

15. Gimme danger — 1000

15. Raoulduke471000

15. TicketMan — 1000

15. Welsh — 1000

15. Blnguyen — 1000

Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.

We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants alike are very welcome and appreciated.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shieldwall.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Shieldwall.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Slagroomtaart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slagroomtaart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Eighty Years' War

A tag has been placed on Template:Eighty Years' War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of List of terms used for Germans

An editor has nominated List of terms used for Germans, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of terms used for Germans and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 21:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BATTLENETHERLANDS2.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BATTLENETHERLANDS2.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 16:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Marcus_van_Boxhorn.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcus_van_Boxhorn.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 14:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Wilhelmus.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilhelmus.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)