Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Intelligence task force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shortcut:
WP:INTEL

Welcome to the Intelligence task force of the Military history WikiProject! The task force coordinator is Nick Dowling (talk).

Contents

[edit] Scope

This task force covers the military and national security aspects of intelligence gathering. It is not intended to cover all aspects of what may be termed "espionage"; the precise limits of its scope, however, have yet to be defined.

[edit] Participants

Please remember to also add your name to the main list of project members if you are not yet listed there.

  1. ALR (talk · contribs) (Mainly interested in strategic analysis, Int management, capability exploitation, the UK Intelligence Machinery and the interface with allies and UK military)
  2. Hcberkowitz (talk · contribs) (Intelligence cycle including collection, analysis, and dissemination. MASINT,SIGINT,HUMINT. Cleaning up Central Intelligence Agency into manageable series of articles, reducing conspiracies and increasing fact.)
  3. Folic_Acid (talk · contribs) (US intelligence, intelligence oversight, HUMINT, SIGINT)
  4. ktr101 (talk · contribs) (USAF Intelligence)
  5. Mooseberry (talk · contribs) (All types of intelligence, sorting out fact from fiction, codes, U.S.A. codes, etc.)
  6. ScreaminEagle (talk · contribs) (Seems a bit daunting, but I'll try to help when and where I can)

[edit] Tagging and assessment

Intelligence task force assessment statistics
Intelligence
articles
Importance
None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
Good article GA 1 1
B 13 13
Start 145 145
Stub 30 30
Assessed 190 190
Total 190 190
worklistlogcategory

Any article related to this task force should be marked by adding Intel-task-force=yes (or Intel=yes) to the {{WPMILHIST}} project banner at the top of its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax). This will automatically place it into Category:Intelligence task force articles.

[edit] Articles (Starting list with commentary by Howard)

Note there is overlap with Special Operations. are proposals

[edit] The Intelligence Series

Intelligence cycle management
Intelligence collection management
SIGINT+
SIGINT by Alliances, Nations and Industries
SIGINT Operational Platforms by Nation
SIGINT in Modern History
Traffic analysis
MASINT+
Electro-optical MASINT
Nuclear MASINT
Geophysical MASINT
Radar MASINT should true imaging radar move to IMINT?
Radiofrequency MASINT
Materials MASINT
HUMINT
Clandestine HUMINT strong tie-in with counterintelligence
Special reconnaissance also a special operations technique
Special reconnaissance organizations
Clandestine HUMINT operational techniques
Clandestine HUMINT asset recruiting
Clandestine HUMINT and Covert Action (also see Direct action (military))
Clandestine cell system
OSINT$
TECHINT$
medical intelligence (if it doesn't go under intelligence organizations)
IMINT$
Should imaging radar move here, but not, for example, tracking radar used to determine missile performance? Anything from electro-optical MASINT? My basic rule: IMINT forms pictures, quasi-imaging MASINT gives graphs or property-by-pixel tables'
Intelligence analysis management
Intelligence analysis
Cognitive traps for intelligence analysis
Financial intelligence
economic intelligence, which I'm probably not qualified to write
medical intelligence if it doesn't go elsewhere
Intelligence dissemination management
Intelligence cycle security
Counterintelligence
Counterintelligence failures*
Counter-intelligence and counterterror organizations* (fairly unhappy with what's around

Articles marked with * either are split out from other lengthy articles and expanded, or of assorted short articles of the class I call "glue", as necessary to connect other articles or provide context, such as Echelons above Corps.

Force multiplication is another tricky one, which then feeds into network-centric warfare as well as takes from John Boyd and the various Special Forces ancestors/

+ articles have daughter articles, some I wrote and some that existed; some merging is probably called for. $ denotes contributions but no major rewrite.

and, with help from others, trying to deal with what are increasingly forced lists. When is an organization "counterintelligence" versus "counterterror"?

[edit] CIA-specific

Cleaning up the overly long single CIA article (ignoring separate regime change), I rationalized and, where possible, sourced decently and also eliminated the more bizarre conspiracy theories (e.g., Swiss under NATO). These new articles include analytic and estimative intelligence, not only covert action.

Obviously, there's a lot of conspiracy theory buffs about, and people have been renaming pages.

The geographic divisions are:

The initial set of transnational sub-articles are:

[edit] Special Operations

[edit] National Means of Technical Verification

does this need to go under counterproliferation, which, in turn, requires proliferation to be well defined?

As a result of writing articles on the more exotic technical disciplines of intelligence collection, such as SIGINT and MASINT. As I worked on these, I realized that many of the technologies were important in arms control verification, but, while there were articles on the arms control treaties, there was nothing on the euphemistic National technical means of verification. Earlier editing of a biography of George Kistiakowsky and his invention of the threshold principle of verification also fed into this article. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

This article has numerous links to MASINT technologies, especially Geophysical MASINT, Materials MASINT, and Electro-optical MASINT.

[edit] Miscellaneous Articles with some relationship

[edit] Counterintelligence and related areas

There are some overlaps and confusing writing in some of the more US government policies, relating counterintelligence to operations security and those to other security disciplines. Ironically, I actually encountered some of the information, in the sixties, that explains some of the OPSEC rationale. The documents were "declassify in 3 years" in the late sixties, but they probably are sitting on microfilm somewhere, and I have no idea how to cite them -- I just remember the document series, the general subject of the article, and the specific issues that led to the development of OPSEC discipline.

Anyway, this all intertwines with HUMINT and subordinate articles.

[edit] Templates

[edit] Categories


[edit] To-do

Attention needed 
...to referencing and citation (47) • ...to coverage and accuracy (23) • ...to structure (13) • ...to grammar (3) • ...to supporting materials (21)
Cleanup needed 
Evidenzbureau
Citations needed 
Admiralty code
Tagging needed 
Category:Military intelligence
visit task force · edit this list
  • Tag articles.
  • Recruit interested editors.
  • Collect categories, resource links, and templates.
  • Expand the open task listing above.
  • Add things here!

[edit] Resources

  • Add things here!

[edit] Annotated bibliography

Please use the following format when adding works:

* <!-- bibliographical information -->
** Content:
*** <!-- optional content summary -->
** Reviews: 
*** <!-- commentary on work by historians & other reputable sources -->
** Editor comments: 
*** <!-- personal commentary by editors -->
http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/20/280529.aspx