User talk:UkPaolo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

Archive 1 (46 topics) May 2005 – February 2006 Archive 2 (38 topics) February 2006 – April 2006 Archive 3 (42 topics) April 2006 – May 2006 Archive 4 (46 topics) May 2006 – November 2006 Archive 5 (37 topics) November 2006 – April 2007

Contents 1 Paul Torrisi.jpg 2 Southampton 3 Thanks 4 The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007 5 Adoption 6 Boldrewood 7 The Apprentice (UK)--re-nominate for featured article status? 8 Apprentice Screenshots 9 Kempshott, Basingstoke Hampshire 10 The Apprentice (UK) Peer Review 11 re: 24dash.com 12 Happy first edit day 13 The Editor's Barnstar 14 Kate Moss article protection 15 Italian? 16 Help! 17 Semi-Protection of the "Candidates" article 18 Syed Ahmed ............... Again! 19 Semi protection for Sharon Osbourne 20 Removal of Basingstoke Business Directory link 21 Non-free use disputed for Image:Ernie mark 1 console.jpg 22 Christine Young 23 WikiProject Student Affairs 24 WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5 25 Orphaned non-free media (Image:University of Southampton.jpg) 26 Fair use rationale for Image:LondonCentral.png 27 Image:LondonGeneral.png 28 On Clipmate deletion 29 ClipMate continued. 30 ClipMate continued. 31 Fair use rationale for Image:Qmc logo.gif 32 Replaceable fair use Image:FestivalPlace-tower.jpg 33 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:University of Portsmouth.jpg 34 Fair use rationale for Image:WhereTheBloodyHellAreYou.jpg 35 Mike McCracken 36 Happy First Edit Day! 37 Happy first Edit Day fellow Wikipedian! 38 Fair use rationale for Image:Acciona.png

[edit] Paul Torrisi.jpg

Why are there other images around wikipedia that are fine and are screenshots of TV programmes. Yet I took this screen shot on Media Centre and yet I am being accused of copyright violation. I don't think I am being fairly treated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olz06 (talk • contribs)

Firstly, let me clarify things. I don't believe anybody has accused you of copyright violation - I certainly haven't. You uploaded an image as fair use, and I have said that since it could be replaced, it doesn't meet the terms of our policy, and should be deleted.

Secondly, there is nothing wrong with screenshots of television programmes per se. To illustrate an article on EastEnders, for example, it would be perfectly reasonable to include a screenshot of some of the cast. The point there is that that usage does not violate the terms of our criteria - that image could not be replaced by a free equivalent, since they are fictional characters, being portrayed on a set to which there is restricted access. The same could be said of a screenshot of a particular televised event, which has happened in the past, if it was being used to illustrate an article on the event in question. Because it is being listed as fair use it all comes down to usage... the same image could be perfectly justifiably used in some ways, and not in others. To be used to illustrate an article about Paul Torrisi we really need an image licensed under a free content license. That basically means that someone who has taken a photo of him (and thus owns the copyright to that photo) chooses to make such an image available under a free use license. If this is not possible, we could potentially use a copyrighted image (such as an image from a press pack, like this, or a screen shot of a television show like you've just uploaded) under a fair use rationale. However, to justify fair use, an image must meet our policy at Wikipedia:Fair use criteria. The problem with this image is that it fails the first criterion: a free equivalent could be created that would adequately give the same information (as I said above, that's not to say that creating an equivalent would be easy...). The same problem would be true of any other copyrighted image which you upload under a fair use rationale. To give a further illustration of the idea of "fair use", we could probably justify fair use of your screenshot to illustrate an article on Paul Torrisi's Breakfast Interview (if that was an important event, worthy of a Wikipedia article), but not to illustrate an article of the subject concerned. Similarly, we could justify using a copy of a magazine's front cover featuring Tony Blair to illustrate an article about "Blair in the media", but not to illustrate Blair himself (since a free alternative could be obtained...)

There may very well be similar images being used elsewhere on Wikipedia. There's currently quite a back log of such images which have been identified to be deleted (just look in all the subcategories of Category:Replaceable fair use images!) Unfortunately, the fact that there may be other images used incorrectly doesn't change my opinion of this image. If you come across any such images, I'd invite you to tag them for deletion, in accordance with our Fair Use policy.

I can assure you that my tagging of this image is in no way personal, and that you are being treated fairly an in accordance with our policies. If you dispute the policy itself, I'd advise discussing it at the talk page of our Fair Use policy, or asking questions at Media copyright questions page. I hope this clarifies things. Regards _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 20:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Southampton

I don't think so that Polish community website is irrevelant for Southampton Wikimedia. We add that links do Culture and we promote that there becouse in Soton is abouth 30 thousent Polish people and we promote they culture ... Kind regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.239.52 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the help. I thought i'd broken wikipedia! Dalejenkins 18:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007

The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. BetacommandBot 20:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption

Seeing as your an administrator i'd thought i'd ask why, do you think, my user name is not on the list: Category:Wikipedians seeking to adopt in Adopt-a-user. I put the box on my user and talk page but it will not, for some reason appear on the list.... Please help!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by olz06 (talk • contribs)

Hi - it appears you are correctly listed on Category:Wikipedians seeking to adopt in Adopt-a-user... perhaps you were viewing a cached page? _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 12:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Boldrewood

UkPaolo,

Why did you delete my edit to the Boldrewood page?

The Tunnel soc (with whom I am in no way affiliated) does exist, and campaign for the reopening of the tunnel. The University does not either confirm or deny the existence of the tunnel... (I personally don't believe there would be a foot tunnel between the campuses, but that is not relevant to a Wikipedia discussion) NC602 15:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. The reason I removed your addition to the Boldrewood article is that this is an encyclopedia, and as such content should be both notable and verifiable. I don't really consider mention of the tunnel to be either. I accept that there is a university society who claim there is a tunnel, but I don't consider that fact to be particularly noteworthy in a global encyclopedia. A previous article about that society was deleted by consensus, as not being important. You also failed to reference any reliable external source to back up the addition. If, for example, The Times ran an article on the society, or BBC South Today ran a story about it, I'd consider my views differently, but as it stands, I don't consider it worthy of inclusion. I do hope this won't put you off staying around and editing further. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 17:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Apprentice (UK)--re-nominate for featured article status?

After Bravedog's initial nomination, all/most of the needs specified have been completed. Do you think its worth re-nominating The Apprentice (UK) for FA or GA status? Dalejenkins 17:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Dale, since the previous FA nomination I do think the article has improved enormously, and that is a credit to yourself and other editors who have contributed. I do think work still needs to be carried out to ensure that all references follow the correct format (the easiest way to ensure consistency is to use the templates such as {{cite web}}). I did begin this, but there is a lot further to go.

After that, I'd suggest listing the article at Wikipedia:Peer review in order to generate further discussion about any more work which should be carried out prior to re-nomination for FA (or GA, which would probably be a sensible stepping-stone to aim for on the way to gaining FA status).

_└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 17:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Apprentice Screenshots

Hi there, seeing as you're an administrator I thought I'd ask you this question I have. On the page List of The Apprentice UK candidates, someone has added small screenshots of some of the series 3 candidates - are these images fair use? It would be nice to include them for all candidates for all series, but I'm hesitant to add them as I'm not too familiar with what would and wouldn't be fair use. Thanks! Seaserpent85 12:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I have recently discovered that it's against Wikipedia policy to have more than x many screenshots on one article. That's why the Big Brother articles have removed all of the housemate pictures. Dalejenkins 18:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kempshott, Basingstoke Hampshire

You have removed the link I placed on the Kempshott page. This link was to the largest community site that covers Kempshott, with support and details of almost all the community groups in Kempshott. You say that you Wikipedia is not for links to commercial websites, does that mean any websites that has paid adverts, even if their aim is to provide community information. The Kempshott page has links on it, 2 go to the same site which also has adverts on it. There are also many sites in Southampton, Portsmouth, Winchester and Andover which have links many of which are not relevent or mentioned on the page or have adverts on them. I can understand the policy but it doesnt seem consistant currently. Phill 83.217.164.158 21:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Apprentice (UK) Peer Review

I've nominated it for peer review, now we'll have to just wait and see. Dalejenkins 18:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: 24dash.com

Hey there, after looking at the article and web site some more, you are definitely correct. I restored the article. I would rather an external source backing up its claim, but it should be a useful stub for the time being. Thanks for discussing it with me! --Spike Wilbury 16:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 16:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Happy first edit day

Happy First Edit Day, UkPaolo, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Politics rule 23:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing UkPaolo a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

GrooveDog 01:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Editor's Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Awarded due to your outstanding edits on The Apprentice (UK). GA/FA status, here we come! Dalejenkins 18:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kate Moss article protection

The article of Kate Moss is being subjected to constant vandalism and I was wondering whether it would be worth partly protecting the page? It would be great if you could look into this being an administrator. Many thanks. Eagle Owl 18:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

fair point, I've semi protected the page for the time being, which should hopefully stop it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 19:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the semi protection on the article. Lets hope it will deter those vandals. Regards. Eagle Owl 13:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Italian?

Are you italian? (217.42.46.119 20:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Help!

There is a new editor taking an interest in the Jennifer Saunders article where lots of edits are below Wikipedia standards. The editor is constantly updating the article and some of it is absolute drivel and unsourced, whilst some is fairly good. The worrying thing is that it is going live on the internet and I'm struggling to keep up correcting and changing the article. I have left a message on the editor's talk page but what else can be done? Eagle Owl 14:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-Protection of the "Candidates" article

As an admin, can you help here? Thanks. Dalejenkins 19:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Syed Ahmed ............... Again!

I Mean hes been really sucessful why not??? Bobo6balde66 20:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I think I made my reasoning pretty clear here. He may have been successful, but I personally don't believe he is sufficiently notable to merit an article here. Since previous deletion discussions have agreed with this, if you wish to discuss this matter further, I suggest posting to Wikipedia:Deletion review. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 22:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Semi protection for Sharon Osbourne

Hi, I'm here for help again. The article Sharon Osbourne is coming under really heavy vandalism by one of more vandals. Could you please consider this article for semi protection. Many thanks again. Eagle Owl 18:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of Basingstoke Business Directory link

Dear UKPaulo,

Can you please explain why you removed the link to the basingstoke business directory that I added?

On the history notes, you say it was because the site is a commercial link. But after reading the external links guide, I can find no definitive rule within the WP:EL which specifically excludes commercial entries (the guidelines only say that commercial entries should be "avoided").

I think this particular site has relevant information which is not available in any of the other external links. This Business Directory is the largest of it's type that I've found to date and it also includes a local events calendar, a map of the arterial roads around Basingstoke and a handful of articles about Basingstoke. I think most people would therefore agree that this would make the external link relevant to the basingstoke wiki article.

80.0.82.71 10:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Frank Tanner

Frank, I'll confess to being somewhat confused by your message since I'm unsure exactly which edit you're talking about. From looking over the Basingstoke article history I can only assume you are referring to this, in which case your grievance is with User:Mighty Antar and not with myself. I would, however support his decision. basingbusiness.com appears to be a directory containing largely commercial links. The fact that it might be "the largest of it's type" as you say (and I would possibly dispute that, but it's by the by), is no reason for it to be included. Per Wikipedia:External links links should be kept to a minimum, and to my mind this doesn't appear to be a particularly useful one to add. I don't feel it really adds value, and doesn't directly relate to the article's subject (it doesn't really inform the reader about Basingstoke, more of businesses based in it). It's more of use to people living there, than people reading an encyclopedia entry about the place. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 21:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Ernie mark 1 console.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ernie mark 1 console.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Konstable 10:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christine Young

Someone is trying to delete Christine Young again. I know you voted to keep the article the first time. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Young (2nd nomination) Jmm6f488 05:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Student Affairs

Hi! I noticed you have contributed greatly to some education-related articles and I was wondering if you'd like to join a WikiProject for Student Affairs that I'm trying to start. I tried this a few months ago but there was no interest, so now I'm trying to contact people directly that may have an interest. Let me know if you'd want to join such a WP so I can submit a request. Thanks! --Noetic Sage 23:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5

The Biography WikiProject Newsletter Volume IV, no. 4 - September 2007
Project News The three-month long Summer Assessment Drive, organized by Psychless, was a huge success! It ran from June 1 – September 1, and reduced the backlog of unassessed articles from 113,385 to 56,237. In all, over 100,000 articles were assessed. Over 60 people contributed in some way. A barnstar has been created for exceptional work on Wikipedia biographies and for assisting the project. The Biography Barnstar is listed with the other WikiProject awards and can be awarded easily with a template. See the template page for more details. Member News Congratulations to the editors who worked on the newest featured biographies: Augustus; William Shakespeare; Adriaen van der Donck; Alfred Russel Wallace; Alison Krauss; Anne Frank; Anne of Denmark; Asser; Bart King; Bill O'Reilly; Bobby Robson; Bradley Joseph; CM Punk; Ceawlin of Wessex; Colley Cibber; Cædwalla of Wessex; Dominik Hašek; Elizabeth Needham; Frank Macfarlane Burnet; Georg Cantor; Gregory of Nazianzus; Gunnhild Mother of Kings; Gwen Stefani; Hannah Primrose, Countess of Rosebery; Harriet Arbuthnot; Harry S. Truman; Henry, Bishop of Uppsala; Héctor Lavoe; Ine of Wessex; Ion Heliade Rădulescu; Jack Sheppard; Jackie Chan; Jay Chou; John Martin Scripps; John Mayer; Joseph Francis Shea; Joshua A. Norton; Kate Bush; Kazi Nazrul Islam; Kevin Pietersen; Martin Brodeur; Mary Martha Sherwood; Mary of Teck; Maximus the Confessor; Miranda Otto; Muhammad Ali Jinnah; P. K. van der Byl; Penda of Mercia; Pham Ngoc Thao; Rabindranath Tagore; Ramón Emeterio Betances; Red Barn Murder; Richard Hakluyt; Richard Hawes; Robert Garran; Roman Vishniac; Ronald Niel Stuart; Ronald Reagan; Roy Welensky; Rudolph Cartier; Samuel Adams; Samuel Beckett; Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough; Sarah Trimmer; Sargon of Akkad; Shen Kuo; Sophie Blanchard; Stereolab; Sydney Newman; Sylvanus Morley; Tim Duncan; Timeline of Mary Wollstonecraft; Uncle Tupelo; Waisale Serevi; Wallis, Duchess of Windsor; Walter Model; William Bruce; William Goebel; Yagan; Zhou Tong; Æthelbald of Mercia; Æthelbald of Mercia New Members Congratulations to our 225 new members	From the Editors The newsletter is back! Many things have gone on during the past few months, but many things have not. While the assessment drive helped revitalize the assessment department of the project, many other departments have received no attention. Most notably: peer review and our "workgroups". A day long IRC meeting has been planned for October 13th, with the major focus being which areas of the project are "dead", what should our goals be as a project, and how to "revive" the dead areas of our project. Contribute to the discussion on the the new channel (see below) We decided to deliver this newsletter to all project members this month but only those with their names down here will get it delivered in the future. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned or post news on the next issue's talk page New irc channel Lastly, a new WikiProject Biography channel has been set up on the freenode network: #wikipedia-en-bio Our thanks to Phoenix 15 for setting it up. Contributors to this Issue Psychless (talk · contribs) Phoenix 15 (talk · contribs)
Complete To Do List Write Expand stubs: British • American • Japanese • Indian • Pakistan • Australian • French • Canadian • Chinese • Polish • Russian • Turkish • People by nationality... Auto racing biography • Basketball biography • English football biography • Ice hockey biography • Track and field athletics • Sportspeople... British nobility • Military personnel • Canadian politicians • Australian politicians • British politicians • More politicians... Academics • Actors • Artists • Business biography • Mathematicians • Musicians • Television biography • Writers Collaborate: Ali Create: Articles requested for more than a year - Biographies requested Add infoboxes Review Peer Review: Major James Morris • Insane Clown Posse • Jane Elizabeth Hodgson • Paul Koehler • Charlemagne Tower • John Zorn • James C. Duff • Skip Holtz • Dredg • G. Edward Griffin • Tenacious D • Jordanus de Nemore • Johan Arnold Smellekamp • Eros Ramazzotti A-class Review: Gregory R. Ball • Milla Jovovich • Gordon Bell (American football) • Jack Clancy • Elmer Gedeon • Dick Rifenburg Assess: Assessment requests • Assess an article Assessment Progress Biography articles Importance Top None Total Quality FA 21 480 501 A 2 19 21 GA 24 966 990 B 151 14396 14547 Start 2 110533 110535 Stub 336778 336778 List 111 111 Assessed 200 463283 463483 Unassessed 56189 56189 Total 200 519472 519672
We couldn't do it without you!

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 16:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:University of Southampton.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:University of Southampton.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:LondonCentral.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LondonCentral.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 23:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:LondonGeneral.png

I have tagged Image:LondonGeneral.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. PxMa 23:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On Clipmate deletion

Hi!

Why did you delete the article on Clipmate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Erm, that was a while back! I deleted ClipMate under Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion A7: namely that there was no indication of importance/significance - basically, it didn't read like the application was significantly notable to merit an article on Wikipedia, since the article failed to give any indication to the contrary. If you'd like to discuss the matter further, I suggest you post to Wikipedia:Deletion review. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 19:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ClipMate continued.

Have a look at this! ClipMate wins "Best Application" at the 2007 Shareware Industry Awards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ClipMate continued.

Have a look at this! ClipMate wins "Best Application" at the 2007 Shareware Industry Awards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Well firstly, I don't believe that statement was in the article. Secondly, whilst I'd agree that is an assertion of notability, I still have concerns that it makes the software sufficiently notable to merit an article on an encyclopedia. However, I'd urge you, as I said previously, to start a discussion on this matter at Wikipedia:Deletion review. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 22:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

You are right. It was not in the article. I just wanted to see if you are biased or what... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.16.122.218 (talk) 22:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Qmc logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Qmc logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla 00:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:FestivalPlace-tower.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FestivalPlace-tower.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:University of Portsmouth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:University of Portsmouth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WhereTheBloodyHellAreYou.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WhereTheBloodyHellAreYou.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mike McCracken

I do not understand why you requested my first aritcle for deletion under the reason that it was advertising? I am new to the site and only had tried to start the page. I am so far a slow editor learning the ropes, please allow time for me to gather information and references for what will be an informative and important article to contribute to the Wikipedia community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nra4ever5585 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Happy First Edit Day!

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing UkPaolo a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Meldshal42_{Hit me}^{What I've Done} 19:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing UkPaolo a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Idontknow610^TM 20:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Happy first Edit Day fellow Wikipedian!

Happy First Edit Day, UkPaolo, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Best wishes from Canada!  ;-) --RobNS 02:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Acciona.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Acciona.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)