User talk:Avineshjose

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 /image /help page 1

Start new topics at the bottom, click here

Contents

[edit] Thanks

Avinesh,

Just a word of appreciation, it appears you're doing good work clearing up some of the cruft that has accumulated in Kerala-related articles. Relata refero (talk) 19:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your comments. I think this is the first time I get an appreciation since I’d been editing and doing all these general cleanups. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
No problem. Could you do me a favour and have a look at T. U. Kuruvilla? And if there's anything else that's an obvious source, drop me a line? Relata refero (talk) 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] apologies

Please see my further comment at the deletion review. i was too cryptic. I think it was a perfectly reasonable nomination, and you did nothing at all wrong in nominating it, or in the way you nominated it. But see there for why I think there should be a relisting.DGG (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] The Working Man's Barnstar

The Working Man's Barnstar
For your efforts on removing various non-notable genealogical articles from wikipedia. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I saw you nominated various Kerala-related non-notable genealogical articles for deletion. This is necessary, it helped to maintain wikipedia's quality standard. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Avinesh Jose  T  04:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Government of Kerala

I had to revert your changes to Government of Kerala. Fair-use images require a detailed fair-use rationale, as per WP:IUP, for each use. --Yamla (talk) 04:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd to revert your changes also since the image is back with proper copyright. --Avinesh Jose  T  08:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath

I have the book Bhashathilakam published by the University of Kerala with me. If you are so keen to see it I will get it scanned send the pages which contain the article of Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath. About his work Daivajanam please try a google search for daivanam and see the website of carmel international publishing house add then 'find on this page' daivajanam. www.ciph.com/books Please try also www.omanmalankaracatholics.blogspot.com Please search in www.worldcat.or for daivajanam But the name of the author is transliterated.Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Scanned Pages

Please find the scanned pages of Bhashathilakam. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 03:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Daivajanam

I would suggest that you put a {{merge}} tag on this article proposing that it be merged into the article on the author. I do not have a clear opinion on whether the article on the author should be kept although I am inclined towards Deletion (and I am an inclusionist!). In any event, if Daivajanam belongs in Wikipedia, it does not merit an article unto itself. If it belongs in Wikipedia at all, it should be as part of the article on the author.

--Richard (talk) 04:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

The latter one ([author]) is under AfD discussion. So it is better to wait and make a decision based on the result. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Avinesh Jose,
Please find the scanned image of the review on Daivajanam. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Richard, I've placed merge tag & requesting your comment there. --Avinesh Jose  T  06:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Santhosh George Kulangara and Sancharam

Hello, Can you please write about Santhosh George Kulangara and Sancharam in Malayalam Wikipedia also.Thanks in advance--Anoopan (talk) 06:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I will try when I'm free. --Avinesh Jose  T  06:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Courtesy notification

Just letting you know that Tinucherian has raised an incident here. Orderinchaos 07:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks orderinchaos. --Avinesh Jose  T  10:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK: Chelembra Bank Robbery

Updated DYK query On 4 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chelembra Bank Robbery, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--PFHLai (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I agree

Your wordings were more proper to the context. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashrafmedia (talk • contribs) 10:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peer review feedback

Hi, I noticed you have a request in at peer review which has not yet received any response besides the semi-automated script. Have you tried requesting a peer review from the volunteers list? Another idea you might want to try is to review someone else's request (particularly one from the list of requests without responses), then ask that they look at your request. Hope these are helpful suggestions and help to get some feedback for your request soon, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. Actually, I ignored watchlisting it and checked the JavaScript result now. I will make the enhancement based on it. As you’d suggested, I will try other possible options also. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
I keep track of peer review requests that have no responses yet here: Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I do the peer review myself if no one else does and will get to yours in several days. Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 12:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re to your message for removal of honda x11

I do think you were right on the suggestion made to remove the article on honda x11. The main purpose of my creating it was to prevent the title of this super bike left unanswered. In a short notice I would change the article into a more elaborate and meaningful one. Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Realkarthik (talk • contribs) 04:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] To Mr Avinesh Jose

Hello, Mr. Avinesh Jose. To briefly introduce myself, my name is Sean Kim and I currently work in South Korea company related to researching and understanding India's government. I was searching for information about Kerala's government through the Internet and I have noticed that you were the last person to update information about Kerala in Wikipedia. If you can spare a little time of explaining the State Government of Kerala, I would be very pleased. I'm curious of how State Government of Kerala is organized. I would like to know who is in control of the departments (ranked position from top to bottom). So far, I understand that the governor is in charge of the state, the chief minister is the head of the Council of Ministers. What I would like to know is who is in charge of each departments. Is it the state council of ministers or the central government ministers or the secretary to departments? I am very confused of the ranked position of one particular state's government. To put this in order, first is governor, second is chief minister, third is Council of Ministers. I'm not sure after that; the lower ranked positions. If you can help me please reply to kim.hanseul@hotmail.com. Thank you for your time and consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.76.164.201 (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd updated Government of Kerala based on your query. Hope you get more info from here also. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose  T  08:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

The comment was mine to begin with, and I added it as an explanation for my initial opinion. So I'm not sure why you and Harjk are telling me to stop moving other people's comments. I haven't moved anyone's comments, just mine. --vi5in[talk] 22:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Because, it was in my watchlist since I’d participated in the first AfD discussion. In the second AfD, I undid your edit to make it in a chronological order in order to taking the confusion out of closing admin. (because I noticed that you pushed your comments above Tomb’s comment after he commented as per recorded time & tomb wants it to be stay behind the same). Please check the time & see who edited first. Therefore, I think that my undo (tried resolving edit war?) was logical and reasonable. --Avinesh Jose  T  04:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I understand that your intentions were good, but in future please don't move other people's comments. I didn't "push" my comments above Tomb's. He was complaining that I posted my vote because of JNN, so I added my comment as an explanation TO my vote. But when I did it the first time, I wrongly added it as a reply to Tomb, which wasn't what I intended. Chronological order doesn't necessarily mean "logical" ordering either. I really don't care what Tomb wants. He doesn't seem to understand edit histories well. If you look at the diff, you will see that I made the initial comment, and I moved it. Assuming you have the following ordering of comments:
  • A (time x)
  • B (time x + 1)
  • C (time x + 2)
  • D (time x + 3)
A person E can reply to any particular post above and you can end up with the following:
  • A (time x)
  • B (time x + 1)
  • E (time x + 4)
  • C (time x + 2)
  • D (time x + 3)
  • E (time x + 5)
So if you try to order everything chronologically, the thread would lose its meaning. --vi5in[talk] 15:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment by Tomb: Sorry User:Vivin, your logic was completely blundering and not acceptable by me or others. Let me just elaborate it:

1) A (time x) You commented this: Delete - Not notable enough... yet. --vi5in[talk] 16:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

2) B (time x + 1) I commented: WP:JNN, Possible bad faith comment by User:Vivin (NotableGuru per WP:JNN). He/she has a bad faith track of targetting my edit and falsely commenting. Check the contributions for more details. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 04:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

3) Here the problem was. You should have commented to the B (time x + 1) instead of dragging my comment to the down (that was reverted by Avineshjose) and adding your comment. You did that because you knew that your comment was made by WP:ABF and trying to hide it.

So it is better, if you could take off some time and learn more about how to edit WP. In future, please don't move other people's comments. Hope this helps in your case. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 05:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop asking me to "take time off". I'm more than aware of Wikipedia policies, and frankly it's quite amusing coming from someone who has barely any grasp of Wikipdia policies or the inevitable consequence of adding a line above another in a body of text (it drags it "to the down" as you so eloquently put it). I'm not going to bother with this anymore, especially with someone who can't understand something this simple. For the last time. I never moved your comment. I moved mine. Seriously... I thought I had seen everything. Avinesh, thanks for trying to help. --vi5in[talk] 15:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Malankara church

Hi Avinesh , You definitely have no idea about the History of Christianity in India. Malankara Church is the original church established by St. Thomas in India. It was undivided until 15th century - later it become different denominations Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church,Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church,Malankara Catholic Syrian Church,Syro-Malabar Catholic Church etc during the course of history. It is very clear understandable you are still continuing doing things in bad faith ...( The latest one is the merger proposal ) . Let me know what is ur problem ? -- ₮inucherian (Talk) - 09:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • No, no bad faith. I'd come across it & noticed the problem. Just see that both article looks almost same. If there are two articles created with same contents, don't you think that it should be merged. --Avinesh Jose  T  13:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] unblock request moved here

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This user created a sock to edit in ANI. This is not permitted. Out of courtesy, I am moving his complaint to an unblock request.... This is about a sock case. I have no idea about who is User:Harjk. The nominator and blocked admin seem to be confused over my connection with Harjk as a check user would have showed some ‘likely’ result. I am a business man who uses a shared ip address connected with a number of computers. In my office, everyone knows that I am a wikipedian and we use WP a lot in order to get piece of valuable information. It is possible that some of the shared techies may have tracked my contributions & trying to ‘help’ me. The same incident happened when I was previously accused of sock puppet that I clearly explained to then closing admin. Anyway, I am not going to find who did it at all as long as it is not a major issue talking about my business. About blocking, how can an admin block a well known editor without even listening from the concerned editor? The nominator and the blocked admin could have leaved a message in my talk pg or over email. It is noted that the admins decision was in hurriedly, without listening my comment. He/she should wait for a 5-6 days, before reaching to a conclusion. It was unfair and miserable from an admin who not suppose to do it, in my opinion. The nominator User:Vivin commented in the [Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Avineshjose evidence page] that, I thought it was a bit odd seeing as he had never involved himself in that particular AfD before. The statement is wrong, as I have participated in the previous nomination previous AfD, I am much interested to know the result of it. Moreover, I did not give votes anywhere where harjk had participated. Therefore, no reason for doubting me as sock. comment posted by User:avineshjose as I am blocked & unable to edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.18.136 (talk) 05:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "This request does not convince me that the block was made in error. — Sandstein (talk) 12:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Avineshjose, please also see Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Roommates_and_sharing_an_IP_address. We have limited means of separating real people on the same network.--chaser - t 19:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Just to say hai

Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a new friend. Cheers, and happy editing! -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[edit] Labour India


  • If you don't find anything wrong with the following sentence, then leave out the business of copy editing or templating to others.

It brings out educational monthly journals in three different languages, ranging from the pre-primary level to Plus Two level and the entrance exams in every month.

Uzhuthiran (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

  • It is better if you could edit the article instead of simply talking about it/adding temps. It has been already edited by many and still you want to add the template. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)