User talk:AndreNatas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is AndreNatas's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to AndreNatas.
Archives: 1
  • Inactive dicussions off previous months are archived.
  • From now when a message is posted here I will reply on this page to save time and keep the dicussion together.

User talk:AndreNatas/Archive 1


Contents

[edit] Liberal Democrats

How did you manage to revert so fast? It was as fast as lightning! Kudos. 79.73.45.103 (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Now if you understood late-1980s British politics, well, then, you'd understand. Septics, where would we be without them? Without Obama on our prospective plates, anyway.

Just Google "Margaret Thatcher" and "ex-parrot". Go on. You know you want to. 79.73.45.103 (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks...

...for the revert on my talk page. D Justin Eiler (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfA - Discospinster

Thank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster talk 23:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fine

You may have kinda cheated, but here you go:

The Super Secret Barnstar
This user has found  RyRy5 's Secret Page! Who will be next? Can you find my Secret Page? Ver. 2.5

I suggest adoption since your kinda new here. If you don't know what it is, feel free to ask at my talkpage.--RyRy5 (talk) 02:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you need any help at all, please just ask me at my talkpage. Good luck editing!--RyRy5 (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting users blanking thier talk page

Please don't do this. Established users can blank their talk pages if they want to. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 19:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Apologies, my mistake. AndreNatas (talk) 19:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User warnings

Hi, I see that you revert vandalism, just to inform you that it's conventional to warn vandals. This is part of the process of cleaning up vandalism. They are four levels of warnings, in case of vandalism after last warning, the user is reported to WP:AIV so he can be blocked. Cenarium (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] alright

I'm sorry geez, that seriously wasn't ment as a vandalism and neither is this, I just thought it was pretty funny, but I had my fun and now satisfied King food (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thank you for tagging the talk page for 163.153.15.27. The district reports that they have identified the student involved and that they are taking appropriate action. --NERIC-Security (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please refrain from adding comments back

Please refrain from adding back in comments as you have been doing to User_talk:209.169.244.29 I have reverted the page to its previous state.Ripster40 (talk) 22:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I only followed an admin, who was also reverting. AndreNatas (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RFA thanks

Thanks for the support
Thanks for your early support on my request for adminship. It passed 92/2/2, and I hope to remain as helpful, friendly, constructive and useful as you claim I am, particularly with my nifty new set of tools. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: RFA

I'm sorry, but I cannot accept your RFA. I don't think it's quite that time yet. I know a lot of users will be looking for major contributions in my contribution list (which they will have a hard time finding). Maybe next time, though. --EoL talk 22:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, slipped my mind. --EoL talk 21:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
now once i delete something off my page you do not have the right to revert it back...i dont care who it is from or what is about....anoymous....

[edit] KEFW

Thanks for reverting recent vandalism to KEFW, although further edits have been made that are vandalism. Can you please revert them? Alex Holowczak (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem, and thankyou. :) Alex Holowczak (talk) 18:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the support

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

[edit] What are you talking about?

I don't understand a thing. Either there is a problem in my broser application or Wikipedia has a problem with some users only.116.48.108.40 (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Grawp

You should know that Grawp has used hundreds of sockpuppets and endless IPs from all over the world. He is a long-term professional vandal. I would welcome your assistance in reverting his edits; he's been targeting the edits of specific editors, including me. If you look at my edits and look for ones that have be undone by an IP or a brand new account, you'll have found Grawp. I'll warn you, though; you'll have your pages vandalized and may earn more of his attention. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I just left a note for User:Thatcher, a checkuser looking at this case; the other checkuser is User:Alison and you should see
Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for you help here; I'm done for today. Cheers, Jack Merridew 15:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:RachelMarsden

I don't think you should be removing content from there at this time. Just let her have her say and move on... Martinp23 16:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I have just posted that as my reply on ANI. AndreNatas (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] First

Don't tell me what to do because you are nobody. Second, why can't I speak to her? --Damifb (talk) 16:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

The thing is I've been trying to be blocked and nobody will do it. What I have to do? Kill a user? Plus, I would like to see what seh answers.

--Damifb (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Long time no see. I was just on RC patrol and I decided to stop by. I'm the one who suggested adoption before and gave you my barnstar. I know you didn't want it before but, will you be my 5th adoptee? I improved my signature and my userpage. I have 2200+ edits now (last time I only had about 900).--RyRy5 talk 17:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

You can also participate in my Adoption Program too. It's actually really helpful. Tell me when you have decided.--RyRy5 talk 17:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't really matter how long you have been on wikipedia. What matters is your experience. For example, your edit count. I know I have alot more experience than you because your edit count is 1200 edits lower than mine. That's 1 reason why people have been asking me to adopt them.--RyRy5 talk 17:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, really only I can manage my adoption program because I'm teaching my adoptees. Sorry. Well, while I'm still here. Do you have the rollback feature yet, since you think your more experienced than me?--RyRy5 talk 17:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Well I have the feature too (that didn't solve anything...). So, if you want to help out and not join, what do you plan to do? I have been also nominated for Adminship, twice (how about you?).--RyRy5 talk 17:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I didn't accept the nominations by the way. Well, I changed my mine on adopting you, but didn't you say you wanted to help out in the program? If you want to help, what would you do?--RyRy5 talk 17:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hired?

If I'm going to hire you, you should take one of my tests. So far, 2 out of 3 have passed the test I may give you. Do you want to try it?--RyRy5 talk 17:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Before I give you the test, remember that you need at least a B to pass. Oh, and do you know how to organize your messages like how I have been giving you messages?--RyRy5 talk 17:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, it's using colons in front of your message. Look at the section above and you should see how each message I give you are going in a stair-like picture. Archiving is something else. I'll explain later, anyway, here is your test:

--RyRy5 talk 17:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

You Passed! Sorry for me being a little mean during these last few messages.--RyRy5 talk 17:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, 90% plus the extra credit, 120%. Good Job! Now, may I teach you something first? Your not my adoptee, but you have to learn this.--RyRy5 talk 17:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Colons

You always have to use this while sending messages. Example:This is what you are doing when sending messages.

  1. This is example 1 without the colon in front of your message.
  2. No Colon This is exaple 1
  3. No Colons This is example

Example:This what you should be doing.

  1. First message
  2. 1 colon second message
  3. 2 colon third message

Eample:This is what it should look like. Hi, I'm RyRy5--RyRy5 talk 18:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I like baseball--RyRy5 talk 18:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I also like wikipedia--RyRy5 talk 18:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your kindness--RyRy5 talk 18:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Do you see how the messages are getting further away from eachother?--RyRy5 talk 18:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
That's it.--RyRy5 talk 18:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Molag Bal (2).

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Black Kite 02:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not Molag Bal, have you seen the edits I have made? AndreNatas (talk) 11:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Molag Bal (2). — Sandstein (talk) 11:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I deserve to be unblocked, when you transform an article from this [1] to [2] this in over an hour."

Decline reason: "Not when you're a banned user — Chris 12:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] April GA Newsletter

The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter

The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Good articles newsletter

Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)