Talk:Top Cow Productions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related work groups (nations and regions): United States comics work group

Contents 1 Fair use rationale for Image:The Darkness 07 (Art by Marc Silvestri).jpg 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Cs02topcow.jpeg 3 Fair use rationale for Image:Freshmen.jpg 4 Pilot Season merge

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Darkness 07 (Art by Marc Silvestri).jpg

Image:The Darkness 07 (Art by Marc Silvestri).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cs02topcow.jpeg

Image:Cs02topcow.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Freshmen.jpg

Image:Freshmen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pilot Season merge

• Keep There has been a lot of attention on this "banner" title and it will make a solid standalone article. (Emperor (talk) 15:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC))
• I'm against the merge, as the "Pilot Season" thing has enough info and distinctiveness that it would just be clutter in this article. Ford MF (talk) 16:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
• Merge. (I originally proposed it.) I'm not sure that "Pilot Season" is notable enough on its own, but it would clearly work in the main article, though it could likely be trimmed down a bit. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
  • The problem is we have only just got started (it has only been a handful of hours since it was started, after all) - there is the reception (reviews, sales figures and the large number of votes) as well as the fact that the latest round doesn't include existing titles. It is also worth noting that Pilot Season is effectively a banner title under which the one-shots appear, so we can partly consider them as mini-series - this is underlined by the fact that the first round are being collected into a trade paperback volume. So rather than trimming it down it actually need expanding. (Emperor (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC))
  • Fair enough. Let's see how things progress, and we'll revisit the merging issue, if necessary. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)