User talk:All Hallow's Wraith/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Katharine Isabelle

I have studied the mosbio and associated pages, and have rewritten and restructured the KI and EP pages accordingly. It says that place of birth and nationality SHOULD be included in the opening paragraph. It does it state that after the opening name that one should use surname only, but, as with everything else, it is only a recommendation, not a hard and fast rule. Therefore the pages are in general accordance with the guidelines now - and rather good they look too. I would appreciate it if you would leave them alone now. Just so you know, I will, in turn, be expanding the Bio sections, and continue to maintain them as I have for some time now. Lost Girls Diary 02:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Just a note to say I emailed a good number of interested parties from outwith wikipedia, and they were dismayed to hear what you are up to. They promised me they would enrol here, and would when necessary prevent you from doing your worst. I have no idea whether they enrolled or not, nor whether they will be true to their word, But I have known these people for some time, and I guess time will tell whether they are interested enough to help maintain the page in a decent fashion. The decision rests with them Lost Girls Diary 20:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rosie Malek-Yonan

Thank you for working on Rosie Malek-Yonan's page. However, I see that you've removed all links to her credits. When I first created this page, I was asked to add all links. I painstakingly went through every credit and added the IMDb links. I am going to revert those edits. Zayya 06:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thank for that. Then I won't revert to the IMDb links. Can you please help me with the link for Rendition? This is the Wiki page I'm trying to link it to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendition_%28film%29 . Regards, Zayya 06:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
AHHH Thanks very much! That works! Zayya —Preceding comment was added at 06:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ken Foree page

AHW, the Ken Foree wiki is an authorized version of his bio provided specifically for wikipedia by Ken himself. The Images, text and all related links have been licensed to wikipedia for use by me, his webmaster. If this editing you deem so necessary continues, I will remove all licensing to wikipedia and all articles & images. Any use of said information thereafter will be deemed copyright infringement. I have worked with Wikipedia admins closely over the past 4-6 months to create a simple clean wiki for interested individuals to gain information from, that is sourced and 100% accurate. Your changing of the order, wording or links is a direct violation of the licensing. I have looked at your contributions and it seems to me that you have taken it upon yourself to make many unnecessary changes to wikipedia pages relating to cast members of the Rob Zombie HALLOWEEN remake. I have asked you a second time now, to refrain from making any further changes, there will be no third request.DC 00:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No longer an issue

I have more than enough with those who can "change information at will" and have removed all articles related to Kens site and Biography. Create it all from scratch for all I care, but any use of information relating to the previous biography will be deemed copyright infringement as I will be sending a note of this to an admin. All licensing to Wikipedia has been revoked and I wash my hand of this waste of web space. When a celebrity must jump throgh hoops to have his wiki report accurately and on a regular basis users come forth to "make adjustments", it's no longer useful, but a waste of effort.DC 00:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar! :)

The Editor's Barnstar
In recognition of your impressive mainspace contributions, dear All Hallow's Wraith, I award you this Editor's Barnstar. Thanks so much for your help to the project, and I hope you keep up your wonderful work on expanding and cleaning up articles. Best wishes, PeaceNT 08:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shoot em Up punctuation edit

I have reverted your edit of Shoot 'Em Up, but since I do not believe your intent was to vandalize I thought I ought to explain the revert. Punctuation is place inside quotation marks in standard American English (see the article on Quotation marks to read why. It seems to me that you are following British standard rather than American, which is certainly acceptable- except BOTH standards are considered largely acceptable on Wikipedia, and switching from British to American English and vice versa simply because of personal preference is discouraged (I can dig up the relevant WP articles if you deem it necessary). One is expected to follow what the majority of the language already present in the article dictates- and thusfar, it has been American grammar for a Canadian/American production. ChrisStansfield Contribs 22:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scout Taylor-Compton

Thanks for nominating Scout Taylor-Compton for GA status. I've been reworking the article and quite proud that someone else has noticed the progress. Thanks -Lindsey8417 20:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Patricia Charbonneau

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, All Hallow's Wraith! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 06:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Keith Nobbs edit

I removed the listing for Keith Nobbs' location of birth as Kingswood Texas. I assume you got the info from imdb. I have contacted imdb to remove the listing, as it is a mistake. Kingwood Texas is the community Nobbs grew up in, but it is not his birthplace.

[edit] Inferno

Your recent edit to the Inferno article indicates a U.S. release date of August 15, 1986, utilizing "Variety records" as a source. It would be more helpful if you could provide detailed information regarding this source, i.e., issue#, date, pg number, so others could verify, if needed. If this came from Variety online, please include a link. Thanks.-Hal Raglan 13:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Excellent. Thank you for helping to improve the quality of the article.-Hal Raglan 01:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your help

Image:WikiThanks.png Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scout Taylor-Compton

Placed some notes for improvements on the talk page to fix for GA status. I made some spelling and grammar corrections, so have stepped down as reviewer myself, and requested a second review. Good luckSriMesh | talk 02:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I've been making edits to the article in an attempt to get it to GA status as I've been a large contributor and had previously re-written the article. Thanks for the nomination on the article as well, but I believe I've already said that. -Lindsey8417 02:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blair Witch edit

Can you reliably cite your replacement of a different date for the film release? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reordering of categories

You need to get together with user Æthelwold (talk · contribs), they just change the CATS and then you do, or vica-versa. ~ WikiDon 01:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Garfield

Thanks for the spiffy formatting over at Andrew Garfield - I for one am hopeless as that sort of thing. Any chance you could create a nice table for his theatre and radio credits? It's slightly weird to have them lumped together under "stage". Amo 16:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scarlett Johansson

You're absolutely right, I thought I was changing something else-- typo. Sorry, and thanks for catching it.

Wellspring (talk) 03:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ron Canada

Hello, if you have biographical info about Ron Canada please add it. For now I'm removing the People from New York category. 76.200.144.168 (talk) 03:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tilda Swinton

You have incorrectly altered the correct and time-honoured format for the description of a spouse here, which is XXXX daughter of XXXX. Regards, David Lauder (talk) 10:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean? I have never or rarely seen anyone's parent described as "XX XX, daughter of XX XX" on Wikipedia, unless that grandparent was notable. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 10:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Then you need to look at more biographical articles. This is an encyclopaedia and the format was correct to the best of my knowledge. Its important not to stray into the 'I don't ike it' sphere. Regards, David Lauder (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I still don't understand. What are you referring to? Do you have any examples? All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 21:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alicia Keys

Hi! You have recently added a reference link to Alicia Keys's "early life" section, which contains a small passage of an article about Keys; when clicking on "View full article...", it leads to a page which requires "your Factiva user ID and password to log in", therefore this website apparently can't be used as a reference. Is there any other website that contains the same information? Funk Junkie (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I've just noticed you added two references. Both have the whole signing up thing; seems they are not accessible for everybody. Funk Junkie (talk) 21:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barnastar!

The Invisible Barnstar
Thank you, thank you, thank you. I notice many, ohh so many, of your edits; and after seeing you so often in my watchlist i thought it was time for me to give you this. Keep it up, everyone in Wikipedia (tacitly) appreciates your contributions. Yamanbaiia(free hugs!) 21:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About your edits on Corey Haim

Thanks! I was about to fix that act of vandalism, but you done it for me. Thanks a bunch. FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 22:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moving articles

Please do not move the contents of articles simply by cutting and pasting text from one to another as you did with Alexander Nathan Etel and Alex Etel today. This destroys the edit history, which is a major violation of Wikipedia's GFDL license. I'm not opposed to the move, but you should have used the "move" tab - although in this case it wouldn't have worked as the new name already existed, so you should have requested the move on WP:RM. It's unlikely that the move would have been opposed if you'd made a clear case for it, and an admin would have handled it for you. I shall try to straighten things out tomorrow. -- Arwel (talk) 00:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Susan Sarandon

Hi. As I was reviewing an issue on this page, I noted that you had weighed in about it not long ago. Would you please take a look at the Leviev entry on her talk page regarding this and weigh in on the issue if you wish? Thanks!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Rudd

In response to your edit summary of the Paul Rudd article, the reason I removed the high school info is not because the content was questionable, it was because the content had no citation or source provided. Any content that appears unsourced can be removed at any time. My reference to "unneeded info" in my edit summary was an explanation for other statements I removed, not the high school info. Either way, I have left the content in but I tagged it for references. I noticed that the source before it (an article in The Kansas City Star) does appear to have the high school information in it, but since that article can only be viewed through a paid archive, I have removed that source per WP:EL (Sites requiring registration). If you have a reliable, free source that you can add to back up the high school info, feel free to re-add it. Pinkadelica (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for adding a source to the article. Pinkadelica (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sephardi Jews

The word "denomination" does not automatically mean "religous denomination". It can mean "cultural denomination" or "geographic denomination" or "ethnic denomination" or Jewish denominations. Please remember that Judaism is both a culture and a religion. See Jewish denominations for more info.--Dr who1975 (talk) 22:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox image captions

I have noticed that you have added image captions to the infoboxes of several articles of individual people. Please keep in mind that the caption field is for specific information relating to the image (e.g. where/when the photo was shot, what the subject is doing, etc). The caption field is not mandatory and does not exist simply to repeat the subject's name. Just64helpin (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

You can also help by going back to the articles you added these name-only captions to, since I assume you can recall which ones have them. Just64helpin (talk) 13:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
The caption field is there for a reason, but that reason is not "to add a name redundantly". It is completely optional. Let us please discuss this without a revert war. Just64helpin (talk) 22:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
As for your wikistalking comment, Wikipedia:Wikistalking#Wikistalking actually states that utilizing the contribution history alone is not stalking. It's not my fault all of the name-only captions were done by you, but it is quite striking that they seem to be only from you. Just64helpin (talk) 22:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I'll admit that replacing the name-only captions with editor notes may not be the best course of action, but it was the most efficient for me at that time. I initially added photo-specifc information to name-only captions, as I did in Tom Hanks. Unfortunately, the caption was changed back to just "Tom Hanks". I tried to explain my concern about such name-only captions, and you seemed to show indifference in the matter, so I tried something else. If you feel this is wikistalking, I will stop, but I hope you will please consider using the caption field for something useful in future edits. Adding just a name is not "wrong", but that isn't the point: the burden lies in the person adding content, not the person removing it. Since I am not the only person that objects to the name-only Harrison Ford caption, I would hope that you won't simply revert, as you seem to be suggesting. Just64helpin (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Ultimately, I do not intend to follow you (or anyone else) around to add photo-specific information each time a name-only caption is added. Instead, I would hope that you will add something more than a name-only caption during your normal course of editing. My intent was to clear out the "backlog" of these instances in an efficient matter. For example, I would not want to expand 100 name-only captions just to find 150 new name-only captions added to other articles the following day. I thank you for clarifying the Tom Hanks misunderstanding, but this still leaves open Harrison Ford, as your line "I am going to revert..." leaves me puzzled. My "burden" comment referred specifically to the Ford article. Just64helpin (talk) 01:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I still don't see how adding a name-only caption makes it "consistent across Wikipedia". Just having the empty field makes it consistent -- the field does not need to be filled if specific information is unneeded or unavailable. It would be like adding "someday, eventually" to the deathdate field of a living person. Just64helpin (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I still think my deathdate example fits: the subject will pass away eventually, and there is no consensus that adding "someday, eventually" is wrong. However, common sense would indicate that specifically adding this would be useless, as this information is an obvious given. In the same sense, adding "Harrison Ford" under a photograph that is unambiguously of Harrison Ford is also useless. I really don't see where this if-there-is-a-photo-we-must-caption-it-all-costs idea comes from. Just64helpin (talk) 14:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and to clarify: the Template:Infobox actor states that "all fields are optional". Just64helpin (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, I did notice the image was uploaded by Gavatron, who has had a history of image-related copyvios. I've taken a few quick glance at Google and Flickr, and didn't find any matches. Just64helpin (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Categories

My mistake. I'll stick to unsourced statements. Karanacs (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jamie Lee Curtis

Fine and fancy citing Wikipedia Guidelines, but next time you might try actually reading them. The paragraph you continue to delete is not in violation of the WP:BLP policies, nor are the sources considered unreliable as per WP:RS (the second one, perhaps, but not the first or the last). Both sources have a solid reputation of researching their information, and both sources could be considered experts in the case of urban legends, which is exactly what the paragraph is about. The sources prove that the rumor exists and is wide-spread, and that's all that they need to prove. Neither source is, nor is required to be, an expert in the case of JLC's medical history.

I'm not going to bother fighting for it and I'll let you hide behind the "when it doubt, throw it out" policy, but all you've done is remove the honest answer to a burning question. Since you wont let me post the truth, people will continue to post the lies. More harm than good, if you ask me.

Peace- 71.57.140.239 (talk) 04:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image captions

Hi, I noticed you have added new name-only captions to several articles. Why? How can I hope to eliminate all of these if you keep making more? Just64helpin (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Um, what? You've been adding name-only captions to articles that already had infoboxes to begin with. It seems quite deliberate. Just64helpin (talk) 10:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The point is that I do not wish to follow you around with a dustpan. My goal was to eliminate the name-only captions made prior to our earlier discussion, in the hope of clearing out the "backlog". My assumption is that you would make a conscious effort to add actual captions in future edits, rather than name-only uselessness, and together we would extinguish the latter throughout Wikipedia. Do you still intend to make name-only captions? I really would like some clarification on this matter. Just64helpin (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hugh Grant

…is on hold. You can see my comments here. --Kakofonous (talk) 02:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Field removal

If a field is available in an infobox, you don't delete the contents when added to that field. You seem to be vandalizing multiple articles randomly removing things with the notation of "removing non-notable" which is a false description of what you are doing. KellyAna (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Please read the description for the "Children" section over at Template:Infobox actor. It explicitly states "Insert the names of the actor's notable children, meaning those children who meet Wikipedia's notability criteria independently of this actor". All of the names I removed did not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria independetly of their actor parent. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 23:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
You removed CITIES AND STATES using the same edit summary. Regardless, the field is in question and you're doing more harm than good. And don't reply on my talk page. KellyAna (talk) 23:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I removed the birthplace from the intro paragraph per WP:MOSBIO, something I also explained on your talk page. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[1] say: The opening paragraph should give, no where does it say it can't give additional info like where someone is born. Your removal of the city and state of birth is unjustified. KellyAna (talk) 23:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
It also doesn't say that the intro shouldn't list every single credit of the actor, so what? It's implied that, aside from nationality, birthdate, and profession, the intro should only summarize the article. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Implied means you're assuming what it says. That's not up to you to assume what it say. It doesn't say to remove the city, you can't use that to justify something you feel like doing by saying "it says to" when that's a complete lie. KellyAna (talk) 23:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I didn't say the MOSBIO "said" the city should be removed, I said that there is no basis in it for including it. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 23:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edits....Biased

I really don't like u at all. It's really hard to get information on people's heritage especially if they have any African American heritage. Many of those sources are correct I've seen or read interviews that have been done before on some of these people. They have expressed being proud of their heritage and speak up about it. You can help me find somethings since it is ridiculously hard to find the full truth about who they are...Also since u want to start removing things I suggest you start removing their AFrican American heritage as well because you just can't say we'll they're black but they have to have proof that they are of Native American descent......P.S. I suggest you start getting on top of it before I do because you really pissed me off with your selective edits.Mcelite (talk) 22:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)mcelite


Then u better start helping find some, and remove their AFrican American categories as well since those are not cited either.Mcelite (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)mcelite

It's pretty obvious that you just don't care. You just started getting nosey about 2 weeks ago, and nobody had a problem with it at all. I'm tired of BS when even people who are obviously of mixed heritage if you have any idea what certain physical features are from certain races.Mcelite (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)mcelite

Ok have any ideas...Cause some of these reliable sources are biased for ex. Ebony Magazine is pretty biased. They were so ignorant they though Zoe Saldana was African American when she is Dominican-American. This is retarded.Mcelite (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)mcelite

Well yeah you would think but when they try to get you to say ur just black or say ask an African American blah blah blah. They pushing you into saying you're just African American it biased and wrongful. They make a really big deal if you part Native American and speak about then they want blood results. It's so stupid.Mcelite (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)mcelite

Much easier to find their African American heritage than their Native American or anything else heritage isn't it. If you're gonna add that part of their heritage then I would appreciate if you would help find the rest of who they are.Mcelite (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)mcelite

[edit] Sacha Cohen

Hi, a while back you reverted my edits saying that Sacha Cohen is not a Mizrahi Jew. I gave a link, you can look at Wikipedia's list of Mizrahi Jews (no, I did not put him on the list). Here is the link Mizrahi_Jew#Entertainers.--User:Eskimospy (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] your reverts

hello. i noticed that you have gone after me making several uncommented reverts to my edits. is there something we need to talk about? --emerson7 03:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

as with most things, 'appropriateness' is the key. there's little reason for using small fonts and dual columns for just a couple entries. the article {{reflist}}, as well as wp:foot#Resizing references both suggest necessity, i.e. lack of space.
with regard to nee, forgive me if i come off too pendantic but, nee is a parenthetical adjunct to a womans married name, thus... Barbra Jean Brolin (nee Streisand), not Barbra Jean (nee Streisand). an a example of can be found here. even still, it is indeed an affectation when the same idea can be communicated with a much simpler construction. --emerson7 04:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
the level and degree to which you require 'consistency' is... not the basis for which articles should be edited. whatever your motivation, i am warning you to please cease your wp:stalking and wp:own behaviour, or you will be reported. --emerson7 05:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Username note

You have a cool username! Anyway, you may want to consider using the folliwing userbox:

This user would like to wish you a happy Hallowe'en.

. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 19:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! And thanks for the suggestion, will do. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 06:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
I should point out that, technically, "All Hallows", being plural, should have the apostrophe at the end, like this: All Hallows'. Just a note. :-) Serendipodous 08:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I actually thought about this when I was creating my account. I was pretty sure it wasn't really correct grammatically, but I decided to go with it anyway because I thought that the apostrophe before the "s" just looked a little better. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 08:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome and happy editing! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 15:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

The Red Barnstar
For all the great work you have been doing on BLPs, I salute you. David Shankbone 19:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edward Goldmith

Hi, he is a dual French /British citizen so it is not correct to just describe him as British- he was born in France and still lives there and his mother was French. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel (talk) 10:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] How Do You Feel?

Just because you "feel" one way or the other doesn't make you so. Some days I feel 20, some days I feel 80, doesn't make me either. Some days I feel like a Democrat, some days like a Republican, depends on the issue. Some days I feel constipated, some days the opposite. I would really like you to change your edit about Harrison Ford "feeling" Jewish. To be a "Jew" is not a religious question, it is an ethnic birth question. Like an Irishmen, a Laotian, an Arab, etc. Mr. Ford was just being funny, and saying that he "identified" with how certain Jewish people "feel" about the motion picture/entertainment industry. He agrees with how they run their business affairs and their political views. Nothing more. IP4240207xx (talk) 02:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I "feel" like the quotes can stay, but the category must go. Like he says: As a person he is Irish. IP4240207xx (talk) 02:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Fine, but I don't see the words Government News Site anywhere. Anyway, I'm getting tired so I'll check in later to see what the other editor decided.annoynmous 08:24, 13 May, 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paltrow

You removed an edition of the article about Gwyneth Paltrow. I added her to the Polish-American Jews category. What source do you need? The article says her ancestors were Polish Jews. Kowalmistrz (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC) It says also that Paltrow is a descendant of Polish rabbi, David HaLevi Segal of Krakow. Kowalmistrz (talk) 12:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gary Oldman GAC nomination

Hello, you nominated the Gary Oldman article at WP:GAC. I wanted to let you know that the article, which I've reviewed here, and its nomination has been on hold for six days with no changes/updates in regards to my comments. If no action is taken in the next couple of days, I will have to fail the article. María (habla conmigo) 12:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Having not heard from you, or any other contributor for that matter, I have failed the nomination. In the future, please only nominate articles at GAC if you plan on working on them during the process. Otherwise it's a complete waste of time for potential reviewers. Thank you. María (habla conmigo) 12:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Harvey Korman edit

In this edit you fouled the infobox by changing the parameter names. Why; were you using an auto-editor or something? In any case, I hope you can discover why it happened so it may be avoided in the future. Cheers, DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Judith Ann Hawkins

In view of you repeadedly removing the acknowledgement Halle Berry's mother is from Liverpool born I am contacting you, why do you not recognise this ? Dmcm2008 (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

To show I am fair, I have had a look at your first citation there is a pic of Halle Berry can you tell me where the article or video is to show what you say? And I was aware of the Geiniology page but this isn't a perfect world it is can be 'presumed' that her mother was born in Ohio as there would be no evidence to disprove. Why do you think I have added citations of two top British newspapers both say her mother is from Liverpool and furthermore why would they say she is from Liverpool if it were not true? & why say her mother left over 40 years ago (at the time) which would indicate she left in her early twenties and then met Mr Berry and had children?. Dmcm2008 (talk) 10:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

re: above. I am five minutes into research this site http://www.dipity.com/timeline/Halle_Berry/json claims Judith Ann Hawkins is Liverpool born however mother born in Derbyshire, England while Berry's maternal grand father Earl Hawkins was an American born in Ohio. This is the second one I have found to say this. I am not leaving this text to prove or disprove I am adding info to what we have been discussing and disagreeing over. Perhaps there is some more information out there Dmcm2008 (talk) 21:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)