User:Pecopteris/AFD
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| User page | Talk Page | To Do List | INFO | AFD | Control Panel |
Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics Find sources: AFD — news, books, scholar WP:NWP:CLSWP:LISTWP:RS
Contents
|
[edit] Breakout (album)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. All I'm finding are lyrics and forums and rumors. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment – There appears to be some coverage, including in Billboard, in checking Google News. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Turaga (Bionicle)
Relisting per DRV: AFD 2 nom: This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just a regurgitation of the plot of the various Bionicle stories from the novel and video game articles. As such, it is repetitive of that content with no out of universe information and should be deleted. MBisanz talk 03:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dickipedia
Non-notable, advertising, re-creation of deleted content. Probably speedy anyway. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe merge any useful content into 23/6 and redirect? -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 03:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Harriet Sylvia Ann Howland Green Wilks
Deleted as CSD A7, in DRV some editors may have felt the text's mention of wealth was an assertion of significance or importance. Fails WP:BIO. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, as the references provided in the article indicate sufficient coverage of this person in third-party reliable sources as to establish a presumption of her notability pursuant to our general notability guideline. John254 03:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: non-notable. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] TaskMaker
Non-notable game which I've played the hell out of in my life. Only sources are a stubby All Game Guide review and a primary source. No other third party reviews or sources found. Has been tagged for merging with Storm Impact for ages, but nothing's come of the merge. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - There are certainly mentions and reviews in the contemporary computer press which could be obtained (searches found the references but no full-text of those articles so far for me). Seems to have been a game of at least some interest at the time. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 23:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Could you show me some of these sources that you found please? I didn't find anything substantial. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 11:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comet (song)
Non-notable children's song. No chance of passing WP:MUSIC ;). Google search reveals that the song exists, but no one has ever thought to write about it before. -- Mark Chovain 21:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable and possible POV. --DA PIE EATER (talk) 22:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, possibly OR.Renee (talk) 01:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The WP:Music standard for songs does not work well with songs passed through the oral tradition. There have been several scholarly works that deal with children's "folk" songs, especially "subversive" songs. A search on Google scholar for "makes your teeth turn green" does generate two hits. If this deleted it should be without prejudice for recreation if a sourced version with essentially the same content is recreated. Dsmdgold (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete No reliable sources for this song. None of the sources talks specifically about the song. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)- Keep The first source is convincing enough for me. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Referenced and catalogued by notable publications. WP:MUSIC does not deal with folklore well, but that's a failing of MUSIC, not of this article. Ford MF (talk) 03:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. I'd also like to note the circumstances of the extension of this AfD. After the previous contributors had voted "Delete", and while I was editing the article to put in appropriate refs, the article was in fact deleted by User:King of Hearts, who relisted it after I recreated it. Ford MF (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, well-known song, now with reference (thanks FMF). NawlinWiki (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:Music#Songs. More than enough "verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article" Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 03:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Howard Steven Brown
Unsourced biographical article. I have searched for sources about this person but I have been unable to find any connection between the person's name and the foundation he reportedly founded. I previously userfied this article because it was created by User:Hsbrown00 and the subject's initials would make him H. S. Brown. As it turns out, User:Hsbrown00 claims not to be the subject, asked that this article stop being deleted (two other admins have each deleted it once), and claimed that there are sources. So I am taking this to WP:AFD now for other editors' viewpoints. Please note that the User:Hsbrown00 page has not been edited since it was userfied; thus, it is not certain that the article is a conflict of interest/autobiography. Regardless, though, it looks appropriate for deletion per WP:BIO due to lack of verification and sources. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Allegations of Israeli apartheid
| Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid | Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (4th nomination) | |
| Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (5th nomination) | Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (6th nomination) | Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (7th nomination) |
| Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (8th nomination) | ||
| Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid (second nomination) |
Posting on behalf of another user as follows: 1)Article fails to deliver the political neutrality championed by wikipedia. That in itself should be more than enough reason to delete. 2) It is politically biased. Article is thoroughly sourced, but article is overly-dependent on biased sources (like Uri Avnery). Article fails to deliver the balance necessary to be hosted on wikipedia. 3)The article has been in clean up limbo for more than a year, but nobody has made any real attempt to do a write-up. 4)The whole concept of an Apartheid regime in Israel is flawed. The Arab minority in Israel are full citizens with voting rights and representation in the government. In the apartheid regime in SA, blacks could not vote and were not citizens of the country in which they are the overwhelming majority of the population. The article has no room for this fact. 5)Segregation is debatable, but Allegations of an Apartheid is far too sensational. 6)Unfair voice. There is no "proponent" section. The article is one big slant and has no balance. I cannot emphasize this more. 7) Some of the original authors have been banned or disciplined for wikipedia violations, though I'm not sure how relevant that is. 8) The most recent nomination had a majority delete, though the consensus was none. Not sure how important that is, but thought I'd mention it. 9)All in all, I think it is a perfect candidate for deletion. I can't think of any other reason why it should stay other than the potential to be cleaned, which as far as I can tell won't happen any time soon. If I see some pursuit by other members to fix this article, I'll gladly drop my want to delete this article. thanks for the quick response. Wikifan12345 (talk) 02:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 02:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral – I'm remaining neutral on this issue. My only involvement is to properly post the AfD request for Wikifan12345. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 02:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Addendum: There are two Arbitration cases that are relevant here as well: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid & Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 02:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Nobody's worked on it, but that alone is no reason to delete. Neither is a PoV dispute. This article has gone through seven AfDs and was kept each time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Seven AfDs strikes me as resolving the issue for a good long while. People need to stick to working on the content of the article. Thetrick (talk) 03:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep If it's POV, change it, it's not a valid reason to delete it. Nominator tries to explain why the allegations are invalid, but that's irrelevant to such a nomination, since the allegations have already been made, are citable, and it's not up to us to decide whether they're right or wrong. FunkMonk (talk) 03:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Re: seven prior AfDs. This is a valuable article and your argument basically amounts to "it needs to be fixed, so delete it." -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Seven prior AfDs and two arbitrations. --John Nagle (talk) 04:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Mixtape About Nothing
Mixtape: Non-notable per WP:MUSIC. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 13:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless sources are added to demonstrate that this is more than your "usual" mixtape. I {{prod}}ded an earlier version of this last week, and the rationale there ("Non-notable unreleased mixtape. I can't see any way this will ever be expandable to fit WP:N.") currently still stands. — iridescent 14:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep an entire article on Entertainment Weekly's website was dedicated to this mixtape. Thats more than "trivial coverage". Not to mention Julia Louis-Dreyfuss appears on this. Yes its slim, but its only been released for a week, I believe this nomination is premature. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 02:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 02:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep per the EW article, I'm sure more reliable sources exist or at least will exist given the album's newness. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] N-Tyce
Fails WP:MUSIC. Not notable as an individual artist, redirect to Deadly Venoms. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete She is not a notable rapper. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 14:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy redirect to Deadly Venoms. Not notable on her own, but no reason to delete outright. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 15:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Deadly Venoms. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 3g iphone
Contested PROD. Speculation about a future product with no substantial facts, and no references. Notability not asserted. Roleplayer (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Unsourced. Re-create if the vapors solidify into a product. Thetrick (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] XMPlay
This is another software product which fails both WP:N and WP:SOFTWARE -- I am unable to locate any reliable and non-trivial third party publications about it. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 17:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 02:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] IDance
Non-notable single, currently only on YouTube Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Do U(knome)? yes...|or no · 02:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The International Scope Review
article is unsourced and notability has not been established. Appears to be a "walled garden" with Patrick Hunout and The Social Capital Foundation, all three unsourced and each attempting to prop up the others. Madagascar periwinkle (talk) 01:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Social Capital Foundation
no evidence of notability has been provided. The article was kept despite the lack of sources in 2006 hoping that expansion would provide sourcing and satisfiy notability requirements, however, this has not happened and the article should be looked at again and evidence of notability should be required. This article, together with Patrick Hunout and The International Scope Review appear to be a "walled garden" using each to support the other. Madagascar periwinkle (talk) 01:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cubans of Brazil
Cuban Brazilians is not a notable community in Brazil. The population is really small, the population contribution to Brazilian culture and history is nothing. This page is nothing more than an overexaggeration of Cuban Brazilians. There is hardly any Cuban Brazilians in Brazilian society. Why is there a page for an unnotalbe community? Lehoiberri (talk) 01:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Brad Chalk
Two liner. Concerned has been expressed with a tag saying does not meet WP:NN guidelines. I concur, but move it here for more to see. Brusegadi (talk) 01:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Satisfies WP:ATHLETE, which I haven't looked at in awhile. That criteria has been reduced from "major" league professional to those "who have competed in a fully professional league". The Fort Wayne Wizards are a professional team, so the guideline criterion is satisfied, so long as verifiable sources are added to the article. Truthanado (talk) 01:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Patrick Hunout
there are no reliable third party sources, so notability has not been established in accordance with WP:BIO Madagascar periwinkle (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Virtle Rock
Page does not assert notability; google turns up 181 hits (or 22, for some reason the numbers drop off on the second and third results pages). Most google results are mirrors of wikipedia. Page has been around for 2.5 years with minimal expansion or linking. ) WLU (talk) 00:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Physical locations are generally notable, but I think they still have to meet WP:V, and this one doesn't. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] What's New Happening on Disney Channel India
WP is not a directory or TV listing. ukexpat (talk) 00:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a TV directory. What the nom said. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per the above rationale and also as at least arguable wikispam. Erechtheus (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Identifying spiders
Basically this is the same thing as a guide to eatable mushroom identification, which I'm sure there is no place for on Wikipedia. If anywhere it'd place on Wikibooks (with expansion). — Jan Hofmann (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete Per what wikipedia is not. Specificly, wikipedia is not a guide. Tabor (talk) 02:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Naturopathic doctor
POV fork of Naturopathy, and a dangerous one: I did a websearch for "ND legal requirements naturopathy" and found this website which says "In a state without naturopathic licensure, anyone can call him or herself a ND regardless of the level of training, experience or competence." According to the NCCAM, [1], only 11 states in the United states actually do licence them. In other words, we are making claims that everyone who designates themselves an ND is a fully-certified, highly-trained professional, something that is actually only true of a minority. This article should be deleted as a POV-fork, and/or redirected to the main article. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 00:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Does the degree exist? If so, could the article explain the problem of only certain states recognizing the degree? A2Kafir (and...?) 02:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment If the degree exists, it may be pertinent information but some caveats must be given about the 11 US states that license naturaopathic doctors. If not delete. Artene50 (talk) 02:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] UFO Phil
Fail WP:BIO.The article contains no sources and I was not able to find any reliable source coverage of the subject. The article also appears to make overstated claims, one example is the article claim that he is a "regular on the nationally syndicated radio program Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, appearing frequently as a guest and contributor." The wikipedia article on Coast to Coast AM has a section about guests which he is not mentioned, he is instead mentioned in a section about callers. BlueAzure (talk) 00:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

