User talk:João Felipe C.S
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Melt the clouds of sin and sadness, drive the dark of doubt away! Marlith T/C has wished you well! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the WikiJoy by sharing the joy someone else, Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing! [edit] More picturesOi Felipe. Vi que você acrescentou voto pras fotos. Você se importa se eu ajustar a formatação e colocar a sua justificativa para cada foto ao lado do seu voto?--Dali-Llama 00:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brazil PageGeography: se houver consenso acerca da forma e do conteúdo na seção de Geografia, faço as alterações. Quanto às subseções, quis dizer que não entendo porque precisamos detalhar o "clima" se não vamos detalhar outros aspectos igualmente importantes. Nunca vi o "clima" ser considerado mais importante do que o "relevo", a "hidrografia", a "vegetação", ou, principalmente, a "produção" em livros de Geografia nacionais ou em vestibulares. Todos esses aspectos são igualmente importantes. Logo, não entendo a razão para esse destaque. Faço duas sugestões: 1 - Geography dividida em 5 subseções: Climate, Topography, Vegetation ou Flora and Fauna, Hydography, Production. Alternativamente, dá para reduzir o número de seções em 3, assim: Climate and Hydography, Topography and Vegetation e Production. 2 - Não dividir em subseções e concentrar o texto inteiro num bloco único. Lead: quanto à introdução do artigo, fiz uma pequena alteração, pois você havia reservado praticamente 1/3 dela para informações detalhadas pertinentes à economia, e eliminou todas as informações demográficas. Não me parece que os artigos FA sigam esse modelo. Normalmente o pessoal costuma dar mais ênfase para noções gerais de localização, história, geografia, demografia e política na introdução. Acho que deve haver alguma coisa sobre economia, é claro. Só não 1/3 da introdução. Os detalhes entram melhor na seção de economia mesmo. Social issues: você havia feito menção a um resumo da seção de problemas sociais. Dei uma lida nela e não consegui pegar os pontos que você quer resumir. Meu trabalho: apesar de estar com pouco tempo para o Wikipedia, estou atualmente mais focado em subpages do Brasil, pois não sei o que o artigo principal ainda precisa. Minha sugestão é que o artigo principal seja listado em peer review de FA, para outros editores apontarem o que ainda está faltando. Aí fica mais fácil, com um parâmetro de trabalho. Abraços Sparks1979 18:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] Scient and technology pictureRespondo aqui então. =) Não acho uma boa descrição--de fato a Embraer monta aviões, e não os fabrica. As asas são feitas pela GAMESA na Espanha, o nariz pela Norton nos EUA, o cockpit pela Honeywell também nos EUA, a cauda pela ENAER no Chile, motor pela Rolls-Royce na Inglaterra, e por aí vai... Então "produced in Brazil and used around the world" é mais correto do que falar "Brazilian technology". Afinal, quem é o proprietário da tecnologia? A empresa que faz o projeto, a empresa que faz a encomenda, a empresa que fabrica ou a empresa que monta?--Dali-Llama 02:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Featured pictureCaro João Felipe, agradeço sua indicação de uma foto minha para ser destacada. Só hoje pude constatar isto. Infelizmente teve comentarista que chegou ao ponto de achar que a foto foi retocada no fotoshop. Num ambiente colaborativo acho triste haver quem duvide da integridade dos colegas. Outro disse que nunca viu uma chuva cair de uma forma tão concentrada. Este, pelo jeito, deve ter crescido em alguma metrópole, só vê chuva pela janela. Houve quem achasse um defeito a chuva concentrada. Parece que não entendeu nada, pois é ai que eu acho que reside o valor da foto. Foi uma oportunidade única estar em Brasília e pegar um pé d'água caindo atrás do congresso como se fosse sobre uma concha voltada para o céu ou como se fosse a chuva "Lavando o Congresso". Aliás, ele ainda necessita de muita água para limpar um pouco o que ocorre lá. Valeu! Obrigado Zimbres 03:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] BrazilAs duas imagens são interessantes. A primeira tem a vantagem de ser mais "limpa", e a segunda tem a vantagem de levar o escrito "embraer" na fuselagem do avião. Não sei qual é a melhor. Há outros editores da página do Brasil que podem dar o voto de desempate. Se houver tempo, semana que vem farei algumas alterações no texto do Brasil nas seções "Geography" e "Administrative divisions". Estou pensando em enumerar o artigo na lista de "peer review" para FA. Abraços! Sparks1979 13:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] Text literally copied from my userpageHello Joao. A friend just told me that you literally copied (months ago!) the introduction text in my userpage and edited it, just replacing my name for yours and my location for yours. That is kinda odd and strange, since that text is intented to be personal. I don't know how to react or feel. I think it would be better if you can create your own introduction, because as I told you, that text should be personal.
AlexCovarrubias ( Talk? ) 22:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Template para estadosOlá Me baseando no Template:Infobox Country, criei o Template:Infobox Brazilian State. Ele será mais simples que o template para os países e padronizará os infobox dos estados Brasileiros. Você poderia fazer a conversão para ele, ou pedir para alguem fazer?
[edit] Foto do time brasileiroLí lá que agora só os admins vão resolver, então achei melhor não comentar. Sinceramente você já explicitou todos os seus pontos de vista, que eu também concordo, apesar de algumas horas ter levado para o lado pessoal e "atacado" o artigo do México. De qualquer modo, vê se vocês acham alguma foto que apareça jogadores de vários esportes, de várias "raças" (a abertura do Pan, por exemplo). É provável que assim eles parem de emplicar com a foto (que não é ruim, mas só faz os outros acreditarem que esporte no Brasil é sinônimo de futebol). Abraços — Guilherme (t/c) 22:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rio de Janeiro imagesCaro João Felipe, há pouco tempo removi umas alteraçoes de imagens que voce fez no artigo Rio de Janeiro e você as reverteu. Gostaria de explicar-lhe por que acho que as imagens que você retirou sao mais adequadas ao artigo: 1) na subseçao "Rio Downtown" antes havia uma imagem do alto que mostrava claramente (de dia!) os edifícios do centro, inclusive a catedral, uma paisagem muito característica do centro; agora você pôs uma foto escura, tirada no meio de uma avenida que poderia ser qualquer avenida de qualquer cidade grande do planeta (aqui em Buenos Aires eu posso tirar a mesma foto), ou seja, uma foto que nao caracteriza o centro. 2) A foto anterior do Maracana na subseçao "North Zone" era uma foto aérea que mostrava nao só o estádio como a área circundante. Como nao há boas fotos no Commons da zona norte, essa pelo menos mostrava algo do cityscape da zona. A foto que está agora é uma foto que nao mostra nada da zona norte. 3) A foto em "History" do Copacabana Palace mostrava algo da zona circundante (Avenida Atlântica, outros edifícios do bairro), e você a substituiu por uma foto que mostra um close-up da fachada, que nao mostra nada da zona. Seria o mesmo se a foto do Paço Imperial fosse só do portal (há uma foto assim no Commons) ao invés da foto que está no artigo, que mostra o edifício inteiro e dá uma idéia do seu enquadramento urbanístico. Gostaria de saber sua opiniao sobre isso. Fsouza 20:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Img-LinkTemplate:Img-Link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — BanyanTree 13:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] Reply from The HybridHow exactly is changing the size of the article bad? Two images was the compromise. If we just use one we will end up in the dispute again. The Hybrid 20:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brazilian States by GDP per capitaNa página List of Brazilian states by GDP per capita faltou uma informação muito importante: a unidade monetária. Obviamente ela é baseada no dólar americano, mas isso não significa que tal informação possa ser omitida do artigo sem que haja comprometimento de sua qualidade. Achei melhor você mesmo corrigir essa omissão, pois o artigo foi criado por você. Abraços! Sparks1979 13:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PortalI will work with the portal from time to time, you should ask Marcos for some help with it, he has done a great work with Puerto Rico's portal. - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC) [edit] RespostasNossa Felipe! Você faz 1001 coisas ao mesmo tempo! Não consigo ser assim não. rsrsrs :-P [edit] Template:Navigation BrazilOlá Felipe [edit] Sports sectionCara, acho que reverter aquilo depois de toda aquela discussão, nesse momento, não seria uma boa idéia. Tenha a certeza de que o pessoal que participou daquele debate continua "de olho" e não vai deixar passar "em branco". Acho que o momento mais adequado seria após o peer review para FA - se eles derem a sugestão de mudar, você terá fundamentos para tanto. Sparks1979 01:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] HurryI can't believe this, but I need you to call some of your “buddies” so they'll vote for keeping the Mexico-Brazil templates, some people want to delete ithem and as far as today it has 3 votes against 2 in favour (main and yours), I believe we have one or two days more, till an administrator reviews the case and makes his decision, so the sooner you can get some of the brazilian contributors to vote, the better. Supaman89 20:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brazilian day.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Brazilian day.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC) [edit] Brazil mapI'm saw your Brazil's map, is really nice. But it is possible for you to change the map format from SVG to PNG, also a blank map without colors? Hoping you can reply me. Thanks! --Aleenf1 14:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC) [edit] Duas CarasDo you have any references to verify this article you just created? —— Eagle101Need help? 04:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Programa do JôA tag has been placed on Programa do Jô, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template [edit] Human Development Index mapThank you for the map, but I'm having difficulty making out the red. Maybe I'm color blind, but can you please try to make the red a little less muted on Image:UN_Human_Development_Report_2007_(1).png. Thank you! ☆ CieloEstrellado 22:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [edit] List of countries by HDIIt was ok when you decided to ask me in my discussion page why the arrows are needed in both columns; However, after I had explained there very well why they are really needed - you did not respond. It's ok not to respond, but then - it is unfair to behave unilaterally and remove the arrows in spite of my unresponded explanation. In my opinion, the arrows are usefull in both columns. Please consult in the discussion page before removing them. Thank you in advance. Eliko (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC) [edit] FLC nomHello. Just notifying you that when nominating articles for FL status, adding {{FLC}} to the article's talk page and then creating the nomination is preferred, as it avoids any possible problems that comes up. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 20:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC) [edit] PedidosOlá Felipe Você criou vários templates para as bandeiras dos estados do Brasil. Mas já existem uns templates padronizados quê fazem exatamente o mesmo, você poderia solicitar a remoção dos que você criou? E ví que você está fazendo umas modificações nas listas dos estados. Está ficando bem legal, mas você poderia usar a tabela ordenável, assim como foi feito na lista por área? Fica mais fácil visualizar por partes. Obrigado — Guilherme (t/c) 16:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Images in Brazil articleAs ilustrações enriquecem tanto o verbete! Qual é o seu objetivo em apagar tantas fotografias? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MigraineBigBoy (talk • contribs) 17:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GloboOlá Felipe! Estou tentando voltar. Tenho algumas idéias de trabalho e vi que algumas semanas atrás você pediu ajuda. Como posso ajudar? Sparks1979 (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Crime against foreigners in IndiaHi, I have created an article Crime against foreigners in India, but some user has nominated it for deletion claiming it non-notable. If you are interested in the subject, you can post your opinion here. Thanks and regards. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
That is not vote-canvassing. This is to inform another user who is interested in tourism. User Ghanadar galpa IS BUSY TO SPREAD A DIRTY PROPAGANDA AGAINST ME AND MY ARTICLES. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC) [edit] Beware of user Ghanadar galpaPlease let me aware you of user Ghanadar galpa. User Ghanadar galpa seems to be an irrational Indophilic propagandist. See the Talk:Human rights in India. There he have falsely accused me that I have violated WP:CIVIL by boldifying words and refering him in third person in a article talk page? He had added POV texts in Human rights in India page. Custodial death is very high in India, torture in widespread in police custody. But user Ghanadar galpa tried to make it seems like that the police is innocent and the custodial deaths are exaggerated. In the Custodial death section of that article, he added texts like "The media in India enjoys a wide measure of freedom and has enormous reach and power. Technological advances witnessed during the last few decades have provided the media with new abilities hitherto denied them", which I later deleted. He is accusing me that I am not neutral. But the truth is that, it seems user Ghanadar galpa cannot tolerate any article or text which depict human rights violation in India, which depict violence against non-Indian religions in India. As I am trying to bring the truth in light, he is accusing me that I am not neutral. In India, violence against Christians by Hindu-nationalists is a issue. Conversion to Christianity or trying to convert someone to Christianity may result in death in India. His motivation is very clear. He is using wikipedia as a tool to spread a dirty Indophilic propaganda. See this[5]. He have just whitewashed the mention of anti-Indian sentiment in Sri Lanka. Why? Seems very clear. He could not tolerate the texts "The atrocities committed by the Indian Peacekeeping Force and support for LTTE in southern India".
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rio 2016 provisory logo.gif)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC) [edit] Fair-UseFala conterrâneo! Eu também sou do Brasil, porém edito somente na Wikipédia em português. [edit] Life in BrazilOlá Felipe! [edit] hiHi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Big Brother Brasil.pngThanks for uploading Image:Big Brother Brasil.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Brazil and MacauRealmente quero criar uma relação article:Foreign entre Brasil e Macau. Infelizmente não sei muito sobre Brasil. Se você não se lembrar, por favor crie um artigo para isto? Coloane (talk) 05:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:BC NominationA tag has been placed on Template:BC Nomination requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>). Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] BrazilianYes I am Brazilian, however I am not speake english. Please it does not erase that table, therefore it gave work very to me to make. Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Pelo visto com você não existe discussão, mantenha o artigo da forma que quiser, vou voltar pro meu lugar que é a Wikipédia Lusófona. Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] BrazilCara, eu não sei o que tá acontecendo--mas esse artigo tá horrendo. Passou de 300kb o arquivo e ganhou mais de mil palavras de prosa quando a gente sabia durante o GA que ele estava grande demais. Por mais que seja interessante aprofundar o conteúdo, isso deve ser feito nos sub-articles, não o artigo principal. Veja o talk page do Brazil.--Dali-Llama (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] VandalismHi! As per this page ("Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred"), Opinoso can remove comments from his own talk page, but he is wrong accusing you of vandalism, as your messages were not vandalism. --Carioca (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Olá! De acordo com esta página ("A política não proíbe usuários de remover comentários de suas próprias páginas de discussão, apesar de que arquivar é preferido"), Opinoso pode remover comentários de suas própria página de discussão, mas ele está errado em acusar você de vandalismo, já que suas mensagens não foram vandalismo. --Carioca (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Globo Network - Pan American Games.png)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] 3RR
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Image-Globo Network HD (Soccer).PNG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Carnaval HD Globo.PNG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] MapI prefer my map because every county is differentiated from the other. That means that they are different colors and (in this case) are very easy to find and understand its position with the other countries around it. The map that you are replacing it with is just wrong. It is all one color and that makes it hard to determine witch country is witch. I do, however, like the ones you did for the individual countries. The map that you are trying to replace mine with only works better when showing the position of one country as a single identity. Articles that describe multiple nations look better with a multicolor image.[18][19] — NuclearVacuum 23:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] Re: Template:Y/NHello there. I understand why you don't like them, but this is what it was made for. This is part of the Help:Sorting section of Wikipedia, and a simply "--" doesn't seem to be working for me. A "--" gives the reasoning that there is no information on this topic. Since the [edit] Re:Potential superpowersObrigado pelo convite, mas eu não tenho base para dar palpite sobre o assunto. O artigo em questão discursa sobre potencialidades. Quem diria que uma ilha com excesso de população e falta de recursos naturais, depois de perder uma guerra e ser ocupada, um dia seria uma super-potência econômica? Mas olhe para o Japão de hoje. O Brasil, ainda numa fase inicial de industrialização, depende da agricultura. Não conseguiu aclimatizar o trigo que importa da Argentina e não controle o clima. O artigo precisa de ser re-escrito com um título menos "guerra fria" e análises mais objetivas. Sempre desconfie quando algo começa com "academics predict..." ou "scientists say...". Abraços, Bill--Wloveral (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] SVG?How do you make a svg map like the ones you did? — NuclearVacuum 21:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] Potential superpowersOlá! Obrigado pelo convite para participar na discussão, mas não sei o bastante sobre o assunto para dar qualquer opinião construtiva. Mas para a próxima, estamos às ordens! Goldencako 23:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] IndiaIndia is in the list as an emerging great power until you introduced Brazil and put India to that list. It's incorrect. I don't have objections for you entering Brazil to the list, but dragging India to a list that it did not belong to cannot be agreed. Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Another point I will bring to your notice is that India already is an economic power, similar to Japan and Germany. Also is in the category of Russia which is already considered as a great power in nominal terms. So we can conclude India as a Great economic power. Then why is added below Japan and Germany in overall terms.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Do you know the reason for the P5 to be considered as Great powers and how this grouping came into existence. It's nuclear weapons. India not inside the NPT is the only reason to keep it inside the P5. Will it make any change in the capability terms compared to the P5.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC) That's the point. We are not adding India as a great power to the list. We are considering her as an emerging Great power. Great power is not about the pinning of the P5 medal on the chest. It's about being recognised as one. Already the world powers recognize this and is acting accordingly. Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC) You said, it's a reality, no permeanant seat, no great power. Going by this logic, only India can be a a a great power and become a P5, since it has nuclear weapons. Brazil, Germany, and Japan did not have nuclear weapons and we don't hear anything about them planning to develop one. So how can these nations will ever become a great power. They will not even belong to a potential GP.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Do you know that India is being welcomed into the nuclear club. Already the P5 has recognised India as a responsible nuclear power. But how can you club India which is in a particular league with other nations. Provide reason.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 02:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC) If you consider India to be a potential Global power, I had to remove all other nations in the list, since they are not nuclear powers. They are ineligible to be called a potential power if India is in the list of a potential power. And if India is in the list of emerging great power, we can conclude that the other nations can be potential great power.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] The Brazil Star
[edit] Potential SuperpowersOlá João! Como andam as coisas? Estou trabalhando e estudando muito esse ano, logo tenho tido pouquíssimo tempo para projetos paralelos como a Wikipedia. Venho aqui mais como leitor do que como editor, e mesmo assim tenho acessado o Wikipedia só de vez em quando. Acho que no ano que vem as coisas tenderão a melhorar. Quanto à página "potential superpowers", vi que há intensas polêmicas por lá. Desde 2007 já havia decidido não trabalhar mais em páginas mergulhadas em debates e discussões. Veja tudo que aconteceu na página do Brazil. Ela já poderia ter sido um FA article muito tempo atrás, mas devido a brigas e intolerâncias, o negócio não vai para frente. Tudo isso dá muito trabalho e raramente se alcança uma conclusão produtiva. Como editor, passei a preferir ficar longe de páginas polêmicas. Abraços e boa sorte! Sparks1979 (talk) 13:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC) [edit] Re: UnasulOlá Felipe
[edit] Página "Brazil"Você tem razão. Aquela pronucnia se adequa ao inglês RP, mas acho que valeria por a pronuncia no português do Brasil. Saudações --Aramaicus (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] Brazil como FADei uma olhada e parece que não vai passar. O pessoal tá implicando com as referências. Desde a última vez em que trabalhei na página (na época daquela briga das fotos na parte de esportes) parece que andaram mexendo muito nas referências e fizeram vários erros. É uma pena, pois quando fiz a revisão delas vários meses atrás tinha deixado tudo acertado. Bom, de qualquer modo, ainda acho que a página não está "pronta", pois há os problemas de tamanho e estabilidade. Ainda há discussão referente aos "social issues" em pleno andamento, e os revisores já "plotaram" isso. Sparks1979 (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] City templatesI apologize for my actions. But I believe we need to fix the infobox so that the images are not in the middle. Is it possible if we fix this little problem? -- NuclearVacuum 19:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Stop adding your own template to all the country articles. No one likes it. Nikkul (talk) 03:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] Template:Largest cities of Australia AustraliaI've reverted your most recent changes at Template:Largest cities of Australia. Specifiying the "core city" is WP:OR. The city name should be as listed in the citation because those cities do not have defined "core cities". As I've already explained in a previous edit summary, placing the images in the "middle" of the table causes the table to look lopsided when the cities are correctly named. At Australia, I've changed the article so it uses the template rather than an embedded table. If you're going to use an embedded table, what's the point of the template? As several editors have reverted your edits now, you should not make further changes but should discuss proposed changes at Template talk:Largest cities of Australia and/or Talk:Australia. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC) [edit] Brazilian NavyCan you update the Brazilian Navy article. I cannot do it since there is limited English sources that I can read and then update the article. I hope that you will be able to read many articles about the Brazilian Navy in native language and then get a good idea about the Brazilian Navy, which will help you to update the article. Chanakyathegreat (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RE: BrazilYes, I will be glad to help, mostly I expect with topics related to the Brazilian Amazon.--Wloveral (talk) 14:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Unfortunately I won't be able to help due to lack of free time. jggouvea (talk) 23:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC) |
![[18]](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nuclear_weapons.png){kind=link}
![[19]](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Superpowers_11.PNG){kind=link}