User talk:Cvene64

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] ANZC Scores

I was just about to add it and you beat me to it!--HamedogTalk|@ 08:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rugby World Cup

It may go on the main page soon!!! Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 22, 2006--HamedogTalk|@ 09:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Its offical - Oct 24! Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 24, 2006--HamedogTalk|@ 12:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


You may want to choose which image should go at the top of the page. Here are some - Image:Mike Tindall Webb Ellis.JPG, Image:Free RWC William Webb Ellis.PNG, Image:Webb Ellis Trophy.jpg and Image:William Webb Ellis Cup.jpg. Your choice. Also tell User:Raul654 which image you would like to go on the main page.--HamedogTalk|@ 06:16, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SF

Hey there! thanks for your msg. I'm getting ready for the SF-Biarritz game tonight at 9. I'm sure I'll have plenty to add to the SF Page!! Concerning your query, what exactly do you think should be added to the page? I think it's already pretty full. As for the images, I'll see what I can do within the limits of copyright. OK. Talk to U later!! Beru91 18:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, watch the Currie Cup, it starts about now of Fox Sports 2!--HamedogTalk|@ 14:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

How cool was that plane going over the stadium?--HamedogTalk|@ 15:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] All Blacks

Even though NA4 may be our featured article, I have decided to get to work on the All Blacks article and I am going to attempt to bring it up to GA status. If you want to help, fell free too.--HamedogTalk|@ 12:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Taking a while!--HamedogTalk|@ 06:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I, do you want to help or something?--HamedogTalk|@ 08:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] French competitions

Hi! I'm sure you'll be glad to learn that I added three pages to rhe rugby project : Coupe de France (rugby union), Challenge Yves du Manoir and Coupe de l'Espérance. Please do review them and correct the English (I may teach your darn language, I ain't no native!). Also let me know what I can do to improve them or other pages for that matter. I didn't go to the Stade-Biarritz game, I watched it at home, or rather I tried to because a surprise guest (a gastorentiritis) made me rush to the toilet the second Damien Traille kicked off! Sorry for the details! Tough night despite the win. And Shawn Sowerby broke his leg... Cheers! Beru91 13:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My pleasure

Hey mate! The pages were a pleasure to make. Glad you enjoyed them. All I need is a little time and that's not always the easiest part... Sometimes it's just "hey, let's make one!" (or improve one for that matter as with Toulon). As long as I'm up to the standards of the English WP, that's all right because it's not always the case on the French WP. BTW, what are your criteria to create a club page? Does it need to have a "past" at the national level eg? We're wrestling with this at the moment, because some want to delete pages for 5th division clubs with one season at the maximum level, at a time when the first division included 80 clubs (unbelievable, I know), while others want to keep them. As for the records (most points, tries etc.) this is not readily available information, simply because nobody really keeps track. I know it's traditional to have those for you guys, but not over here. I'll see what I can do on a piecemeal basis. Also it might be for the modern age only. Today I added a page on a romantic figure of French rugby, Yves du Manoir. Hope you like it! Anyway, cheers! Beru91 16:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC) PS: I had no idea you were Australian! :¬D

[edit] RfA

Just so you know I am up for WP:RfA--HamedogTalk|@ 11:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A proposal you may be interested in

Leave your opinion on this[1] matter if you are interested. It is basically about the term rugby super league being used as a disambiguation for all rugby competitions by that or a similar name. --Ehinger222 12:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saints

Thanks for your help on this - I'm hoping to contribute quite a bit, but might come to you for some help/advice seeing how you've so kindly volunteered..... --Brecker 20:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SF Rivalries

Hi! There's definitely a paragraph to be made. In the early period, it used to be Racing Club de France, now it's both Toulouse and Biarritz, although none has the intensity and history of the Reds/Waratahs confrontations. I'll try to figure something out and let you now. BTW my question about the French clubs was actually for us at the French WP! I don't think it's necessary to clog the English WP with French Third or Fourth division clubs, unless they really mattered in the past. But I got your point. And thanks for the compliments, they're always nice to read... Cheers!

Hey there! No, I don't think I'll go to any of the games (family obligations), but I'll be watching. Tana did great today, scoring a try for his debut with Toulon. I added that on his page. I'll definitely look at your history sections. Please ask if ther's anything I can do or check, that'll be a pleasure. French clubs did well in the H Cup this weekend, while the Poms got beat big time, and my other club, AS Béziers, won in the Pro D2, a good weekend overall! Cheers! Beru91 22:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RU Assessment

Hey, I've changed Waratah's to Top importance rather then High as per the importance standards listed on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union/Assessment page. - Shudda talk 22:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adam R. Jones to Adam Jones (rugby player)

Please use the move function, instead of copy-and-paste, when renaming a page. This avoids splitting the page history in several places. Thanks. --Geniac 15:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, that makes sense. It looked a lot like a typical cut-paste move, that's all. Thanks for explaining. --Geniac 13:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rugby pics

Thanks for the tip. I'm working on a new version of the collage, with a rugby union pic. Grant65 | Talk 14:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] All Blacks Peer review

I've submitted All Blacks article for a peer-review, please go to WP:PR and leave comments if people suggest improvements. This is important if we want to get this article to FA status. Thanks - Shudda talk 02:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:CIV

Please do not accuse editors in good standing of vandalism. Wikipedia has a very specific definition of what vandalism is, and what it is not. Chris cheese whine 11:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leaving Wikipedia

Thought I should tell you that, at least for the moment, I am leaving Wikipedia do to the Virgin Unite adverts at the top of the page.~You are a great editor.--HamedogTalk|@ 02:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] All Blacks lead section

Hey, I've been working on the All Blacks article and have done the lead again as per your suggestions. I'd really like you to have a look over it, I know you are on a wiki-break but hopefully you can have a look as soon as you are back. I havn't added references to the lead yet, they are all in the main article anyhow. Language may need some work also, but I'm hoping the content is acceptable. Also, I've created the template {{WPRU Announcements}} for peoples user pages, you should take a look. - Shudda talk 04:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the Barnstar, although I won't be celebrating until All Blacks gets FA. It's so close, so I'd appreciate any help fixing little things people are unhappy about. It seems prose is the only issue at the moment, unfortunately it's almost certainly my weakest area. After the All Blacks FAC is done I'll have a look over the World Cup article. We don't want it losing it's FA status. You may want to submit it to the Wikipedia League of Copy-Editors. Also, thanks for looking at WPRU Peer review dept; your input is greatly appreciated. We should be encouraging people to participate in the peer-review process as much as possible. Thanks again! - Shudda talk 02:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Great Work

The Running Man Barnstar
I, Bob, award you this long overdue token of appreciation for your excellent work in all things Rugby related. Excellent work. Bob 07:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fiji Rugby

Hi I was interested in asking you if you would like to be part of a project WP:RUFR, started by me but revamped with the help of Shudda. Its basically a workgroup regarding Fiji Rugby and it would be a great pleasure 2 have you Abroad.Just click on the above link and sign up..Thanx..ø~Cometstyles~ø(talk)

[edit] Crusaders peer review

Hi, I've requested a peer review for Crusaders. Could everyone please take a look and help out? I'm trying to get the article up to Featured Article standard, and would like any feedback I can get. You can add any comments here. Thanks a lot! - Shudda talk 03:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] French rugby team

Hi, following your request here is the translation of the part on colours/uniform in the French version. Check and adapt at your will Dingy 08:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ESB

Not sure how interested you are in copyediting. But I'm desperate for people to copyedit The Empire Strikes Back. If you could look it over, I'd really appreciate it. The Filmaker 16:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

    • Okay, I feel that the article is ready for FAC. However I've been wrong about prose before. Please feel free to copyedit as much as you see within the article, even while it is in it's FAC. The Filmaker 08:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
      • There is a hidden section inside the article right now dealing with video games, I was wondering if you could copyedit while I'm sourcing it. :) The Filmaker 15:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Australian Rugby Championship

I knew creating a page for the Tornadoes and the Aces would make you come out of the tall grass. :-) Saebhiar Adishatz 16:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking, instead of the Franchise area title we could use Feeder clubs, that's the title they use on Rugby league pages. Just to be consistent. Franchise area sounds weird, I didn't know how to call it so I called it that but in retrospect feeder clubs feels more natural. Saebhiar Adishatz 16:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
No sweat you deserve it (although it is worthless). Nice work on the Sydney Fleet page. Man you're fast! Saebhiar Adishatz 14:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maps

Hey, I don't mind doing the map at all. I have been trying to find more info on the exact geography of the teams. The best info I found was at rugby.com.au. I was wondering if I could email you? Could you enable emails from other users for 24 hours (I'll then do it via pop-ups). Because I have quite a few questions, and could email you the map, as I progress? - Shudda talk 22:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rugby union at the Summer Olympics

Hey, I was just having a read through Rugby union at the Summer Olympics (which I see you mostly wrote). It's been submitted for FAC, and a peer-review. I think the article certainly has the workings of an FA class article, just needs to be expanded, prob referenced a little more, and a copy-edit. Do you think it's worth submitting for a peer-review (and advertising it well, to get some decent feedback) then trying to get this thing to FA standard? It's a fascinating topic and I think it would be worth it. - Shudda talk 02:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

If you put it up for peer-review here and then also place it at the main peer-review here then I'll definitely give some suggestions. Also, post some messages around advertising the peer review. I think the article may need some expansion as well, rather then just a clean up and the addition of some references. I'm willing to help though. - Shudda talk 04:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey you should get that going. I'm going to have a look at that pick on the ABs page soon as well. - Shudda talk 22:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah hopefully, just post some messages at various articles asking for people to look at it. As well, I'd maybe ask a few people who would be interested. Also, isn't there an Olympics Project that could be involved? - Shudda talk 20:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry lads, didn't mean to eavesdrop but I reckon Shudda is right. The article is not far off FA standards. You should go for it Cvene. Saebhiar Adishatz 09:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive

For the 2007 Rugby World Cup WikiProject Rugby union is launching an Improvement Drive for national rugby union teams; specifically those participating in the Rugby World Cup.

We need your help! Here is what you can do:

  • Adopt a national rugby union team article and collaborate with other members to improve it.
  • Find, create and upload free images that will help improve these articles.
  • Copy-edit, reference, and expand articles when and where you can.
  • Promote the project and encourage others to join.

The World Cup is fast approaching and these articles are going to get a lot more hits during the tournament. It would be great if we could have them at a high standard!

For more information see the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby union talk page here.

Shudde talk 05:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] All Blacks versus France at rugby union

This article is now a Good Article and I've put it up for peer review. I would like to nominate it for Featured Article some time in the next few weeks, and would appreciate any feedback. Please have a look then comment on the peer-review page! Thanks. - Shudde talk 03:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jonah Lomu

Hey, I've been working on this a while. Some of the GA criteria have got a lot stricter and to prevent this going to WP:GAR I've been copy-editing and adding references. Was wondering if you could help with this. Thought you may want to help as you nominated it for GA. - Shudde talk 03:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] All Blacks versus France at rugby union

Hey, I was wondering if you could add your comments to the peer review of this article here? I'm going to take it to FAC once the review is done so am looking to wrap it up. Thanks. PS what'd ya think of the game? Pretty dull huh? - Shudde talk 22:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 01:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Highlanders (rugby) peer review

Hey. I've been struggling to get any comments at my requested peer-review of Highlanders (rugby). I was wondering if you would be able to spend a few minutes reading through the article and adding any comments or suggestions here? Thanks. - Shudde talk 06:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Val_kilmer_kiss_bang.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Val_kilmer_kiss_bang.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Raincoat part 2 Kramer Morty Seinfeld.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:The Raincoat part 2 Kramer Morty Seinfeld.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Challnge Cup logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Challnge Cup logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crocodile hunter collision course.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crocodile hunter collision course.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heineken Cup 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Heineken Cup 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:VforVendettaCharacter

A tag has been placed on Template:VforVendettaCharacter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:AMNRL Championship

A tag has been placed on Template:AMNRL Championship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] tİGER

shark caught in bay jpg in Türkish vikipedia Big shark.jpg. Why?-Yakamaka —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.101.56.110 (talk) 16:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Firstborn film.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Firstborn film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edinburgh Rugby Peer Review

Hi there, I was wondering if you could take a look at the Edinburgh Rugby article for peer review when you get the chance. I've decided to try and improve it, I've added some recent history and referencing but I'm fairly new to the whole editing process and was wondering if you could give me some pointers on what the most important issues are to correct. Cheers! PeemJim86 (talk · contribs)

PeemJim86 (talk) 22:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Australia.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Australia.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Alligator sewer.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Alligator sewer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 00:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)