User talk:Longhair/Archive19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Reference tags

Hi. Thanks for all your hard work in tagging articles where additional or complete referencing is needed. I did want to direct your attention to guidelines for use in most reference needed templates that suggest that the usual practice is to place them at the top of the article unless the template is for a specific section concerned. It's easier to see, and gets more attention than when placed at the bottom. I happened to notice this when I was looking at articles for members of the Monkees. In any case, thanks! Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps, but there are differences between aesthetics, opinions and guidelines. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Rudget!

Dear Longhair, my sincere thanks for your support in my second request for adminship, which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, Dihyrdogen Monoxide and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 16:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Adelaide Wikimeetup 3

Riverside Precinct Adelaide Meetup
Next: TBA
Last: 20 Apr 2008
This box: view • talk • edit

Hi Longhair - we're planning a third meetup in Adelaide sometime in the coming weeks, and would love to have you there. If you can, please help decide a location, a date and a time here. Thanks! ~ Riana ⁂ 14:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you indicated interest at Meetup 2. If you do not live in Adelaide/South Australia and cannot make it to the meetup, please accept my apologies!

I realise it'd be a bit of a drive for you ;) ~ Riana ⁂ 14:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

My userpage

Hello Longhair. I copied the file from the main article Kyle Katarn and then I added it to my userpage. Am I allowed to do so? D@rk talk 21:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi there again. I only added the image of the main article from Kyle Katarn. Will it be accepted too? D@rk talk 13:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hoodoo Gurus

How far away from a GA status do you think this article is? Dan arndt (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

King Tide

Could I get you or someone to rename this article to 'King Tide (album)' to avoid confusion with the article on King tide. Dan arndt (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Aust Barnstar

The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
for your efforts with Australian articles Gnangarra 00:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa

I wish to thank you for being supportive of my effort to regain my adminship. Though it was not successful, your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 17:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

A favour

I wonder if you (or anyone else reading this) would mind looking at Template:WikiProject Cricket and providing some advice. There's two issues.

  1. A project member has added a "Bottom-importance" to the code and created the respective categories. The rationale for this is good, but is it possible for the bot which updates the log and statistics tables to be changed to cope with this? If not, I'd guess we need to go back to top, high, mid and low.
  2. Is a "List-Class" able to be added? And if so, would you mind.

Reply here if you like. —Moondyne 04:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, after doing some more reading and thinking since the above post, I reckon that its not all that critical if the bottom parameter articles don't go into the bot processing. As long as they get categorised, and they are. —Moondyne 23:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate your taking time out to clarify the issue on the category thing. I realise I might have confused some of the processes - thanks for separating it all out :) SatuSuro 15:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Linkspam

Hey Longhair, you reverted my anon edit of a link to Australia 2020 Summit. I added http://2020summit.org/ as external link to the same article while logged in and as they have a similar function, I wonder why you consider one is linkspam and another is not. cheers, pfctdayelise (talk) 06:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello,
As it is such a new thing it's not like there is a ton of established resources on the topic. I don't think either of them are "spam" as in inappropriate or indiscriminately-placed links.
I added them because it is a new topic that explicitly invites participation from all citizens. As the official site is static, people who come to Wikipedia are likely to be looking for ways to participate. Those links bother offer ways of participating.
Mostly I guess I am curious if the revert was "anon bias". cheers, pfctdayelise (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

No worries, thanks for your quick response to the user Melburnian (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Message, then

I recieved a message saying that my change of the article of Randle McMurphy was not constructive and that if I continued I would be banned. I added in that McMurphy tried to rape Nurse Ratched and tore off her clothes to show that she was not a machine but in fact very much human and as vulnerable as the rest of us. If you've read the book and disagree with my interpretation, i would be more than happy to discuss it, but as it is, this is the way that the book portrays this event, and i do not appreciate being told i will be banned if i continue in this fashion, which i can only take to mean that if i continue to make posts that are relevant and completely true, i will be banned. Please either take down your bot or script it so it is not as broad and does not message people who only trying to actually make Wikipedia a more correct and better place. Cheers man. --Eidlyn (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, that would be great. It doesn't happen in the film because the film dumbed down a lot of the book, but in the end, he definitely rips off part of her clothes and I believe he does begin to rape her or its implied that he does. Also, how do you send messages using this thing? I'm sorry for the heated message, I was just a little peeved that you're automated message was threatening to ban me when, i think you'll agree, i really wasn't trying to just mess up the article, just adding more information. Cheers --Eidlyn (talk) 08:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Then I'm sorry for flying off like that. Pg 275,"performing a hard duty that finally just had to be done, like it or not" i believe implies attempted rape, especially since he just tore her uniform down the middle with her breasts hanging out and everything. By the way, yea i know you aren't a bot, I just thought you had a bot gunning for you.--Eidlyn (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Electronicfrontiersaustralialogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Electronicfrontiersaustralialogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Flag Question

Hello Longhair, just wondering how you got the aussie flag to the top right hand side of your user and user talk page? Cheers Wiki ian 08:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Columns

Hello again Longhair, can you please refer me to a wiki help page that talks about columns? If you do not know of any could you point out a few wiki pages that uses them? kind regards, Wiki ian 10:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

You Idiot!

Hey Longhair, why did you delete my Dan Barr page?! I am very angry at you! Book it on home! Go! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alloutsports11 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Well it takes all kinds

Yep I forgot the afl tag (again) oh well another day another tag :( SatuSuro 11:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Melpedia Link

Thanks for giving me an explanation on why you removed the page, but delisting it because it only has 5 users, is that a valid reason? It doesn't mention registered user base as one of the reasons for removing a wiki. I've put in maybe 200 hours into the wiki, including photographing many streets and locations in the Melbourne CBD. I'd like you to perhaps browse the site a bit more, in particular the the allpages link, you'll see that it is not a new wiki, nor is it that small. KiwiTallGuy (talk) 10:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, my bad, I've reread the external links article and perhaps it isn't of a criteria to be added yet. Strange, though, I have other wikis listed in Wikipedia that are of a smaller size then this site and I haven't added the links myself, other Wikipedia editors have. I guess I'll wait for that to happen in this case as well. KiwiTallGuy (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

re. Giggy got funny mouth

This made me laugh (out loud btw). You're a funny guy. Regarding your last RfA, I said I'd support some time in the future. Just letting you know your efforts around here of late have "earned" my support, whatever that's worth these days :) Until you chose to run again... Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 11:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hehehe, thanks for that. It's always nice to be rewarded for enforcing core policy! I don't plan to run for RfA any time in the near future, mainly because I'm happy being a cynical promoter of moar swearing doing what I'm doing now (read; clogging up AWNB/A with my FxCs). But yeah, maybe one day in the future. btw. I noticed you haven't yet supported Riana's RfB. Maybe you should based on my commentary there ;) Cheers mate, dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 22:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

ANI thread

Can you come back to here if you have the time or interest please. I need to get some more views on what I think continues to be a complex case of conflict of interest by this editor - and whether this should just got to the Wikipedia Foundation now rather than us trying to deliberate it further. Thank you.--VS talk 10:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Crackerjack.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Crackerjack.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mallboyfilm.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mallboyfilm.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:DeathinBrunswick.jpg

I have tagged Image:DeathinBrunswick.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bad boy bubby.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bad boy bubby.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mother Goose stuffed.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mother Goose stuffed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Pinball Links

Hey, Sorry I was unaware Wikipedia's restrictions on adding links to websites that you own. I personally feel that the information provided on the website is a worthwhile external link, and due to how often the information is updated hard to add to each Wikipedia entry. And due to the mass removal of the links yesterday after being on the encyclopedia for several months now without any discussion was malicious. Are you saying to re include each link it has to be discussed on the separate talk pages? Muddyboy (talk) 08:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


China Pacific Insurance

Please don't delete the title called "China Pacific Insurance". I am editing it now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky@36 (talk • contribs) 08:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Please be patient and wait for a while. I found the administrators are abnormally quick to delete articles in English version. This is NOT rubbish title and don't worry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky@36 (talk • contribs) 08:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow...

Thanks for the revert... they're mad at me! :) Jmlk17 09:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No problems on the reverts, you guys seemed to have a fistful of trolls tonight. Glad I could help. Redrocket (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Rangeblock

I'm no good with them... but that loser needs to be rangeblocked for sure. Jmlk17 09:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Hm, perhaps I protected your userpage too early? If I knew you did a range block, I would have left it. Anyway, you can obviously unprotect your page whenever you want, cheers. Spellcast (talk) 09:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Anything to stop a bot tagging it for deletion is always good! Spellcast (talk) 10:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

^_^ Extreme speed!

[1][2]

1 minute!

How did you pull that off? dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 11:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

...that's a scary thought. I think IRC has slowed my reflexes :( dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 11:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I think User:Lankiveil/Not Dihydrogen Monoxide answers your question. Not mine, just a joke. Still...freakishly fast! Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 11:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Right place, right time, that's where the speed came from. Nothing more. No bots, only fingers here. -- Longhair\talk 11:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

looked like

It was going on too long, so classically the cat terror from the west struck :( - anytime btw SatuSuro 23:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Indigenous people of Australia

Thanks for updating the template Paul foord (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Merci,Grazie,Thanks you, Gracias, Spassiba, Xie Xie,... Et caetera for the automatic welcome! Otourly (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Fuck (disambiguation)

Please stay off my talk page. It seems that I contested a page and now I am getting flooded. Maybe you should look into that. I have finished with the subject a while ago. However, I will take it to the next level tomorrow, as per wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thright (talk • contribs) 01:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Good luck. -- Longhair\talk 02:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thank you. I know this is a heated topic, but I wish all users acted with repect. Thright (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
Please help, my talk page is still being rv. Can you ask all to stop. Thank youThright (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
thanks for you reply. I can't believe this, it over two tags on a page entitled "FUCK"! WOW Thright (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
Help me clean the page up! "I don't think (s)he'll listen to me or any other admin, given how handily (s)he disregarded it and started playing the "Jack Thompson" card... :( -Jéské (v^_^v :L5 Tediz Strong) 02:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)" is a personal attack. That should go and all ill mention comments about me. Second, I am not happy with how Jeske handled herself, is there anything I can do? A sorry from her will be all that I ask. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thright (talk • contribs)
Im sorry, I require some more help. I have let it go! and thus I hope others will too, however this line was added, "I have dropped it, and and such. Another use came along and added another line. Then you close with "I actually gave notice to Thright's talk page in regards to that actually. It's becoming tiresome to have to deal with the nagging that goes along with it, at various user talk pages and here. It's a dead issue. And with that... seicer | talk | contribs 04:06," I have replied on seicer's talk page. All I want is for the line to be deleted. I feel that he is trying to start a fight. As for me, this issue is over. Thanks for your help Thright (talk) 04:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright

Thright

I really don't think I'm hounding for answers about anything, and I posted in response to a question I was asked. Had Thright not initiated a conversation with me, I would not have continued discussing anything with him. This was deleted as "being flooded". I find this somewhat rude, and I guess I felt it important to point that out. I'm going offline anyway, so I never had the intention of continuing the discussion, but I don't especially care to be asked something and then metaphorically slapped in the face when I answer. Natalie (talk) 04:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Good to see my pages are well protected while I'm otherwise engaged --Closedmouth (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

You Suck

Tell me not be put crap on a page!! my information was truthful and well noted in the city of orange! and maybe you should take a peek at tha page and then decied what is crap and what isnt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.187.38 (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Schapelle Corby

She appears after Si Yi Chen, and then again after Renae Lawrence. -- JackofOz (talk) 09:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Agree

Very much so - needs big work similar at that one yet undone - thanks for replying on this - will try some work on it - the sources arent as comprehensive as for the later one - cheers and thanks and best of luck with email stuff - funny I have had a disabled account unchecked from 4 months ago i have been meaning to get done :( SatuSuro 11:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Frank Zappa - voice - mock serious I can relate to that! SatuSuro 11:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your non-admin username

I've responded on my talk page. Tra (Talk) 10:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism

Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page! Much appreciated. Do you accept barnstars? - DiligentTerrier and friends 23:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


OK, here you go: - DiligentTerrier and friends 00:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The Diligent Terrier Barnstar of Diligence
For reverting vandalism on my talk page, Longhair is awarded the Diligent Terrier barnstar of diligence. Congratulations! - DiligentTerrier and friends 00:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Minor Barnstar
For doing all those "Longhair jobs" that nobody else can be bothered doing! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 08:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Cometstyles has smiled at you and showered you with WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:User:Cometstyles/smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

P.S.. it has been nearly 4 years now, please get a hair-cut :DD ...--Cometstyles 08:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Or else rename to User:RidiculousHippyHair. I'd come to the next Melbourne meetup for that! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 08:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
A wise man once said, "Believe half of what you read, and nothing of what you hear" :). I had the chop back in the days when Windows 3.1x was king. The nickname has stuck. Some mates never let you forget :) -- Longhair\talk 18:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Problems is when some of us had hair (sic) many wikipedia eds (1) were in nappies in that era (2) not even considered for the lottery of life (3) whereas some of us were working hard for 200 a week :) SatuSuro 23:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Peace
For showing the skills of excellent mediator. You did not show bias and helped both sides. Thank you |so much. Thright (talk) 05:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC) |}

furthermore

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Award
Sats, one of the nuisance (unwise) eds (and bald to boot) of the Indonesian Project is in awe of your |capacity to cope with the onsloughts of pestilence plague and damnation on your talk page - from those with little capacity to understand anything - bit like the |late douglas adams's vogon chiefs perspicacity and understanding of literary criticism and the use of irony - may you rest easy that your resistance to the madness |is indeed not useless :) SatuSuro 13:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting the blanking of my talk page. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 11:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

And mine, as well. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

re: Yuckfoo

Thanks for the heads up, I'll take that off her talkpage. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Then in that case, I'll leave the comment and maybe she'll respond to me. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Bond

see Harry Potter fandom‎ Ultra! 08:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Decompression sickness

As the number of references have increased from 1 to 18, I hope you don't mind but I've removed the refimprove tag you placed on Decompression sickness in January.

Please feel free to revert if you believe additional citations are still needed, but it would obviously more helpful if you could flag where you think such citations may be needed with a fact tag. --RexxS (talk) 21:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Do we get prizes?

For alerting others to the items that seem to break more rules than we actually have? (someone else alerted me anyways) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Government_schools_in_New_South_Wales has been noticed and is being discussed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board - cheers SatuSuro 00:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC) That in itself which you state - it could be a project unto itself :( SatuSuro 01:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Priscilla Ahn

I prodded Priscilla Ahn and the prod was just removed by the creator. It seems to have been expanded more before the creator removed it, so is it possibly notable now? Or should it be AFD'd? -WarthogDemon 04:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:BendigoAdvertiser.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BendigoAdvertiser.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

SKA-B-Q

You added a notability tag on the article, but did not speedied it. Why? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Cap'n'cupcake

can you help me? I trying to get something ready for a wikia, but it dosen't have all the things I need like wikipedia, get back to me sonn please. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

we'll I'm having problems redirecting one thing to my User profile. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I was just tring that out. I was one of the players, ("Cap'n'cupcake") and on the wikia I want to link it to my User page. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I won't do it again, I tried Sandbox but I think it didn't work. This is what I'm having trouble with. --Cap'n'cupcake (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Did I metion it was not for wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cap'n'cupcake (talk • contribs) 02:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Criticism of Jimbo Wales

The Register has recently been critical that some people do not have enough criticism in their article and surely we should set a good example by ensuring all criticism of Jimbo, not matter how trivial is documented. The tiny amount in Jimbo's article is a whitewash. Trying to censor or delete such an article will be a PR disaster for Wikipedia.Momento (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

another vandalism

Hi! :) I have just sighted another vandalism by User_talk:165.228.191.241. I believe you are an admin, and so you may want to block this user. Thanks. Marax (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Miss me?

You're awesome! Probably the best editor yet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.90.217.145 (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry About That

My apologies for the a.k.a Jersey article. I hit a couple of wrong buttons, didn't mean to leave things blank like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.T. Havoc (talk • contribs) 04:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

err.. okay

I just thought Magfeed.com was as note worthy as any of the other web based aggregators. *cough* Planet aggregator It's wiki based if that gives it any extra cred. No bfd.

Try it out. If you like it, consider a reinstatement.

Word,

--Bowl of vindaloo (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Martin Bryant.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Martin Bryant.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lawrence § t/e 19:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TenApplesUpOnTop cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TenApplesUpOnTop cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Newcomb, Victoria

A tag has been placed on Newcomb, Victoria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblbrox (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Corey Worthington

Corey Worthington he isn't going to be an intruder. Also vandalism

From Jonnymore2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnymore2008 (talk • contribs)

I am trying to be Good Faith on this website because. which really i am.

it my first go trying to delete information Corey Worthington .

SO Give me A break dont undo Corey Worthington information please From Jonnymore2008


IM AM NOT TRYING TO vandalize on the 2008 Big Brother Website please leave me alone please.

I am trying to fix up information.

IM AM BEING GOOD FAITH WITH YOU> SO DONT UNDO PLEASE From Jonnymore2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnymore2008 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Big Brother Australia 2008. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: 3RR on Big Brother Australia 2008

I left a warning on both talk pages. After looking I noticed that you were reverting vandalism but you both appear to be in an edit war. That is why I left the message. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Camerons Corner 3 borders.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Camerons Corner 3 borders.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 02:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Dingo fence Camerons Corner.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Dingo fence Camerons Corner.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 04:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

AWB

Hi, I noticed that your bot hasn't used AWB for a considerable amount of time. If you still have plans to use it, please let us know so that we could remove unneeded bots from the check page. Cheers, MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 07:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh boy

Count me out (previous message) looks like trying to grab time - as if there was any - I do hope having your talk page satusuro free has calmed things down a bit :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Friedrich - I have just looked at this after seeing your tagging our great western australian hero l c - and am astonished the art can have gone so long with a personal talk message and a possible copyvio on the art mainspace for so long (a year and all those eds?)- is there a reason for that? I gotta get off (said that an hour ago to myself) I would have thought the quote is potentialy copyvio and POV whatsmore - but a talk item in mainspace for that long - the oggle minds, oops mind boggles SatuSuro 03:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC) no urgency - get better! SatuSuro 03:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks for that - Its just that some arts i check at 8- 9 am perth time have been open vndlsm since 3 or 4 am and have got through - but that takes the cake - a year... oh well - cheers SatuSuro 09:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

thanks for this cleanup

here, I'm never quite sure when people are attached to their previous stubs TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm reporting you...

You had absolutely no right to delete my user page. "Blatant Advertising" indeed: what the hell was I advertising? I'm taking this to WP:ANI as I am extremely angry with my treatment here so far. Missing 4 Year Old (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 09:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha...you get accused of the weirdest things! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Kidnapper now hey... and I haven't even left the country since 2003? -- Longhair\talk 09:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, minor...and you don't need to leave the country when the country comes to you...*confused face* dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hmm, if publishing this book can get me through yr. 12, I'm all for it! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
*cheesy grin* dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
LOL. Is it still April Fool's Day? Well, at least you were not accused of being a sockpuppet. Bearian (talk) 13:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

DMR

Have you heard of DMR? From what I know they built/designed bridges (such as Image:Marshalls Creek Bridge.jpg). I've found little about them which doesn't surprise me (most likely one of those companies that fold or get bought out) and would you know any road experts or know a bit about the history of the road network in NSW? Bidgee (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Bugger! :( I'll try the Council (They have to have some sort of history) and the RTA (I'm yet to get a reply on a few other matters). Bidgee (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh highly esteemed reported one

Category:Australian mobsters - I have just tagged with the ole WP OZ etc - and noticed that it had been previously deleted - realising your mixing with the high fallutin parts of oz society in yr editing - wondered whether the resurrection of this cat is kosher or not? Just asking - no big deal either way SatuSuro 01:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah glad you agree - I am off more than on today maybe you might like to do the honours? An oz cfd? SatuSuro 01:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Gawks - dont let me start - there im trying to get off and you use that word! focus, focus - indeed my mental wikipedia to do list is always 10 times larger than time and reality ever allow me - have a good day - i better get off now - cheers SatuSuro 01:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

So it looks like you really have cleaned up the mobsters - once and for all with template as well ! well done! SatuSuro 11:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Just about to get off but in these delightful climes that we are doing things with - some smartie (i hope it wasnt me) i think had added law project to one of the wider cats like crims of oz - i would have thought that just crime=yes is enough for these happy chappy categories - watcha think? (im off for maybe a few days now) - cheers SatuSuro 06:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your welcome! I do intend to stay on Wikipedia, however i do not wish to saty in England. Will this affect my Wikipedia account and internet connection??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishman66 (talk • contribs) 09:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

24.61.133.186

You may want to follow up from that ex-article. I'll leave a note on the creators talkpage. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmm? Seems a bit harsh. Wonder if you guys have your finger on the pulse of all newcomers that try to take in all the rules and recs. Won't bother again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loxford (talk • contribs) 14:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Loxford (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Qualia (hotel)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Qualia (hotel). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 03:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Move of Robert Dziekański Taser incident

This comment is in reference to your move to Robert Dziekański taser incident. I disagree that "Taser" should be uncapitalized, as a Taser, not a electroshock weapon made by a different manufacturer, was used. I wrote a style discussion at Talk:Taser#Capitalization of noun; feel free to comment on anything that I missed. Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick reply. Flatscan (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Carmel Charles

Do you think this article is stub? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 02:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi

How do i report someone —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishman66 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU/OC

Hello . The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. With the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. bibliomaniac15 02:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

You will also need to add [[Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot]] to your userpage in order for SoxBot V to automatically update your online/offline status. If you do not added this text, you will always be listed as "offline" at HAU. Thanks. Useight (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Highways

Rom rulz424 (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • email) keeps adding Stuart Highway twice in List of highways in Northern Territory and keeps on reverting in Goldfields Highway. Could you review the edits made if possible? Bidgee (talk) 15:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. --Aleenf1 09:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Maharajbagh zoo

I just now created this article and in less than a minute it was tagged by you as missing citation. As you could see I had already added citation to the page but only forgot to mention reflist below so they were not visible. Before I could add it the tag came on. I would suggest you wait for people to correct it for themselves first. Wait for atleast 5 mins before tagging. --gppande «talk» 09:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anitacobby.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Anitacobby.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anitacobbypagaentwin.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Anitacobbypagaentwin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Australian story.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Australian story.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BRAZEL.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:BRAZEL.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BarryLane.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:BarryLane.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Beckett2.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Beckett2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Demographics WikiProject

  • Nothing amiss - my edit preceded your fix of the template! I should have known. Many thanks for your help! Regards --Matilda talk 00:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello mr longhair nice person - I have a horrible suspicion the template at Demographics wants NA and not cat - I had just tagged cat pages with cat and they seemed to be gathering in a group at what looks like the wrong location (to me - its a few months since i did my last dash at this in the oz project domain) - sincerest apols if i got it wrong - you might want to let me know whether the coding prefers NA or not - i might be off for a bit today - again - apols if it is wrong SatuSuro 01:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC) OK if it looks ok at your end - thats ok - i think it is the long term pavlovian category tagging response to expect the Indonesian project tagging with the class = NA that when I see category talk pages turn up anywhere else than 'non-art category pages' after my brilliant oops of the other year with cat tagging ... thanks for that SatuSuro 06:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

AIV

Thanks Prom3th3an (talk) 07:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU

Sorry to bother you about this again, but you have yet to update your information at Highly Active Users. If you do not update your entry, it will be removed within 48 hours. Thanks. Useight (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MalePregnancy poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:MalePregnancy poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)