User talk:Sue Wallace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Non-free image 2 Image deletion 3 Commercial use of Image:BOBBYBLUEBLAND.jpg 4 Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chuckberry.jpg) 5 Image deletion 6 Orphaned non-free image (Image:Humblepierockin'thefillmore.jpg) 7 Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stevemarriottmemorial.jpg) 8 Orphaned non-free image (Image:Itchycoopark.jpg) 9 Copyright issue with The Moments 10 Wikipedia Music Project guidelines 11 re: your question on my talk page 12 Lal Masjid 13 Orphaned non-free image (Image:Itchycoopark2.jpg) 14 Orphaned non-free image (Image:HUMBLEPIE4.jpg) 15 Talk:Rolling Stones 16 Hi 17 Fair use disputed for Image:Silence is Golden The Tremeloes.gif 18 Fair use rationale for Image:HumbleBigBlackDogsml.jpg 19 Hot 'n' Nasty (Humble Pie song) 20 Fair use rationale for Image:The Krays Film 1990.jpg 21 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Twiggy60's.jpg 22 Wikipedia talk:Use of flags in articles 23 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Humblepiealbumcover.jpg 24 Typo on Jean Charles de Menezes 25 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Twiggy60's.jpg) 26 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Herecomesthenice.jpg) 27 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ogdensnutgoneflake1.jpg) 28 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lazysundayafternoon.jpg) 29 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Humblepierockon.jpg) 30 Fair use rationale for Image:Dateline Diamonds UK 1965 film.jpg 31 2007 Burmese anti-government protests 32 User:131.94.172.86 33 Vandalism at Oe disambiguation page 34 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Andrew loog oldham.jpg 35 License tagging for Image:R&B from the Marquee (album) 1962.jpg 36 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lionel Bart.jpg 37 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LOVEAFFAIR1960S.jpg 38 New word 39 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LOVEAFFAIR1960S.jpg 40 Amy Winehouse 41 Fair use rationale for Image:Oliver222.jpg 42 Fair use rationale for Image:OLIVER111.jpeg 43 Your edit to St Mary-le-Bow 44 Harrods memorial 45 Re:Amy Winehouse 46 Possibly unfree Image:Isla_Fisher_(actress).jpg 47 Possibly unfree Image:Myleene_Klass_(Hyde_Park,_2007).jpg 48 Pictures from Flickr 49 Orphaned non-free media (Image:House of Fraser logo.jpg) 50 December 2007 51 Wikipedia:WikiProject Anglicanism 52 Would you take a look? 53 Welcome! 54 Bradford Canal 55 Greenwich Millennium Village 56 RfA thanks 57 London Meetup - January 12, 2008 58 Copyvio 59 fairy tale 60 Photos from Flickr 61 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Humblelogo.gif) 62 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ray movie.jpg 63 Quick request 64 :Image:Leigh on Sea shoreline.jpg 65 Possibly unfree Image:Worthing Pier, Sussex.jpg 66 Amy Winehouse 67 Harrods 68 Good call! 69 London Meetup - April 13th 70 WikiProject Christianity Newsletter 71 Orphaned non-free media (Image:British Invasion Vol 2.jpg) 72 Humanitarian League 73 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rolling Stones debut album.jpg) 74 Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Shadows group.jpg) 75 London Meetups - Sunday May 11th 76 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rolllingstones greengrass.jpg) 77 Image:The_London_Eye_at_dusk.jpg listed for deletion 78 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Its All About (album) Spooky Tooth.jpg) 79 WikiProject Christianity Newsletter 80 Speedy deletion of Image:Alresford Creek sunset.gif 81 WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

[edit] Non-free image

I listed the following image as fair use disputed Image:Rod-stewart 60825.jpg. Considering the many messages you got about replaceable non-free content you should know that this image will never pass the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Please read those before uploading any more non-free content. Garion96 (talk) 10:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Well..the picture for the infobox in Madonna is Image:Madon1.JPG a free content image. Basically fair use/non-free content is only allowed when no free equivalent is available or could be created. With Rod Stewart a free content picture is definitely possible. Nevertheless a whole lot of articles still have non-free images which fail the non-free content criteria but slowly they will and are being removed. They usually are older uploaded files though, the Rod Stewart image was only uploaded a couple of days ago. Garion96 (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

There is a discussion somewhere about album covers, probably on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Right now (although as I said, this is under discussion) it probably fulfills the criteria in the article Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music, but not in the Ray Charles article. Plus it's not really comparable. A free image of that album is not available and will not be available until the copyright expires. A free image of Rod Stewart on the other hand is possible. Garion96 (talk) 23:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

No, it depends that Wikipedia in general has been extremely lax in enforcing the non-free content criteria. It's just too easy to google for an image, upload it and add it to the article instead of searching for a free content image, asking permission to release it under a free license etc. I am pretty sure that one day someone (doesn't matter if it will be an admin or not) will cleanup the Aerosmith article. Garion96 (talk) 00:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the image you found of Rod Stewart. Image:RODSTEWARTFLICKR.jpg Yes, flickr is great resource for free content images. This image however is tagged on flickr with all rights reserved and is not released under a CC license. Garion96 (talk) 00:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Boy, that Madonna article has definately excessive fair use images and songs. If I feel like it I will clean it up one time. Regarding flickr. Yes, that's very annoying with flickr. With public they mean that everyone can view the image, not that it is released in the public domain. You also can hide your pictures and only invite users to watch your images. See [1] for an image released under a license wikipedia can use. (For flickr images that is only cc-by and cc-by-sa). Garion96 (talk) 00:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

There is no blanket ban on album covers, which won't happen anyway. Although it might be more stricter, only have an album cover when you discuss the album cover. Compare the discussion of the cover in Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band article with the Thankful (Kelly Clarkson album) article . In general with non-free images they have to be used sparingly. They have to fulfil all of the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. In the Led Zeppelin article I don't think they do. Especially criteria #1 and #8. Garion96 (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Could you please be careful about the licenses on the images you upload? I've had to delete a number of images because the copyright holder prohibited commercial use. --Carnildo 23:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image deletion

Try adding {{Db-reason}} to the image pages. If you click through to the template from here, it will give you instructions. --Dynaflow babble 22:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commercial use of Image:BOBBYBLUEBLAND.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BOBBYBLUEBLAND.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BOBBYBLUEBLAND.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:BOBBYBLUEBLAND.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chuckberry.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chuckberry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image deletion

If you want an image to be deleted and it is not a copyright violation, please list it at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion rather than adding a speedy tag. Speedy deletion only applies to a limited number of situations, and the fact that an image is unused is not one of them.

In my view, the images that you have tagged for deletion seem to be useful ones which are used appropriately in the articles about the artists. --Eastmain 23:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Humblepierockin'thefillmore.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Humblepierockin'thefillmore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Stevemarriottmemorial.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stevemarriottmemorial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Itchycoopark.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Itchycoopark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright issue with The Moments

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The Moments, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.makingtime.co.uk/rfr/moments.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Moments and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Moments with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Moments.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:The Moments/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:The Moments saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Alvestrand 20:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Music Project guidelines

Hi,

I see you are removing flags from artist infoboxes. In the comments you refer to the Wikipedia Music Project guidelines. Could you point me to these guidelines? I can't find any guidelines except for the infobox template guidelines.

Thank you! Emmaneul ^(Talk) 19:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, yes, it was news to me too, I have had flags removed and was cited re: "WP:FLAGCRUFT" by this user 156.34.142.110 Sue Wallace 19:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I think you should definitely have discussed this in Wikipedia:WikiProject Music before making any changes. Flags in infoboxes are useful for seeing at-a-glance where artists are from. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 19:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

every time I have put a flag icon in an infobox it has been removed, I have then gone in and put it back only to have it deleted again, with no discussion - see Humble Pie (band) - I am now just going along with what everyone else seems to be doing. Sue Wallace 19:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

People might delete the flags but if there is no policy or guideline to justify these actions, these large scale deletions should be discussed first. I think flags improve an infobox, so why delete them? Emmaneul ^(Talk) 20:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I actually agree with you, I think flag icons are useful - and yes they should be discussed before being deleted - I would not have deleted if user 156.34.142.110 had not given the impression that this was the RULE - as I have now since found out it is NOT the rule, I shall cease amending flag icons and will keep an eye out for others deleting them unnecessarily - I'm really not interested in being drawn into an editing war with 156.34.142.110. Many thanks Sue Wallace 20:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Emmaneul ^(Talk) 20:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: your question on my talk page

Hi Sue. I threw a quick reply to your query back on my talk page. If you want I can direct you to one of my Administrator friends who can probably clarify things much better than I can :) . Have a nice day. 156.34.142.110 21:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I am, for the most part, a vandal hunter. If I missed any cruft then I apologise for hasty editing and giving you the wrong impression. My nickname is "Libs".. a name given to me be several Wiki-administrators.(reason: I am a Librarian) Myself and my co-workers are all Wikipedia editors. I am probably the most prolific among our group. My focus is, although not completely limited to, music related articles. I was, at one time, a logged editor with over 20000 edits. I was prompted over a dozen times to allow my name to stand as a Wikipedia Admin. I declined all nomination attempts. I am not here for personal glory... just positive contribution, community and concensus. Why am I an anon? A long time ago I began to notice a growing "anti-anon" movement within the project. I did not agree with this because, as a vandal hunter, I certainly saw just as much "red-link login" vandalism as I did IP vandalism. Wikipedia was built on the contributions of anonymous editors. I decided I wanted to re-birth a trust in anonymous editing and try and foster "IP integrity" within the WIkipedia community. I walked away from my login account. And, after over 20000 edits as an anon, hopefully I have accomplished just that. My IP tends to float as I walk around the University where I work. But when I am at my desk(the IP you've been messaging) my IP is static. And that IP has been awarded several barnstars for 156.34 contributions. Not many anonymous editors get those so I am humbled for the recognition my 156.34 colleagues and I have received. If you have any questions feel free to direct them my way. I have many friends among the Wikipedia admin gang. And if I can't answer your question... I am sure I can find someone who can. Have a nice day! 156.34.212.94 23:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lal Masjid

It seems unnecessary right now seeing that this user has been blocked for violating the 3RR policy. However, I don't have any doubt that he will be back, I've put him on my watchlist and I will keep an eye on him tomorrow after his block expires. Trusilver 00:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Itchycoopark2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Itchycoopark2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:HUMBLEPIE4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:HUMBLEPIE4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Rolling Stones

Hi, I responded to your post there. You might find the essay WP:FLAG interesting reading as to where consensus is heading on this issue. --John 22:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Can I ask that you refrain from over-personalising our stylistic disagreement? Once you start reading up on this you'll see that I am far from alone in preferring to have fairly conservative use of flags in Wikipedia. For a recent example of an edit-war that centred around this issue, see the history of the Gibraltar article. I really am only a very luke-warm Scottish Nationalist, and would never dream of selectively removing England flags, which I think you were implying at one point (apologies if I read something into your comments that you didn't intend). I remove any and all that I see that aren't doing a useful job. In the same way I also remove most instances of "It should be noted that...", as this too seldom adds value to an article. Another problem is that (at least in my opinion), the over-use of flags contributes to the dumbing-down of Wikipedia. Who are these people using the encyclopedia who don't get Zimbabwe, but need  Zimbabwe instead? Our readers can read, and a good encyclopedia isn't festooned with dozens of tiny flags every time a country is mentioned. However, although I am pretty firm in my preference here, I certainly don't mind debating it further with you. Please try to assume good faith and accept that I am working (as I'm sure you are) towards the betterment of the encyclopedia. --John 05:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Hi, I'm very sorry to bother you, I noticed your name when you edited one of the pages I've been vandal watching. Can I ask you please if you are Suzy Wallace from PC Zone UK magazine? I'll keep it hush hush if you are and delete this question. I was just asking out of curiosity. Sorry for taking up your time all the same :) Ryan4314 00:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Well it was worth a shot finding out, but if it's ok with you, I'll just pretend that u were the journalist Suzy Wallace, and u asked me to keep it a secret and not to bug you with any questions, k? ;) Ryan4314 16:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Silence is Golden The Tremeloes.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Silence is Golden The Tremeloes.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:HumbleBigBlackDogsml.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HumbleBigBlackDogsml.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hot 'n' Nasty (Humble Pie song)

Hi. I removed the speedy deletion notice from the above article. The criterion cited is for bands, not songs. I wanted to suggest that you might want to consider putting {{inuse}} at the top of articles you've created while you're still establishing them. I'm a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums who frequently starts album articles, and I do this a lot just to be sure that people won't come in and start working on an article while I'm still setting it up. :) I'm not sure if it would have saved you the premature "speedy" request, but at least it might save you an edit conflict down the road. --Moonriddengirl 17:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

No star necessary. :) I'm happy if I was able to help. --Moonriddengirl 17:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Krays Film 1990.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Krays Film 1990.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Twiggy60's.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Twiggy60's.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia talk:Use of flags in articles

Hi again Sue. I noticed your post here, and, as you seem to be making a personal complaint about me rather than a general observation about the topic, I thought I would try answering your points here.

There are three things that concern me about your post.

1. By referring to me as "admin. John" you might make people think that I had used my admin powers in this matter. This would be highly inappropriate and is not something I have done or threatened to do, nor is it something I would ever do. On a matter like this I am not acting as an an admin but just an ordinary user like yourself.
2. You state that I am "deleting flags en masse". A perusal of my contributions will reveal that this is untrue. I can see less than 10 instances of this in my last 200 edits. As you can see too, several of my recent removals were based on the discussion here. I am not removing flags en masse, but as part of my ordinary work in copyediting articles I do remove redundant flags whenever I see them. Removing flags en masse would not, I think, be justified at this stage; if I was doing so I would expect criticism for it. I'd like you to recognise the distinction I am making here and refrain from mis-stating what I am doing in the future, please.
3. You said that "...John decided to edit an article I happen to have had a lot of input on (Small Faces) he deleted images (with no warnings) oh and removed the flag icon - he has never edited this article before..." I deleted nothing; in fact I removed several images from the article which were being used in contravention of their fair use rationales. Album covers are not considered to be fair use in band articles. One does not own articles here and I am perfectly entitled to edit any of our 2 million articles without seeking your permission, as long as I abide by policy. I believe I am doing so. If you believe otherwise, or if you have any other qualms about anything I am doing, the polite course of action would be to raise your concerns with me in the first instance. I would be grateful if you could do this in future. Best wishes, --John 15:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Sue, thanks for your message, I appreciate it. As a matter of fact, I came to the Small Faces article while searching for instances of mis-spellings of Steve Marriott's name, following on from our previous conversation. There weren't any in that article, but I did correct one or two, see here. (User:Spellmaster is my alternative account for making semi-automated changes.) I know we disagree on the flags issue but I hope we can disagree respectfully as I believe that is one of the best thing about this community. Take care, --John 20:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

LOL, yes it is confusing sometimes, and there is the continual worry that someone might see it as sockpuppetry, even though I am totally upfront on both user pages about it. I adopted it in consequence of a suggestion made during my RfA last year. I suppose it makes it easier for people to scrutinise my contributions, which is a good thing. --John 20:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Although it looks like you reverted your statement that the flag use guideline is "being pushed through as quickly as possible", you should know that this guideline has been under discussion for almost a year now (or half a year in its current form), which is certainly a slow pace for anything on Wikipedia :) Kaldari 21:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Humblepiealbumcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Humblepiealbumcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Typo on Jean Charles de Menezes

Hi, I just undid your quick edit to the above page, 'posited' is a real word, quite good English in fact.. Since this is not the Simple English Wiki, I think it is OK to have in the text. EasyTarget 08:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Twiggy60's.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Twiggy60's.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Herecomesthenice.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Herecomesthenice.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ogdensnutgoneflake1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ogdensnutgoneflake1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lazysundayafternoon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lazysundayafternoon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Humblepierockon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Humblepierockon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dateline Diamonds UK 1965 film.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dateline Diamonds UK 1965 film.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2007 Burmese anti-government protests

Hi Sue,

Thanks for your continued contributions to the 2007 Burmese anti-government protests page. Keep up the great work! --pmj 04:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:131.94.172.86

Hi and thanks for your message. I had a look but they seem to have stopped right after your warnings. Let me know if you ever need help again with them. --John 14:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism at Oe disambiguation page

That whatever-it-was from Edinburgh -- could that have been somehow appropriate "vandalism" ...? This odd addition was several weeks old ... and I've wondered about it since it was first posted. The initial placement was outside the conventional listing space, and I construed it as a curious kind of digital grafitti. In fact, I was loathe to remove it while I continued to ponder. Now that you've made a decision for us all, I dare ask for an explanation: (1) How did you come to this specific disambiguation page? (2) Why did you edit this specific page as you did? Curious question, I know; but please indulge me and these related questions. --Ooperhoofd 20:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your clear response to a muddled set of questions. It was odd, I know -- but I wondered?

I came to the disambiguation page because I was beginning to look into the Ōe clan in the Sengoku period of Japanese history. I don't exactly recall how it played out, but there was some kind of conflict involving the 1994 Nobel laureate in literature, Kenzaburo Oe. As you may know, Oe's son, Hikari Oe, is autistic; and as a writer, the father's life-long efforts to understand and value his son's unique perspective have modulated the broad viewpoint from which he begins to write. That hyper-sensitivity to the non-standard is doubtless one of the factors which persuaded the Nobel committee to select this Japanese writer from amongst a range of other authors being considered that year.

In other circumstances, I'm guessing that I would have quickly deleted the Edinburgh grafittists with naught but "rv" as an explanation. In this case, however, I was moved by the impression left by the several Oe books I'd read. I was given pause ....

Now that I see the way you came to the Scots "OE" gang -- that you were following a chain of anonymous vandalism, there remains no defensible reason see the line on a disambiguation page as anything but clutter. I was wrong, of course ... but this seems to me like one of those times in which I am unembarrassed to have been so bluntly wrong-headed.

Thanks again for indulging me on this.

Also, I must tell you that I did like one other thing: I was pleased that you allowed for the possibility that there might be something more to what appeared at first blush to be pointless. Your edit here was guided by a concern for what could prove to have value in the long-term context of the Wikipedia project. You asked yourself, "Is this noteable?" Answer: "No." I hope in future that I'll emulate your example. Maybe I'll remember to ask myself the same question next time. --Ooperhoofd 22:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Andrew loog oldham.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew loog oldham.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:R&B from the Marquee (album) 1962.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:R&B from the Marquee (album) 1962.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lionel Bart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lionel Bart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LOVEAFFAIR1960S.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LOVEAFFAIR1960S.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New word

The word "witnesses" has appeared in the article on Stephen Lawrence. Perhaps, we could have their names.

Still, no names are given, other than that of Brooks. Leftist rags use the plural, but there are contradictions.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LOVEAFFAIR1960S.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LOVEAFFAIR1960S.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Amy Winehouse

You have deleted a lot my edits on this topic lately. I understand that this is the type of thing you have to live with if you decide to edit a Wikipedia article. All I ask is for consistency. I have used the British tabloids because they have been a lot more accurate then the official spokespeople who keep on claiming some variation of exhaustion. Recently I did not use a cite where one of her family members predicted disaster if her husband did go to jail. I did not use it because I was afraid my edit would get deleted because it was from a tabloid and there were already family member quotes in the section. Considering the events that followed I now feel I ill served our readers by not putting it in. I did put back in the tour managers claim that he quit because he was tested positive for heroin based on second hand smoke from her because it was from ABC News a major American Network and not a tabloid and therefore a reliable cite based on any guideline one might use. Deciding the reliability of the tour manager is not a decision for you or me to make but that news organization. I have refrained so far from putting back deletions from British tabloid cites because I am American and feel that British editors would have a better understanding of their tabloids then I do. But I notice that half the cites in the article remain from the Mirror,Mail,Sun etc. So if my cites from the same sources are getting deleted I do have to wonder. As I said earlier all I ask for is consistency. I will gladly abide by a rule that only the BBC,Times of London, Guardian and that type of source can be used but if but if "tabloid" sources are going to be used please then let me make judgments on reliability. Edkollin (talk) 21:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick response. I find the idea that Wikipedia is an online version of a regular encyclopedia one of those myths editors (including me for awhile) fool themselves into believing. I have Microsoft Encarta and they have no Amy Winehouse article as of today. They have one paragraph on the Sex Pistols and call New Wave a form of postpunk music when in fact Post Punk and New Wave are different genres. Wikipedia is part of the tabloid culture. It is said that unless you have a Wikipedia article written about you you are a nobody. I see the ABC News article has been left in. Just a note I have not seen the tour managers claims in any British tabloids. The American tabloids only differ from the U.K.'s in that there is no "knock you up" phase before they knock you down. But what should matter if is what is written accurate. As far as being trying not to keep the articles from being "overly negative" that is not our job. Amy Winehouse's personal life is "overtly negative" her music is well received and that is what the article portrays. I wrote she looked emaciated and had white powder on her nose that is what the pictures in the cite showed. Also unusual about her personal life as I wrote in the regular discussion page is the singer,her family and friends have run to the press to discuss seemingly everything. So you have a lot of notable quotes and they are in the tabloids.If Brittany Spears went on the pub crawl and ended up in a coma the publicist like Amy's would have said "exhaustion" everybody would have snickered and that would have been that. But Amy herself went to a tabloid to describe her bender. This is going to make her section inherently different then other celebrity biographies.Edkollin (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Oliver222.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oliver222.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs (talk) 07:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:OLIVER111.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:OLIVER111.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs (talk) 07:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to St Mary-le-Bow

Hi. I've been WP:BOLD and made your image the lead image in the article: the old one didn't really do justice. Best. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harrods memorial

Hello, absolutely --I've been slowly working my way towards adding them there. I should have it done by the end of the day, I tend to do this sort of thing while working on some other stuff so I'm in-and-out of editing ;-) --Bobak (talk) 21:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Amy Winehouse

Thanks so much! Notes like that really keep me motivated. Thanks again.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Isla_Fisher_(actress).jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Isla_Fisher_(actress).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Myleene_Klass_(Hyde_Park,_2007).jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Myleene_Klass_(Hyde_Park,_2007).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Videmus Omnia (talk • contribs) 17:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures from Flickr

I'm very weak on what makes an image acceptable to wikipedia, but I've found that if you upload a flickr image to Wikimedia Commons an admin comes along to check the licence and confirm it's in order. An example here. You are then preserved from having to deal with a rash of "possibly unfree image" comments (if it is a free image, of course). Apologies if I'm sticking my nose in here: I found that you are still on my watchlist from St Mary-le-Bow. Nil carborundum, and keep up the good work! --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I missed that. Thanks for the clarification! --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:House of Fraser logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:House of Fraser logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Back to Black (album). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Jonathan 23:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Anglicanism

Thank you for taking the time to join the Anglicanism project. Like a number of other projects we try to have a 'collaboration of the month'.

The current Anglicanism Collaboration of the Month is Essays and Reviews The next collaboration will be selected on 30 April 2008. (Vote here)

Cheers!. Wassupwestcoast (talk) 14:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Would you take a look?

An image used in the article on the first Bangladeshi pornstar Jazmin, Image:WorshipThisBitch3.jpg, the cover of the DVD that made her the selling point, a first for a Bangladeshi, is up for deletion here. You may be interested to take a look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya Kabir (talk • contribs) 21:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello Sue Wallace! Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Getting Started General • Task for You Wikiproject Talk Page • Templates Useful Links Project Category List of Christian Topics Christianity Portal Miscellaneous Featured Articles • Good Articles Did You Know? • Work Groups Anabaptist • Core Topics Iglesia ni Cristo • Jesus • Syriac Christianity Projects Article Requests • Destubbing Campaign Assessment • Articles Needing Clean-up Peer Review • Adopted Topics Similar WikiProjects Anglicanism • Bible • Calvinism Roman Catholicism • Lutheranism

--SECisek (talk) 06:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bradford Canal

I'm afraid I had to remove your picture from Bradford Canal as it was of a different canal - the Leeds Liverpool Canal in Bingley. If you can find an image of the actual Bradford Canal please feel free to add it. NRTurner (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Greenwich Millennium Village

Hi Sue Wallace: Thanks for uploading the picture for Greenwich Millennium village. Not to quibble, since I had been hoping someone might put one up for quite a while now, but I wonder if it is the best one to illustrate the project. From the site you found, I wonder if this one might be more evocative? http://www.flickr.com/photos/martinrp/1063329015/in/photostream/ Verne Equinox (talk) 04:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which which passed nem. con. with 45 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thank you for your support and all the kind words that were expressed. I will try to live up to the trust placed in me by the community. I now have my homework to do and then pass the Marigolds.

Thanks for your kind words. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 16:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Don't know if this is of interest, I only just heard about it:

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Kbthompson (talk) 09:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyvio

The information, as presented, is a blatant cut and paste of an IMDb listing. This is not to discourage you from creating such articles; indeed, it is a wonderful blow against the blatant recentism so endemic on Wikipedia. But if the IMDb people were to come after us, there would be no defense against a claim that we've taken not only the data they have aggregated, but also the manner in which it has been presented. Just take the same information, and turn it into a normal encyclopedia article. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, certainly it's worth working on; but I'd probably advise working in a private sandbox until you get it more satisfactorily formatted, preferably with added sources outside the IMDb (not always a reliable source anyway). --Orange Mike | Talk 18:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] fairy tale

i love the world's shortest fairy tale. did you write it? --Lquilter (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Photos from Flickr

Hi Sue, good to see you bringing in photos from Flickr. Suggestion - upload them to Commons, that way they are available to websites of all languages, not just English. regardsRcbutcher (talk) 07:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Humblelogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Humblelogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ray movie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ray movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quick request

In the future, if you could use {{Film}} instead of {{FilmsWikiProject}}, I'd be very grateful. Although the latter one automatically redirects to the former, it has been deprecated, and we're trying to phase out its usage as task force tagging slowly occurs over the next year or so. Knowing that it's not being added to new articles would put me greatly at ease. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit]  :Image:Leigh on Sea shoreline.jpg

Had you considered Wikimedia commons for uploading free images?

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Indeed I did, I even joined, only the first image I uploaded was promptly deleted, no warning, no reason, so... I'll let someone else do it instead. Sue Wallace (talk) 21:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Commons is lot tougher on licensing .. That maybe why your upload got nuked... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

No, it had the same licensing as these I'm up-loading now. Hang on, I'll see if I can find the image. Sue Wallace (talk) 21:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't find it, went into my Commons log in, but it doesn't show anything uploaded. Sue Wallace (talk) 23:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Worthing Pier, Sussex.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Worthing Pier, Sussex.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Amy Winehouse

As a regular contributor to the Amy Winehouse article, you are invited to join the editing process of the article's personal life and controversy sections, temporarily located here. For discussion on recent issues, go here. For current discussions, go here.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

No thanks Sue Wallace (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Harrods

Why did you change my Harrods edits?

Also why do you agree with the sale of fur?

--81.109.107.198 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good call!

This change to the lead image was more than bold, it was a stoke of artistic genius! Fantastic stuff! -- Jza84 · (talk) 22:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetup - April 13th

London Wikipedia Meetup number 8 is happening next Sunday lunchtime (April 13th 1pm) in Holborn. Come along!

-- Harry Wood (talk) 09:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter! Issue IV - April 2008 Monthly Challenge: Article News Go on over to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity. A lot is going on and your input is needed! Look over the recent changes list for recent improvements to articles, other changes and vandalism. Articles needing improvement can be found in Category:Christianity stubs. Twenty four articles are at FA level and Forty four are GA level articles. You can help by adopting a topic. Christianity Articles by Quality Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively. Christianity articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 9 10 31 51 A 2 1 2 5 GA 5 6 16 61 8 96 B 42 95 154 261 245 797 Start 12 58 306 1248 1866 3490 Stub 16 132 2100 1656 3904 List 2 18 18 67 105 Assessed 62 187 636 3721 3842 8448 Total 62 187 636 3721 3842 8448 Project News WikiProject Christianity Coordinators : The project coordinators are generally responsible for maintaining all of the procedural and administrative aspects of the project, and serve as the designated points-of-contact for procedural issues. They are not, however, endowed with any special executive powers, nor with any authority over article content or editor conduct.The Lead Coordinator bears overall responsibility for coordinating the project; the Assistant Coordinators aid the Lead Coordinator and focus on specific areas that require special attention. The nomination period for coordinators is currently ongoing at Election 2008 Nominations for open positions will be open through 23:59 (UTC) on April 30 and project members should vote for any candidates they support by April 11 2008. The election will be conducted using simple approval voting. Any member of the project may support as many of the candidates as they wish. The candidate with the highest number of endorsements will become the Lead Coordinator (provided he or she is willing to assume the post); the next four candidates will become Coordinators. Two new workgroups formed - Indian Christianity and Methodism Portal:Indian Christianity launched. Member News Our membership continues to expand. It is currently at 184 users. 86 new users have joined the WikiProject since last issue. Please make them feel welcomed! Archives of previous newsletters can be found here. To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, add your name here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, let ~ Tinucherian know. This newsletter is automatically delivered by GrooveBot.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:British Invasion Vol 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:British Invasion Vol 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Humanitarian League

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Humanitarian League, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.henrysalt.co.uk/league.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rolling Stones debut album.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rolling Stones debut album.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Shadows group.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Shadows group.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetups - Sunday May 11th

We're hoping to have regular meetups in London. The next one is on May 11th Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Another Sunday lunch in Holborn. Come along! -- Harry Wood (talk) 11:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rolllingstones greengrass.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rolllingstones greengrass.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:The_London_Eye_at_dusk.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The_London_Eye_at_dusk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 04:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Its All About (album) Spooky Tooth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Its All About (album) Spooky Tooth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter! Issue V - May 2008 Article News 49 ( earlier 24) articles are at FA level and 94 (Earlier 44) are GA level articles. You can help by adopting a topic. Articles needing improvement can be found in Category:Christianity stubs. Project News Go on over to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity. A lot is going on and your input is needed! Look over the recent changes list for recent improvements to articles, other changes and vandalism. WikiProject Christianity Coordinators : The project coordinators are generally responsible for maintaining all of the procedural and administrative aspects of the project, and serve as the designated points-of-contact for procedural issues. They are not, however, endowed with any special executive powers, nor with any authority over article content or editor conduct.The Lead Coordinator bears overall responsibility for coordinating the project; the Assistant Coordinators aid the Lead Coordinator and focus on specific areas that require special attention. The following Coordinators were elected after Elections 2008 Lead Coordinator : John Carter Assistant Coordinators : Tinucherian and Secisek Congratulations to the newly elected Project Coordinators. It has been proposed that Wikipedia:WikiProject Serbian Orthodox Church be merged into Wikipedia:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. All opinions are welcome. One new workgroup was formed - Christianity in China Portal:Christianity in China was launched. Portal:Indian Christianity was renamed to Portal:Christianity in India Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian Christianity was renamed to Christianity in India Work Group There is also a discussion regarding whether any new subportals dealing with Christianity should be created here. All inputs are welcome. Bot Assisted Assessment was used for the unassessed project articles. Should you need any manual reassessment , kindly request it here. Member News Our membership continues to expand. It is currently at 223 users. 39 new users have joined the WikiProject in the month of April 2008. Please make them feel welcomed! Christianity Articles by Quality Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively. Christianity articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 1 9 10 31 51 A 2 1 2 5 GA 5 6 16 61 8 96 B 42 95 154 261 245 797 Start 12 58 306 1248 1866 3490 Stub 16 132 2100 1656 3904 List 2 18 18 67 105 Assessed 62 187 636 3721 3842 8448 Total 62 187 636 3721 3842 8448 To do list of the Project Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively. Here are some tasks you can do: Requests: Abolition and the churches; Abundant Living Christian Fellowship; African Universal Church; Albanian Orthodox Diocese of America; Alpha and Omega Christian Church and Bible School; Altar Fellowship; Amended Christadelphians; American Board of Missions to the Jews; American Catholic Church, Archdiocese of New York; American Christian Commission; American Missiology Society; American Mission for Opening Churches; American Rescue Workers; Antiochan Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of Mexico; Apostolic Faith (Hawaii); Apostolic Faith (Kansas); Apostolic Faith Bible College; Apostolic Faith Mission Church of God; Asbury Bible Churches; Asian-American Protestants; Assemblies of Yahweh (Michigan); Assembly of the Called Out Ones of Yah; Assembly of Yahvah (Alabama); Assembly of Yahvah (Oregon); Associated Brotherhood of Christians; Associated Churches of God; Association of Fundamental Gospel Churches; Association of Independent Methodists; Association of Seventh Day Pentecostal Assemblies; Association of United Baptists (Green River, Kentucky); Banner Herald (Progressive); Baptist Missionary Association; Barefoot Ministries; Beacon Hill Press; Benjamin Fay Mills; Berachah Church; Berean Bible Society; Bethany Bible Church; Bethel Ministerial Association; Bible Holiness Movement; Bible Protestant Church; California Evangelistic Association; Calvary Chapel Church; Calvary Ministries, Inc.; Charles M. Alexander; Christian Holiness Association; Christian Identity Church (currently a redirect); Christian Millenial Church; Christianity and the American Revolution; Christ's Church (Mormon); Christ's Sanctified Holy Church; Church of Antioch (Liberal Catholic); Church of Christ (Holiness); Church of Christian Liberty; Church of Daniel's Band; Church of God Evangelistic Association; Church of God (Jerusalem Acres); Church of God of the Mountain Assembly; Church of God (Sanctified Church); Church of God (Seventh-Day, Salem, West Virginia); Church of God (World Headquarters); Church of Israel; Church of Jesus Christ in Solemn Assembly; Church of the Bible Covenant; Church of the Living God (Christian Workers for Fellowship); Church of the Living God, the Pillar and Ground of Truth; Church of the Trinity (Invisible Ministry); Churches of God (Independent Holiness People); Community of the Love of Christ (Evangelical Catholic); Congregational Bible Church; Davis Swing; Defenders of the Faith (page currently is for a Judas Priest album); Deliverance Evangelical Centers; Divine Science Federation International; Edward Scribner Ames; Emmanuel Association; Emmanuel Holiness Church; Emmanuel's Fellowship; Evangelical Friends Alliance; Evangelical Friends Church, Eastern Region; Evangelical Mennonite Brethren Church; Evangelical Methodist Church of America; Evangelical Orthodox (Catholic) Church; Federation for Authentic Lutheranism; Federation of St. Thomas Christian Churches; Forked Deer Association (Regular); Frank Nathan Daniel Buckman; Free Church of Berkeley; Free Will Baptist Church of the Pentecostal Faith; Friends United Meeting - Western Yearly Meeting; Full Gospel Minister Association; Fundamental Fellowship; General Conference of the Evangelical Baptist Church; General Council of the Churches of God; Gospel Assemblies (Sowder); Gospel Mission Corps; Grace and Hope Mission; Grace Gospel Fellowship; Herbert Lockwood Willett; Holiness Christian Church (currently a redirect); Holiness Today; Holy Synod in Resistance; House of Prayer for All People; Hungarian Reformed Church; Independent Assemblies of God International; Independent Christian Churches International; International Evangelism Crusades; International Ministerial Fellowship; James Harvey Garrison; James Martin Gray; Jesus People Church; Johan Conrad Beissel; John William McGarvey; Kehukee (North Carolina) Association (Predesinarian); Kentucky Mountain Holiness Association; Ketocton (North Carolina) Association (Regulars); Last Day Messenger Assemblies; Liberal Catholic Church, Province of the United States; Liberty Fellowship; Lillenas; Maranatha Christian Churches; Mariavite Old Catholic Church - Province of North America; Megiddo Mission; Metropolitan Church Association; Mid-American Yearly Meeting; Midwest Congregational Christian Church; Miracles Experiences, Inc.; Mission Corp; Missionary Methodist Church; Mount Zion Sanctuary; National Association of Holiness Churches; National Council of Congregational Churches; National Holiness Association; Nazarene Compassionate Ministries; Nazarene Youth Conference; Nazarene Youth International; New Bethel Church of God in Christ; New Order of Glastonbury; North American Old Roman Catholic Church; Ohio Bible Church; Old Catholic Church (Hamel), Congregation of St. Paul; Old Catholic Church in America; Old Holy Catholic Church, Province of North America; Oriental Missionary Society Holiness Conference of North America; Orthodox Church of Canada - Orthodox Church of the New World (USA); Pacific Yearly Meeting; Pan African Orthodox Christian Church; Pentecostal Church of Zion; Pentecostal Fire-Baptized Holiness Church; Phoenix Institute (Church of Man); Prophetic Bible Conference of 1914; Prophetic Herald Ministry; Renaissance Church of Beauty; Rocky Mountain Yearly Meeting; Seventh Day Baptist General Conference; Seventh Day Church of God; Soldiers of the Cross of Christ; Sons Ahman Israel; Sucarnochee River (Mississippi) Association (Black); Sudat School Ministries; Sydney Ahlstrom; Syro-Chaldean Church of North America; Tayu Fellowship; True Church of Christ, Restored (Roberts); Union Association of Regular Baptist Churches; Union of Spiritual Communities of Christ; United Church of Jesus Christ (Apostolic); United Church of Religious Science (currently a redirect to a list); United Evangelical Churches; Universal Christian Spiritual Faith and Churches for All Nations (National David Spiritual Temple); Universal Industrial Church of the New World Comforter (One World Commune); Universal Peace Mission Movement; Upper Country Line (North Carolina) Association (Predestinarian); Walter Scott (Disciples of Christ); Wesleyan Tabernacle Association; Wesleyan Tabernacle Association of Churches; Youth in Mission; Copyedit: All Saints Church, West Dulwich, Asia-Pacific Nazarene Theological Seminary; Blessed Virgin Mary; Christian mysticism in ancient Africa; Fresh Expressions; Nazarene Caravan; Sacraments of Initiation; Soul; The Gift of God; Wikify: Nazarene Missionaries; Merge: Atonement (governmental view); Christian Church; Christian perfection; Christianity by country; Church; Eucharistic discipline; Oecumene; Open communion; Religions by country; Sinless perfection; Verify: Albert Outler; All Saints Church, West Dulwich; Antinomianism; Apocalypticism; Asbury College; Asia-Pacific Nazarene Theological Seminary; Awesome God; Catholic; Christendom; Christian; Christian counseling; Christian Science; Christian terrorism; Christianity in the Middle East; Christmas Conference (Methodism); Church; Church architecture; Connexion (religion); Darrel R. Falk; Deuteronomic Code;Evangelical Church (ECNA); Fresh Expressions; George Rapp; Georgia District Church of the Nazarene; Gideon B. Williamson; Historical Christianity; Honor Oak Christian Fellowship Centre; Hyperdispensationalism; Jacob Albright; James Dobson; John Humphrey Noyes; Justification (theology); List of churches in London; List of Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions in North America; Louis Agassiz; Manchester Higher Openshaw; Mary Baker Eddy; Methodism; Methodist Federation for Social Action; Nazarene Caravan; Nazarene International Education Association; Nazarene Publishing House; Nazarene Theological College, Manchester; O for a Thousand Tongues to Sing; Paradise Community Church; Paul Cunningham; Postdenominationalism; Predestination (Calvinism); Righteous indignation; Sacraments of Initiation; Samaritan Institute; Soul; The Bible in Spain; The Gift of God; Theotokos; William Clowes (Primitive Methodist); The Salvation Army in Manchester; Stone of Scone; William J. Prince; World Day of Prayer; Cleanup: Christendom; Christian teaching about the Devil; Christian terrorism; Connexion; Crossley Hospital; Georgia District Church of the Nazarene; Holiness movement; Hyperdispensationalism; Lord's Day; Pablo Salazar Mendiguchia; Primitive Methodism; World Day of Prayer; Expand: Apocalypticism; Christianity in the Middle East; Conservative Evangelicalism Update: Calvinistic Methodists; Karl Ullmann NPOV: Bill Gothard; Christian Hebraist; Christians United for Israel; List of Eastern Orthodox jurisdictions in North America; Mary Baker Eddy; Nazarene Missionaries; Semi-Arianism Other: Stanley Rader; Christian mysticism in ancient Africa; Consecration; NYUK; Phoebe Palmer; Sacrament; Sanctification; Seneca Falls Convention; Thomas Jay Oord; World Day of Prayer; Family Radio; Biblical hermeneutics Archives of previous newsletters can be found here. To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, add your name here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, let ~ The Newsletter Editors know. This newsletter is automatically delivered by Addbot (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC) .

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Alresford Creek sunset.gif

A tag has been placed on Image:Alresford Creek sunset.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 18:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter Issue VI - June 2008 Project news We now have 51 featured articles and 98 good articles, with the recent promotions of Hubert Walter to FA class, and Oswald of Worcester, Papal election, 1292-1294, Pontius Pilate's wife, and Towson United Methodist Church to GA level. Thanks to all those who worked on these articles! Member news The project currently has 233 members, 15 joined & 1 leavers since the start of May 2008. Other news Roman Catholic Church is currently a featured article candidate. Bath Abbey has been nominated for GA status. Related projects news New Projects and/or work groups have been proposed for Christian theology and Christian denomations. Christianity related news Barack Obama leaves Trinity United Church Court ruling on FLDS case From the Members Welcome to the Sixth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. Luckily, you all won't have to see my comments very often, as very little I have to say is really that important. But I would like to take the opportunity to say that I hope everyone finds the new General Forum page useful for discussing ideas relevant to Christianity in general, and feels free to make any additional comments regarding general Christianity there. Also, if any of you feel that you want to place a comment here in the future, please let us know what you want included. We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. John Carter (talk), Lead Coordinator Newsletter challenge We are initiating a new feature here. Every month, we will list one misisng article. The first person to start the article will be mentioned by name in the next newsletter, as well as any others should they help get included in the Main Page DYK's section. This month's article is Church of Daniel's Band. To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)