User talk:Ultraviolet scissor flame

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Ultraviolet scissor flame's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Ultraviolet scissor flame.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5


Contents

[edit] Congrats!

Well done on getting Portal:James Bond featured! I'm glad I could help with random content! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pokemon Center

Please look at the talk page for Pokemon Center you will find some most interesting material there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurowoofwoof111 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mr. Monk Goes to the Bank

So you deleted the Mr. Monk Goes to the Bank page and redirected to the List of Monk episodes. Your right, I suppose. But as a result, the list of episodes now contains a self-referencing link. Should you not clean that up? Ronstew (talk) 04:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BondAndJaws.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BondAndJaws.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Windows 2000 article

Keeping the balance/number of images same, I think it is important to include 2 images, the logo and the Windows Explorer screenshot. 2 other images in the System utilities section can be removed, especially the Registry Editor and Disk Defragmenter/Recovery Console. - xpclient Talk 20:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request to move article Casino Royale (novel) incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Casino Royale (novel) to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

  1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
  2. Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
  3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paeerduag

Out of interest have you changed accounts from Paeerduag. He hasnt been around for ages and i heard that its you. If its not you, do you know a way i can get hold of him. Cheers. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 16:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, you dont have his email by any chance? --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 16:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] regarding a redirect

Regarding the above redirect, if you would like it to be changed to a redirect, please discuss it on the article's talk page.--Rockfang (talk) 22:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk page reverts

I just want to let you know that you reverted my edits to my own talk page. — Wenli (reply here) 06:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Archbishopric of Strasbourg/Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Strasbourg

If you had bothered to read the talk page, you would know that I am doing a split. Please check the talk page, before assuming vandalism. Would save us all much hassle. Benkenobi18 (talk) 07:59, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, but always explain in your edit summary. Ultra! 11:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re Paul McCartney; warning re editing

Following a request by User:Andreasegde I have reviewed your contributions to the above article. While the edits can be classified as helpful, I consider that they do not improve the article so much as to negate the disruption that you are evidently causing to the other editors to the article - and I am concerned that you are editing in such a manner to make a WP:POINT. I would ask you to not edit the article further without reaching consensus first on the talkpage; the article was previously stable and had consensus, and you therefore need to change that consensus to alter the article. Please regard this as an official warning, and note that disregarding this notice may result in you being blocked. I notice that you have also been provided with Rollbacker rights. I would further warn you that should you use rollback to revert any edit to the McCartney article that isn't obvious vandalism, and any edit whatsoever by Andreasegde (who is a good faith editor), I shall block you immediately and refer the matter to WP:AN for review of my actions, your editing record, and your Rollbacker rights.

Lastly, my attention has been drawn to this matter which I was previously involved in - and I remember your reluctance to abide by the spirit of the WP ethos. I strongly suggest that you consider your attitude toward consensus and working with your fellow wikipedians, and adjust your editing practices accordingly. LessHeard vanU (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] xpclient

Lol whatever does "Are you an XP client" mean? I just "took the word" from the RTM About box (Winver.exe) in Windows XP :D - xpclient Talk 18:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar! That was very kind of you. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 22:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Madonna

I have replied, sorry for the delay, my internet connection went down. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 16:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, do you still have time to finish off the madonna article? We are extending the time period to give you extra time. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 20:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

My keyboard has problems. Ultra! 20:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Replied at my page ;-) --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 20:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Read the comments at the bottom of the reassessment, it will really help you with those citations.

If you can find a source that resolves multiple requests you can just add the one source and remove all the tags within that sentance. Im sure you know that already though. If you think other tags are unnessary you can remove them but leave a GOOD reasoning in the edit summary. Im monitering it, if your reasoning is good it'll be accepted. If your unsure that something honestly needs a source come speak to me or query it at the reassessment. Cheers. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 21:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

We are using some of the same sources quite frequently, we should do some of that "ref name" formatting to these sources so that we dont have to write the full source out over and over, it will cut down the bytes of the article too. What you think? Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 16:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not staying long

I am still leaving. It's nothing to do with you. You followed my request to not reinstate deleted comments on my talk page, thanks for that. Not too long ago I requested to usurp a never used Username. So I cancelled the goodbye message until it is implemented. Once that is done, I will then restore the message and will leave Wikipedia forever. Why am I going? I've had enough of it all. A small group of almost professional users, one in particular, are dictating how things are to be. I used to find editing to be a pleasure, but not anymore. Its became a drudge. Anyway, I hope you find things are much better for you. Happy editing. Cwb61 (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Help to preserve Serfdom in Tibet

Help to preserve Serfdom in Tibet .

They have edited out almost everything, there were 2 comments from Charles Bell about slavery, Amban, and Cumulus Clouds edited out the one mentioning children being sold as slaves, however left the one says slavery was mild.

[edit] Double check reporting

Please double check your reports when you bring vandals to AIV. This one hadn't edited since a day ago when a block was issued. Remember to only report active vandals. Thanks, Metros (talk) 15:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Wiki stalking

Hello, I have alerted another admin about this, but he has yet to respond and the vandal is getting out of control. I am going to repost what I put on the admin's talk page.

Some anon keeps deleting my comments on the talk page of the International Reaction article, check out the history for proof. Also this same person keeps demanding me to answer him on my talkpage. I have no idea what he wants me to answer about. Ohh and while I was making this edit, the anon deleted all of my talk page. Thanks. --Tocino 18:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Ohh, he just did it again. He replaces my talk page with the following: 'YOU DON'T BELONG HERE! GO! FOREVER AND EVER! ONCE AND FOR ALL! --Tocino 18:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Tocino 18:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey, unfortunately the same vandal is back. He vandalized my talk page again (see diff here: [1] ) . If you take a look at his contributions every single edit of his is vandalism. Thanks for dealing with this. --Tocino 17:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Service Badge ?

Is there anyway if I can figure out if I achieved any service awards from the past. I know that I am a Journeyman Editor but I want to know if I reached the other service awards. How can I figure out. Your help is appreciated. Thanks    Juthani1   tcs 22:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks    Juthani1   tcs 22:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pierce Brosnan

Did you mean to remove IMDb from the Brosnan article? IP4240207xx (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Acts of Union 1707

Why did you revert my edit? The section falls under the category of original research! Please re-revert!!!! 213.131.125.34 (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

All the sources are present there. see those links carefully Ultra! 11:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
"Synthesizing material occurs when an editor tries to demonstrate the validity of his or her own conclusions by citing sources that when put together serve to advance the editor's position. If the sources cited do not explicitly reach the same conclusion, or if the sources cited are not directly related to the subject of the article, then the editor is engaged in original research" (Wikipedia: No Original Research) - there is no source given that explicitly says the conclusion that "there were many concerns that England was trying to use the Union to dominate Scotland". The examples used CANNOT be used to promote a further conclusion. A Wikipedian CANNOT make that inference themselves. It MUST be sourced. Yeesh! 213.131.125.34 (talk) 11:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
No this isnt synthesis. Every sentence comes from one source each. Some have been modified and not lifted word to word to avoid copyvio. Ultra! 11:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
You don't seem to be getting it. I am adding an OR label because those sources are being synthesised to support a further conclusion that "there were many concerns that England was trying to use the Union to dominate Scotland", and this is Original Research. Oh well, an admin is coming to look at it, so you can deal with them. 213.131.125.34 (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Original Characters in Hollyoaks

Hi. Even the name of this article/redirect is awful I think. Do you like it? Friendly, Magioladitis (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Odd edit summary

Your edit summary says that you are reverting old vandalism, yet you appear to just be adding new material, have I missed something? Feel free to reply here or at my talk page... in full sentances obviously. --— Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 04:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

No its not new. Check the diffs. Ultra! 04:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
It no problem, im just trying to keep track of whats happening. Im not sure if the article will be delisted now, if progress continues I will remove my vote. --— Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 04:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop saying "DONE" until you have actually completed the request fully. The reassessment is already really long. Please complete the issue before stricking as done. --— Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 20:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Madonna

I didn't say that the word "rock and roll" applies to "any music, I said that any popular, mainstream music (such as Madonna) is often incorrectly referred to as "rock and roll", even though it isn't actually rock music. I'd be willing to reinstate the category provided that you can show me a citation where someone identifies one of her songs as being "rock". Her music is pop, dance and electronica, and I have never heard anything by her to indicate otherwise. Asarelah (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Using "number" instead of "#' increases readability and reduces clutter. Its up to you; anyway, it's not a policy. --Efe (talk) 05:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AMG

is a reliable website and pretty mcuh the first place anybody goes to while working on a music article. Honestly, I have never heard anybody bring up reliability issues with AG. The info for the singles listed there are taken directly from the Billboard website, there's a tag at the bottom "Chart information courtesy of Billboard.com © 2006 VNU eMedia, Inc. All rights reserved". As for user submissions, maybe they have a blog or something along with the site (many sites have that even Rolling Stone), but reviews and chart info are not user contributed. The advantage of the using the Allmusic page is that its a one-stop place for the chart positions, and its much easier to just cite that one website. Further, the article size becomes significantly smaller. Also, we avoid the ugly citation after every comma, enhancing readability.. indopug (talk) 14:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Madonna

Madonna's politics deserve it's own section. She has been politically active for three decades now. You shouldn't just hide it in the text. We had the section for a reason. Also, I fixed information like "Up For Grabs" being done in 2002, not 2004, and you removed the mention of the "Sticky and Sweet" tour. You're adding all her political references from the past couple of years, in the 2005-06 bit. It's a mess. Please keep it in its own section like it was before. We also have to add her "Get Out The Vote" ads, her Bill Clinton sketch, and comments, etc. It's been ongoing. In the future, could you please check before you go calling everything vandalism? I did not "vandalize". Maddyfan (talk) 07:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Acts of Union 1707

Are you sure that the quote and the source that you put together in your recent edit here go together?? Have you checked that they go together or just put them together anyway?? 213.131.125.34 (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm still waiting for a response from you about this. 88.107.8.175 (talk) 21:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I suppose you got a reply on Admin noticeboard. Ultra! 15:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

About the source you're pointing out, it could move to references section. Ultra! 15:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Could you help me get an image deleted?

This image of Janet Jackson is copyrighted. It's straight from Gettyimages. How do I tag it for deletion?

[2]

link

This source you showed doesnt open. Any other one? Ultra! 07:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 007 Collaboration

What kind is it? If its the FT, I'd probably take a look at all the extras of some films to help the articles. igordebraga ≠ 04:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Check the Wikiproject's page. Ultra! 07:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "Merges"

Is there a reason you "merged" every single Pokémon navbox into the single Template:Pokemon media, creating a massive box, and parts of which are not part of the media related to the franchise which can be much easily covered by the separate templates?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

It has been discussed at the project's talk. Here, an anon removed many things from the template.[3] Ultra! 15:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yet another editor bugging you about recent edits.

Hola. I am inclined to undo the redirection of Hero (Quest for Glory) to Quest for Glory, which is somewhat unorthodox so I'm bringing it up with you first in the spirit of universal peace and brotherhood.

The article's plot content is minimal. The Hero is the traditional kind of silent first-person protagonist and generally doesn't even have a name. Instead, the article has vital coverage of the game mechanics of the series; these revolve around the hero. The coverage looks like it can use some tightening, as most things do, but it is descriptive rather than instructive and important to have (i) as a basic element of our coverage of the series, (ii) because Quest for Glory was a very high-profile series and remains one of the most prominent adventure game series, and (iii) because the series was either a unique hybrid or the best-known member of a very small group.

Iff it's all the same to you, answering on this page would be preferable. If you so prefer, then feel free to just smile, nod, and go on your merry way instead. --Kizor 22:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Moonraker-Attack-of-US-astronauts.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Moonraker-Attack-of-US-astronauts.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Madonna (entertainer)/1

Hi, this discussion, which you were involved in, has been restarted. Please take another look and try and get this wrapped up sooner rather than later. :-) Cheers, giggy (:O) 12:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Alien & Predator video games

Hi. I really appreciate the work you're doing merging the prop & character articles into Aliens (film). However, I'm going to have to ask you to stop unilaterally removing merge tags from the video game articles. If you disagree that a particular article should be merged, start a discussion on the article's talk page or join in the discussion at Talk:List of Alien and Predator games. The tags shouldn't be removed until the merge is completed or a consensus is reached not to merge. And we can only come to such a consensus through discussion. You removed tags from several articles under the claim that they were notable or that notability was shown. But Wikipedia establishes notability through third-party sources, and none of those articles have any. Just because a game has received an update or has mods doesn't automatically make it notable. Wikiproject Video Games has some good advice on how to establish notability and provide good article content. Out of the 7 articles you removed merge tags from, 6 consist of little more than an infobox, plot summary, and copyrighted screenshots. Most are obvious stubs. Merger into a list article is a perfectly reasonable suggestion in these cases and if you disagree you are welcome to join or start a discussion. But you shouldn't just remove the tags outright, and I find it a bit hypocritical that you would do so when you are in the process of merging the Aliens-related articles that suffer from pretty much the same problems as these video game articles. --IllaZilla (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)