Talk:Noh-Varr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (publisher): Marvel Comics work group

Contents 1 Use of the word "Fuck 2 Present Tense 3 Ultimate Marvel? 4 Fair use rationale for Image:MarvelBoy1-2000.jpg

[edit] Use of the word "Fuck

Reading the message Noh-Varr carves into New York city:

We've had an "Explative you", with the explative linking to the actual "naughty" word.

Then someone decided it was silly to edit the word itself.

Then someone decided it was necessary to delete this section. Perhaps they were offended?

Can we aggree that it's a funny part of the series, and that it should be included in the bio. Although it probably is silly to censor the word itself, it's probably best if we include the info. but couch it in a sort of "explative deleted" kind of way. This way, no one is offended.

Bhissong 23:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)bhissong

Someone deleted the same section of bio. concerning Noh-Varr's attack on NYC. PLEASE, if you have an opinion on this section, write it here on the discussion page before making a deletion.

Bhissong 01:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)bhissong

"Fuck" restored. Wikipedia is not censored. 72.73.195.56 02:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Makes sense. Since this site is not censored, there should be no reason to remove the "Fuck." Good call. I change my position: I say leave the "Fuck." Bhissong 19:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)bhissong

[edit] Present Tense

I went through the text and simply changed the tense from past to present in accordance with the wiki. character-article guidelines. Bhissong 22:53, 27 June 2006 (UTC)bhissong

[edit] Ultimate Marvel?

Well, it appears that Noh-Varr is in fact part of the 616 universe. So, should the "Ultimate Marvel?" sub-section of this article go, since it now seems irrelevent? Thoughts? Bhissong 18:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)bhissong

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MarvelBoy1-2000.jpg

Image:MarvelBoy1-2000.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)