Panitumumab
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Panitumumab?
|
|
| Therapeutic monoclonal antibody | |
| Source | Human recombinant |
| Target | EGFR |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS number | |
| ATC code | L01 |
| PubChem | ? |
| Chemical data | |
| Formula | C6306H9732N1672O1994S46 |
| Mol. mass | ? |
| Pharmacokinetic data | |
| Bioavailability | ? |
| Metabolism | ? |
| Half life | ∼7.5 days (range: 4-11 days) |
| Excretion | ? |
| Therapeutic considerations | |
| Pregnancy cat. |
? |
| Legal status |
℞ Prescription only |
| Routes | intravenous |
Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) is a fully human monoclonal antibody specific to the EGF receptor (see illustration)[2].
Panitumumab is manufactured by Amgen and marketed as Vectibix.
Contents |
[edit] Uses
It was FDA approved for the first time in September 2006, for the "the treatment of EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer with disease progression" despite prior treatment [1]. Panitumumab was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on December 3, 2007. Research showed that panitumumab is only effective in patients having the wild type of KRAS gene.
[edit] Mechanism
The compound works by binding to the extracellular domain of the EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) preventing its activation. This in turn, results in halting of the cascade of intracellular signals dependent on this receptor. [2]
[edit] Production
Panitumumab is produced by immunization of transgenic mice (xenomouse), that are able to produce human immunoglobulin light and heavy chains. After immunization of these animals a specific clone of B cells that produced an antibody against EGFR was selected and immortalized in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. These cells are then used for the full scale manufacture of the antibody.
[edit] Panitumumab vs. cetuximab
Although they both target the EGFR, panitumumab (IgG2) and cetuximab (IgG1) differ in their isotype and they might differ in their mechanism of action. Monoclonal antibodies of the IgG1 isotype may activate the complement pathway and mediate ADCC (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity) better than their IgG2 counterparts, hence although they have not been documented, differences in the responses in treatments with these two antibodies might be expected. [3]
[edit] References
[edit] Further reading
Philippe Rougier, Emmanuel Mitry, Sophie Dominguez. Les Cancers Digestifs ; Springer , September 1, 2006, page=291 ; language=French
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||

