User talk:Cenarium

[edit] Thank you from Horologium

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed unanimously with the support of 100 editors. Your kindness is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Wizardman, Black Falcon and jc37 for nominating me. — Horologium

[edit] Thanks

for your vote of confidence and support on my RFA. I really appreciate them and will try not to disappoint! Let me know if I can help in any way... but give me some time to figure out how to do it!! --Slp1 (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

I just wanted to thank you for reverting the vandalism on Uranus caused by someone using an I.P. router to impersonate me back in April. Do you know of any ways to prevent this from happening again? Thanks again - Falcon537 (talk) 03:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

The page has been semi protected until the 24th of July, so we won't have problems like this for a while. Cenarium (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Welcoming

Ok, thanks.-- Barkjon  17:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 'Ralph Renick' Biography

I just wanted to thank you very much for cleaning up my entries on the biography of newscaster Ralph Renick and in making the article suitable in style for the Wikipedia community. Also, thanks for finishing the photo upload that I could not figure out.

Can you tell me at what point the warning at the top of the page that says "this article has numerous issues" will disappear now that you have addressed the issues?

Again, thanks very much for your help..

Thecardsaysmoops (talk) 01:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Eliezer Silver article

^{Superscript text} i am a decendant of this rabbi, there has been alot of vandalism to this article in the past and this article sadly was used as a forum for personal attacks by another distant family member against the family, all and any of the infomation that was put in the article by this person was not only false but had nothing to do with this great rabbi and do only but place a negative point on this article about tis true giant of american and world judaism.

at a time there was a lock on this article so that it could not be editidet as these had been and edit war as i had to monitor the articlee daily to remove any hateful attcks, but i have noticed this lock has beed removed for whatever reason, can you please reinstate the lock on editing and can this be made permanenet you can look at this history to see the rediculous attack for your self

please help —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.227.4 (talk) 15:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I'll try to keep an eye on the article. Unprotection is not so bad, it gives you the opportunity to edit the page, and allow constructive contributions from IPs and new users. However, if the vandalism level becomes too high, then we'll protect the page again. We generally don't protect pages for ever. Cenarium (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

thanks much appreciated, if you look back and see the history of the article you will see the abbility to edit this article was abused for personal attack not relating to the article and also to put here say and false info about the subject of the article

thanks again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.227.4 (talk) 15:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok. For your information, you can use the preview button before saving a page. When you reply, you just have to add several : at the beginning of your post, it will automatically add the same number of small spaces. If you type a space, it will make a sort of box. Also, please sign your comments on a talk page. Cheers, Cenarium (talk) 16:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Seriously

Are you warning yourself about deletions of pages you created during clean up after vandalism?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 14:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Nope, this is a bug of Twinkle. I forgot about this. Cenarium (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kyle E. Cyote

Users are allowed to edit their userpages, but the MfD tag prohibits blanking. Does the cover the user the page belongs to as well? Ironholds 04:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know, there's a contradiction indeed. We'll see the result of the MfD and, considering the recent vandalism, the page should be deleted anyway. Cenarium (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted per your request

Hey there Cenarium, I just deleted several subpages of Portal:Lego per your request at CSD. Just wanna make sure you really did want them gone. Also, I actually thought you were an admin - are you an admin? If not, why not? How long have you been here? Are you interested in adminship? Is anything holding you back from it? You can answer here, I'll watchlist this page. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Keeper. Yeah, I mistakenly created them as subpages of /selected picture instead of /selected article. I'm not an admin, I've never been nominated at WP:RFA. I've been here for 6 months now. Well, I thought about adminship for some time now and I think I'd be helpful as an administrator. Thanks for asking me, Cenarium (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Has anyone offered to nominate you before? You meet my criteria for adminship, and I'd be happy to nominate you myself. Do you know of anyone that would be willing to co-nominate that I can ask on your behalf? I just looked at your edit report, in two places, and I don't see any glaring issues, but instead I see a dedicated editor that could use the extra buttons. Bonus points for having a clean blocklog. Go look at a couple of the current RFAs, and take a peak at the first three questions that are "mandatory". Keeping in mind that someone will always oppose any candidate, and keeping in mind that RFA is a rather hellish, stressful environment that requires you to basically be online and ready to answer added questions for 7 days, if you want a nom, you got one from me. I'll watch your page for your response. However, if there is any chance that you would "quit" Wikipedia because of a failed nomination (they happen all the time, and to good editors), then I won't nominate. Let me know, and cheers, I'm going offline here any minute, I'll check back here in the morning... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Also, I'll add, see this. (look at the bottom) I don't nominate "just anybody". I'm very careful about who I pursue. If you seriously want a nomination, let me know. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I've not been offered nomination before. I gladly accept yours, thanks. I don't know if someone is interested in co-nominate. I certainly won't quit for a failed nomination, don't worry. Cenarium (talk) 22:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. I'm going to have a dig through your contribs today, I'll set up this when I'm done. When that link goes blue, I'll return to your talkpage to let you know and "officially" notify you that you need to answer some questions :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)