User:Pecopteris/AFD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User page Talk Page To Do List INFO AFD Control Panel
Wikipedia guidelines
Content
Article Inclusion
Notability
Classification
Editing
Discussion
Behavior
Style
Manual of Style
See also policies
Wikipedia policy
Behavioral standards
Bots
Civility
Editing policy
No legal threats
No personal attacks
Ownership of articles
Sock puppetry
Three-revert rule
User accounts
Vandalism
Notability
Inclusion guidelines
Academics
Books
Films
Music
Numbers
Organizations & companies
People
Web content
Active proposals
Aircraft
Criminal acts
Fiction
Places and transportation
Schools
Serial works
Streets and roads
Toys and games
See also
Common deletion outcomes
Wikipedia policy
Article standards
Neutral point of view
Verifiability
No original research
Biographies of living persons
Working with others
Civility
Consensus
No personal attacks
Dispute resolution
No legal threats
Global principles
What Wikipedia is not
Ignore all rules
Checkuser pages
Requests: UnlistedIP checkOn hold
Archives: MainOlderIP checksUnsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk OverviewNoticeboardProcedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through:
WP:RFCU/C/P
Common decisions & arguments
Deletion (xFD)
Arguments to avoid
Common outcomes
Overcategorisation
Adminship (RfA) &
Bureaucratship (RfB)
Arguments to avoid
Arbitration (Arbcom)
How to present a case
Past decisions
Proposals & policy
Perennial proposals
Deletion discussions
Deletion today

Deletion yesterday

Articles (by category)

Templates

Images & media

Categories (active)

User categories

Stub types

Redirects

Miscellany

Deletion review

Deletion policy
Process - log - tools

Guide - Admin guide

Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics Find sources: AFDnews, books, scholar WP:NWP:CLSWP:LISTWP:RS

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Contents

[edit] Breakout (album)

Breakout (album) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

No significant coverage in reliable sources. All I'm finding are lyrics and forums and rumors. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 03:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Turaga (Bionicle)

Turaga (Bionicle) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Relisting per DRV: AFD 2 nom: This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just a regurgitation of the plot of the various Bionicle stories from the novel and video game articles. As such, it is repetitive of that content with no out of universe information and should be deleted. MBisanz talk 03:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dickipedia

Dickipedia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non-notable, advertising, re-creation of deleted content. Probably speedy anyway. -Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 03:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment Maybe merge any useful content into 23/6 and redirect? -Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 03:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Harriet Sylvia Ann Howland Green Wilks

Harriet Sylvia Ann Howland Green Wilks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Deleted as CSD A7, in DRV some editors may have felt the text's mention of wealth was an assertion of significance or importance. Fails WP:BIO. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep, as the references provided in the article indicate sufficient coverage of this person in third-party reliable sources as to establish a presumption of her notability pursuant to our general notability guideline. John254 03:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: non-notable. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TaskMaker

TaskMaker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non-notable game which I've played the hell out of in my life. Only sources are a stubby All Game Guide review and a primary source. No other third party reviews or sources found. Has been tagged for merging with Storm Impact for ages, but nothing's come of the merge. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 22:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 03:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Comet (song)

Comet (song) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non-notable children's song. No chance of passing WP:MUSIC ;). Google search reveals that the song exists, but no one has ever thought to write about it before. -- Mark Chovain 21:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Withdrawn - new source is great. -- Mark Chovain 03:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non-notable and possible POV. --DA PIE EATER (talk) 22:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
    • POV? What? What point of view is being advanced here? Ford MF (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable, possibly OR.Renee (talk) 01:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
    • What exactly is OR about it? Ford MF (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment The WP:Music standard for songs does not work well with songs passed through the oral tradition. There have been several scholarly works that deal with children's "folk" songs, especially "subversive" songs. A search on Google scholar for "makes your teeth turn green" does generate two hits. If this deleted it should be without prejudice for recreation if a sourced version with essentially the same content is recreated. Dsmdgold (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 02:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete No reliable sources for this song. None of the sources talks specifically about the song. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 02:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep The first source is convincing enough for me. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 03:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Referenced and catalogued by notable publications. WP:MUSIC does not deal with folklore well, but that's a failing of MUSIC, not of this article. Ford MF (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment. I'd also like to note the circumstances of the extension of this AfD. After the previous contributors had voted "Delete", and while I was editing the article to put in appropriate refs, the article was in fact deleted by User:King of Hearts, who relisted it after I recreated it. Ford MF (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, well-known song, now with reference (thanks FMF). NawlinWiki (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep passes WP:Music#Songs. More than enough "verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article"  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 03:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Howard Steven Brown

Howard Steven Brown (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Unsourced biographical article. I have searched for sources about this person but I have been unable to find any connection between the person's name and the foundation he reportedly founded. I previously userfied this article because it was created by User:Hsbrown00 and the subject's initials would make him H. S. Brown. As it turns out, User:Hsbrown00 claims not to be the subject, asked that this article stop being deleted (two other admins have each deleted it once), and claimed that there are sources. So I am taking this to WP:AFD now for other editors' viewpoints. Please note that the User:Hsbrown00 page has not been edited since it was userfied; thus, it is not certain that the article is a conflict of interest/autobiography. Regardless, though, it looks appropriate for deletion per WP:BIO due to lack of verification and sources. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Allegations of Israeli apartheid

Allegations of Israeli apartheid (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Posting on behalf of another user as follows: 1)Article fails to deliver the political neutrality championed by wikipedia. That in itself should be more than enough reason to delete. 2) It is politically biased. Article is thoroughly sourced, but article is overly-dependent on biased sources (like Uri Avnery). Article fails to deliver the balance necessary to be hosted on wikipedia. 3)The article has been in clean up limbo for more than a year, but nobody has made any real attempt to do a write-up. 4)The whole concept of an Apartheid regime in Israel is flawed. The Arab minority in Israel are full citizens with voting rights and representation in the government. In the apartheid regime in SA, blacks could not vote and were not citizens of the country in which they are the overwhelming majority of the population. The article has no room for this fact. 5)Segregation is debatable, but Allegations of an Apartheid is far too sensational. 6)Unfair voice. There is no "proponent" section. The article is one big slant and has no balance. I cannot emphasize this more. 7) Some of the original authors have been banned or disciplined for wikipedia violations, though I'm not sure how relevant that is. 8) The most recent nomination had a majority delete, though the consensus was none. Not sure how important that is, but thought I'd mention it. 9)All in all, I think it is a perfect candidate for deletion. I can't think of any other reason why it should stay other than the potential to be cleaned, which as far as I can tell won't happen any time soon. If I see some pursuit by other members to fix this article, I'll gladly drop my want to delete this article. thanks for the quick response. Wikifan12345 (talk) 02:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 02:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy keep Seven AfDs strikes me as resolving the issue for a good long while. People need to stick to working on the content of the article. Thetrick (talk) 03:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep If it's POV, change it, it's not a valid reason to delete it. Nominator tries to explain why the allegations are invalid, but that's irrelevant to such a nomination, since the allegations have already been made, are citable, and it's not up to us to decide whether they're right or wrong. FunkMonk (talk) 03:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep Re: seven prior AfDs. This is a valuable article and your argument basically amounts to "it needs to be fixed, so delete it." -Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 03:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep Seven prior AfDs and two arbitrations. --John Nagle (talk) 04:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Mixtape About Nothing

The Mixtape About Nothing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Mixtape: Non-notable per WP:MUSIC. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 13:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete unless sources are added to demonstrate that this is more than your "usual" mixtape. I {{prod}}ded an earlier version of this last week, and the rationale there ("Non-notable unreleased mixtape. I can't see any way this will ever be expandable to fit WP:N.") currently still stands. iridescent 14:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep an entire article on Entertainment Weekly's website was dedicated to this mixtape. Thats more than "trivial coverage". Not to mention Julia Louis-Dreyfuss appears on this. Yes its slim, but its only been released for a week, I believe this nomination is premature.  ALKIVAR 02:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 02:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] N-Tyce

N-Tyce (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Fails WP:MUSIC. Not notable as an individual artist, redirect to Deadly Venoms. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3g iphone

3g iphone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Contested PROD. Speculation about a future product with no substantial facts, and no references. Notability not asserted. Roleplayer (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Unsourced. Re-create if the vapors solidify into a product. Thetrick (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] XMPlay

This is another software product which fails both WP:N and WP:SOFTWARE -- I am unable to locate any reliable and non-trivial third party publications about it. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 17:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 02:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] IDance

IDance (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Non-notable single, currently only on YouTube Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The International Scope Review

The International Scope Review (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

article is unsourced and notability has not been established. Appears to be a "walled garden" with Patrick Hunout and The Social Capital Foundation, all three unsourced and each attempting to prop up the others. Madagascar periwinkle (talk) 01:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Social Capital Foundation

The Social Capital Foundation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

no evidence of notability has been provided. The article was kept despite the lack of sources in 2006 hoping that expansion would provide sourcing and satisfiy notability requirements, however, this has not happened and the article should be looked at again and evidence of notability should be required. This article, together with Patrick Hunout and The International Scope Review appear to be a "walled garden" using each to support the other. Madagascar periwinkle (talk) 01:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cubans of Brazil

Cubans of Brazil (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Cuban Brazilians is not a notable community in Brazil. The population is really small, the population contribution to Brazilian culture and history is nothing. This page is nothing more than an overexaggeration of Cuban Brazilians. There is hardly any Cuban Brazilians in Brazilian society. Why is there a page for an unnotalbe community? Lehoiberri (talk) 01:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brad Chalk

Brad Chalk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Two liner. Concerned has been expressed with a tag saying does not meet WP:NN guidelines. I concur, but move it here for more to see. Brusegadi (talk) 01:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. Satisfies WP:ATHLETE, which I haven't looked at in awhile. That criteria has been reduced from "major" league professional to those "who have competed in a fully professional league". The Fort Wayne Wizards are a professional team, so the guideline criterion is satisfied, so long as verifiable sources are added to the article. Truthanado (talk) 01:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Patrick Hunout

Patrick Hunout (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

there are no reliable third party sources, so notability has not been established in accordance with WP:BIO Madagascar periwinkle (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Virtle Rock

AfDs for this article:
Virtle Rock (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Page does not assert notability; google turns up 181 hits (or 22, for some reason the numbers drop off on the second and third results pages). Most google results are mirrors of wikipedia. Page has been around for 2.5 years with minimal expansion or linking. ) WLU (talk) 00:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] What's New Happening on Disney Channel India

What's New Happening on Disney Channel India (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

WP is not a directory or TV listing. ukexpat (talk) 00:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Identifying spiders

Identifying spiders (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Basically this is the same thing as a guide to eatable mushroom identification, which I'm sure there is no place for on Wikipedia. If anywhere it'd place on Wikibooks (with expansion). — Jan Hofmann (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Delete Per what wikipedia is not. Specificly, wikipedia is not a guide. Tabor (talk) 02:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Naturopathic doctor

Naturopathic doctor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

POV fork of Naturopathy, and a dangerous one: I did a websearch for "ND legal requirements naturopathy" and found this website which says "In a state without naturopathic licensure, anyone can call him or herself a ND regardless of the level of training, experience or competence." According to the NCCAM, [1], only 11 states in the United states actually do licence them. In other words, we are making claims that everyone who designates themselves an ND is a fully-certified, highly-trained professional, something that is actually only true of a minority. This article should be deleted as a POV-fork, and/or redirected to the main article. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 00:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Does the degree exist? If so, could the article explain the problem of only certain states recognizing the degree? A2Kafir (and...?) 02:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment If the degree exists, it may be pertinent information but some caveats must be given about the 11 US states that license naturaopathic doctors. If not delete. Artene50 (talk) 02:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UFO Phil

UFO Phil (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Fail WP:BIO.The article contains no sources and I was not able to find any reliable source coverage of the subject. The article also appears to make overstated claims, one example is the article claim that he is a "regular on the nationally syndicated radio program Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, appearing frequently as a guest and contributor." The wikipedia article on Coast to Coast AM has a section about guests which he is not mentioned, he is instead mentioned in a section about callers. BlueAzure (talk) 00:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)