User talk:Carados/Archive Jan 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Speedy Delete of Artemis Fowl (film)

i assume i am replying to you correctly by editing this page... so if i was sourcing a webpage that has done interviews with the author of the book/movie would i just put a link somewhere in the article to those interviews then? I did go ahead and read that link you gave me for movies and i don't see there is enough information out there to really put and article up for this movie so I am asking really for future reference. When you source something do you just blatantly put the url you're sourcing from on the page? LOl i thought this would just be fun helping to update and add to the collective of information but heck, its a whole new world in here with a whole new language haha. I have a whole new respect now for wikipedia --Bannostookaylo (talk) 06:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Delete of Artemis Fowl (film)

wow i am incredibly new to this and i am so sorry if i am doing things very wrong. I was just wanting to find information on the Artemis Fowl movie and found information on it and thought it should be on wikipedia too. I believe if i read things right you deleted it because of "Non notable film"? I am at a loss as to what exactly that means... is there anything i can do to get some information up about the upcoming film? Thanks for your time. --Bannostookaylo (talk) 06:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy Delete of HERBIEMANIA

So, do I need to construct the page over again? Should I just cite the sources or do I need to list the articles in their entirety? How does one use this talk system properly? I have no cluse and can't find help via a search on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dubindahouse (talk • contribs) 12:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Speedy Delete of Beecontent's recent entries

Carados and Admin of Wikipedia: please note that I am new to posting on Wikipedia and I am not trying to vandalise it. Please forgive me if my recent entries were 'inappropriate' but I really believe that they are appropriate for Wikipedia. Can we at least talk about it?

Thank you. Beecontent (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC) Beecontent

I'm new at using this so forgive me if I am doing it wrong. Herbiemania.com has been written about in various magazines. What information is needed beyond that for the article to stay online?


[edit] Speedy Delete of iBuilt.net

I took great care to remove all commerical aspects of this entry. How was it any different that that for Cabanova, Moonfruit, or Eversoft 1st Page?

Thanks Egoober (talk) 00:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Delete of Joseph Bustos

Any help you can offer is much appriciated. The individual is a noted microsoft evanglist and I thaught I provided enough references. Please help preserve?

Thanks, UG --Usc.ultrageek (talk) 23:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


Hello Carados. Question about my Reese Fox article: if my page is deleted, will I be able to start it again when I have more information and material?
Thanks, Littleredbox 20:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Guennol Lioness speedy declined

Hi, I declined the speedy deletion on this. It was not unsalvageably incoherent-- just a little bent. I made it sensible and added a source. Also, 5,000 year old Elamite statues that sell for $52,000,000 are inherently notable. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 03:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

It was more than a fragment when I was done, and Tijuana Brass still deleted it. Too tired. I'll try to bring it back tomorrow. Arg. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 03:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] El guapo Diego Garcia

Was that the one about the DOG? Woof! Dlohcierekim 03:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The article about that one ride in Florida... the movie one... you know...

No prob. Thanks for tracking it down for me, I appreciate it. ...hey, look, I'm already on your talk page! Hmm, this isn't reflecting well on me. Tijuana Brass (talk) 04:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Super Stupid Stuff Show

It's back. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 22:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help me

{{helpme}} The article on Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival seems to be screwed up, and I would like to fix it, to prevent something like http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coachella_Valley_Music_and_Arts_Festival&oldid=176274487 happening again.

Also, how do I link to a revision?

Thank you in advance.

How is the article screwed up? All I can see seriously wrong is the duplicate references section, which I have removed. The only problem with the edit you undid was the unclosed <ref> tag (it needs a </ref> at the end), which led to the whole article after that point being treated as a reference (and thus appearing in both reference sections). I'm not aware of any way of linking to a revision except with the url, as you have done. Algebraist 05:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Labour India Publications

Thanks for your comment. please check here, is it properly listed, could you please cross check?--Avinesh Jose (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Resolved.

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. This is especially important when tagging pages for speedy deletion. Pumpmeup 01:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fire Island

The song is a 30 year old disco classic.  Mister ricochet (talk) 02:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carados

Going for admin are you? Hope you get the mop! Patrol those recent changes! Not Ed Gauthier (talk) 02:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

AGF! AGF! AGF! Not Ed Gauthier (talk) 03:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carados

My friend,

can you observe my page [Http://en.wikipedia.org/daniel_jordan_argo here] and tell me what I must do to keep it from speedy deletion?

Thank you,

Cashbucketshuck (talk) 03:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carados

Thank you my friend,

could you please keep it from being deleted until I can do so.

Probably around 10 Minutes or less

]

thank you.

Cashbucketshuck (talk) 03:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I believe this should do the trick.

WP:BAND states

" 11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network. "

please view the new Level 2 heading labeled 'Gaining Mainstream Popularity' it is the first level 2 heading I believe.

ah you may need this again...

Link


Thank you Carados.

Please Respond Soon.


Cashbucketshuck (talk) 03:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Philadelphia Slick

I see you removed the Speedy Deletion tags. Thank you. I made some changes and was about to ask you to look over it, but I guess you beat me to it. JesseRafe (talk) 05:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] speedy

DB-nn, speedy criterion A7 does not apply to conferences. it applies only to the things listed in WP:CSD A7. Furthermore, any conference asserting an attendance of 10,00 people would be at least as assertion of notability. If you think the notability of Metamorphosis Empowerment Conference dubious, and you may well be right, the way to go is WP:AFD. DGG (talk) 08:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lavamus.com deletion

Hi,

I noticed the page Lavamus.com is attempting to be deleted. I think this page should stay, because new information is released daily, and also the references are listed. I realize it doesn't fully comply with quality standards, but I believe it should stay.

I have noticed your other deletions, and agree with them, but I believe this article should stay.

Thanks. --PLGG1 (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Unitrin Inc

Hey, I left some reasoning on why the article should not be deleted on the Talk:Unitrin Inc page. I don't exactly know why you think it is Blatant Advertising, but as I am new to editing wikipedia you could enlighten me. What really shocks me is that there were no articles pertaining to Unitrin Inc; it needs an article. I would gladly re-write it if you would tell me what I did wrong this time. (Chasecarter (talk) 01:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Ballet Fantastique

Hi, Could you look over the page Ballet Fantastique. It was removed by wiki admin because it had advertising, so I rewrote some of it and got it back up. Also, I was in such a hurry to get the new page up that I forgot to capitalize the whole title. Could you tell me how I could get a letter in the title changed please. You put a note on it saying it would be removed because it may be irrelevant, but I am building more references. I have a bunch of new resources and information to put up, but I want to be sure it is ok so far. You could leave a note on my page. Thank you, Christy

--Smooshette (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] notability

notability can be a difficult thing to produce, Newsprint seems the most direct, and not accesible to all experiences and activities. Only the most priviledged, the greatest, and the most notorious will be found in print. I'm not really sure what else constitutes notability, mention on someone's webpage? In the 36plus months the Permaculture group has existed it has had some 150 members, and a larger looser group of allies. Has contributed substantial work to the Alameda Point Collaborative, Tinkers Workshop, Peoples Park, and the longest urban treesit(UC Berkeley Memorial Oak Grove Treesit). Has Contributed real work hours (for several months each) to the Prison Literature Project, the Ashby Garden, East Bay Food Not Bombs, Berkeley Copwatch,the Peoples Groceries 55th St Garden, the Green Fairie Farm, the BYA(berkeley youth alternatives), The Plant(community garden and attempted ecovillage)/ , Berkeleys Green City Gallery and many other projects. What direction can you give, the only direction I have is a simple dismissal.

Moped45 (talk) 02:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revision to Giant Oil and Gas Fields

Carados, you were right with your flag on Giant Oil and Gas Fields. I've rewritten it (i was the original author yesterday) in what I hope is a more encyclopedic style addressing the synthesis flag. ArglebargleIV flagged two sections for copypaste, rightly, and those have been addressed with a complete rewrite--original writing, reporting on the sources. Please have a look and let me know if your tag can come off. I'm separately writing ArgleBargleIV. --Austinbirdman (talk) 17:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD rationale

Hey Carados. I have closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einar Torfi Einarsson but I just wanted to mention that WP:VANITY is deprecated as a link (it is a soft redirect to WP:COI because of its pejorative name), and in any event, mentioning conflicts of interest can serve to bolster other arguments, but has no teeth and little deletion traction. It's much better to cite to some accepted standard for article inclusion, such as WP:N, WP:V and WP:NOT in deletion debates. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Deletion

I see no reason why RC Bad Reichenhall should be deleted. It is a sports club and not a group or person as your message suggested. The page may be bare at the moment but that is because it is a rather new club. In 2008, when the club gets going into the domestic competition (as I said in the article) then there will be much more to say including Season, History, Colours, Results etc. I am also hoping to direct people to the page who might have some more information which can be added. As I've done with other rugby league clubs (see West Wales Sharks and Bridgend Blue Bulls). Please leave the page as it is for at least 7 days so that I can try to expand it. Poiuytre (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please be somewhat cautious with speedy deletions

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.

I noticed you requested many speedy deletions, and many of them get overturned by established editors. In a similar discussion, User:DGG recommended "You should aim at at least 90%--and more like 98%" for the proportion of articles that actually need to be speedied. — Sebastian 23:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

In a similar conversation with another editor, I realized that I may have been a bit harsh in not assuming AGF. I could tell you a bit more about that, if you're interested. — Sebastian 05:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)    (I stopped watching this page. If you would like to continue the talk, please do so here and let me know.)

[edit] My attack page

Thanks for alerting me to this; it was fun to read. It's a pity that I've resolved not to feed the trolls, or I'd have thanked its creator -- well, perhaps not, since I believe that "You can tell the quality of a man by the quality of his enemies," and this one just doesn't measure up. Darn it, I deserve more literate enemies!!! But thanks for pointing it out, I'd have missed it completely. Cheers, Accounting4Taste:talk 19:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

The user in question went further than what you saw and another admin blocked him permanently. So, thanks again for bringing it to my attention. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Celtic FC Official Anthem prod

Since that's actually not the right song -- it's an attack page against Celtic -- do you have a problem if I replace your prod tag on that article with a {{db-attack}} tag? Thanks. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 16:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Earth Force tag

A work in progress please be patient--Tomtom9041 (talk) 17:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy tag

What template did you use to make this edit? The code is broken and causes problems for section editing. —Random832 15:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

nevermind, found it {{web-warn}}. —Random832 15:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Bond Wireless

Hi Carados, I'm assuming why this page has been tagged is due to the fact that it has product information on the compay. If this information were to be removed, would this satisy you? If not, please let me know what suggestions you have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sms guru (talk • contribs) 03:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Bond Wireless

Hi Carados, thanks for the quick reply. The page was not created to be part of an advertising campaign and I'm happy to remove the product information if this would resolve whatever problems you see with the page. If there issues other than the product information being displayed, please let me know so that these can be addressed as well. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sms guru (talk • contribs) 04:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Iperf

Hi Carados - i added this page as Iperf is one of the standard tools available. There is already an existing stub article on Ttcp - another common tool which had a blank link to an article on Iperf - and an article on bandwidth testing - which referred to tools without providing any examples. So i added an article on iperf to line up with the existing content. If the article is not in line with guidance perhaps the this one and the ttcp page content should be merged onto the Bandwidth testing page if you feel that each article is not stand alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davepark (talk • contribs) 04:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Questions on notability of The Defectors

You have implied that the page is not notable. I am not directly saying you're wrong, but I have written out a little bit on the article's talk page, and if possible I'd like your response there. Thanks.

PeteShanosky 02:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] about your bot

Your bot seems to have something wrong with it - it tagged an article as copyvio without listing the URL of the source. ‎Dr. James B. Aguayo-Martel - Cbdorsett (talk) 05:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] At least some of you guys are cool cats

Thanks for removin your tag.I AM JOHN SMITH (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Brian John Converse

We've already speedily deleted this one once a few hours ago. I dropped a message by the contributor asking if he would post a justification but got no reply. I listed on AfD, but I'm more than happy to leave your speedy deletion tag as well. Just wanted to let you know what was going on. SaveThePoint (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About a new article

I added an external link with information related to my new article about "Tito Etcheverry", please let me know if that is enough. Thank you. Superman3892 (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dark Heresy (band)

Hi there, you just tagged an article I began to write, Dark Heresy (band), for deletion, before I could even write anything. How do I avoid this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark Heretic (talk • contribs) 23:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Deletion of OG 2.0

This appears to be a power trip.

It is not doing any harm, not advertising anything, and speaks of a group which has given a lot of people pleasure over the last year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankwarren (talk • contribs) 23:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] OG 2.0

"remember that they probably believe that they are helping the project."

By destroying peoples' enthusiasm to contribute.

Had you given us a little while to change it and add to the article, it would have been a rather marvellous article. Instead, the jobsworth has to spoil things.

Thank you very much, sunshine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankwarren (talk • contribs) 00:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hobbits and Wizards.com

Hey, its me :( I am the creator of the site and thus entitled to COI (conflict of interest) (I did my homework :) ) So I am not being rude and just want to know what it would take to get my website on wiki

                                                                    -HawCreator  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HaWCreator (talk • contribs) 03:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hobbits and Wizards.com

Me again :) , just wondering since I do not have any sources if I get ___ # of visitors, and sell ___# of products, and get ___ # of rewards, and have ___# of pages my site will be on wiki ( can you fill in the blanks for me :) Also do you live in England or something because if you are as crazy as me staying up this late you kinda like me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HaWCreator (talk • contribs) 04:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC) HELLO BUDDY PATROOPER WHERE DID YOU GO :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HaWCreator (talk • contribs) 04:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Believe me I would never get my site / blog on that! Sorry if I am distracting you, I am just kind of bored. Feel free to keep typing back!

                                                           :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HaWCreator (talk • contribs) 04:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey Where did you go?

                       --HaWCreator (talk) 04:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC) (I signed bot guy :p  )

--HaWCreator (talk) 04:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC) You must have gone to sleep last night because you were tired :) I just wanted to say hi!

      -HaW creator  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ME

[edit] Me

Just saying that now i am creator of HaW —Preceding unsigned comment added by Creator of HaW (talk • contribs) 14:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Deletion of ProjectExplorer

Questioning the speedy deletion of the recently added ProjectExplorer article. The item had several external sources and references in major publications, and was notable in the description of the site itself, its educational approach, and the notable people working with the organization (including many subjects listed on Wikipedia.)

If there were particular stylistic changes that set off a "SPAM" radar, I'd be happy to address, but Speedy Deletion due to "blatant advertising" seems harsh. Please let me know what I can do to address.

All the best! Edwardcampbell (talk) 00:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not give speedy deletion warnings to fellow patrollers. This is the third one I have to delete from my talk page today. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 02:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mastek

You may want to withdraw the {{db}}, because take a look at this. It's sorta notable. —BoL 04:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Delete of "Wizards" spells

Hi. I created that page because the spells are occupying to much space on the "Wizards" page, and there are cleary more than 10, so it deserved a new page. That's why I made the page. Just thought I was helping out Wikipedia. If it deserves to be deleted (which it doesn't), then by all means delete it.Empezardesdecero1718 (talk) 05:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject New page

It is an announcement to new page patrollers that WikiProject New page have started. Take some time looking at it. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 05:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dark Data

Hello Carrados, I was trying to add a reference to an article I was hoping to create - I haven't gotten it right yet and was warned of a speedy deletion potential due to I'm not sure what. Joseane (talk) 06:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gilles Therien

  • Uh, yes. The French paragraph is about the film, not the filmmaker. The part of the article that is actually about the guy constitutes two sentences and can be speedied under the db-empty criteria. JuJube (talk) 22:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Aras Sar Iussan

An editor has nominated Aras Sar Iussan, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aras Sar Iussan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Deletion of Ferozdin Qaderbuksh

The article i am currently working on Ferozdin Qaderbuksh is not a mamorial as you stated, but an article about one of the few royal decendents in pakistan. I intended to add more information on the person soon. I did a historical biography on the person in my writtings class in college I will finish the article as soon as i get a chance there will be historic significance to the creation of pakistan as well as royal housholds of india. please give me a chance to finsh at. Thank You and have a great day —Preceding unsigned comment added by Safirbabar (talk • contribs) 06:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Aimee knight

An editor has nominated Aimee knight, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee knight and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nominal group (language)

Hi, thanks for your review of this new article — give me a chance to work on this stub. Your citation tag seems inappropriate: did you observe the three specific citations within the text. They're not yet formatted into superscript numbers, but specific citations they are, all the same. Tony (talk) 07:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Prod tag on Misery (Band)

Why don't you just tag it for speedy? ~EnviroboyTalkContribs - 07:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Two Loons for Tea entry status

Carados,

I have now read the Wikipedia Business_FAQ and Wikipedia:BAND pages and acknowledge the CoI issue (However, I trust the entry's language was eminently objective and a purely factual minimal foundation for others to build upon). Also, the submission was made to provide context for existing mentions of the artist in other Wikipedia entries (Happy Rhodes, Sarathan Records, Eric Rosse, etc.), and that other Wikipedia entries ([[e.g., Matt Chamberlain, Skerik etc.) could, with reason, be meaningfully supplemented with reference to this artist, per below.

W/r/t "notability" criteria in Wikipedia:BAND, I will note that the submission merits inclusion in Wikipedia in regards to six of the criteria therein:

Q: has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.[1]

A: Yes. Scores of published reviews in regional and national periodicals including All Music Guide, Amplifier, Big Takeover, Relix, Seattle Sound, Yahoo! Music, etc.

Q: Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country, reported in reliable sources.[3]

A. Yes, US & Europe, and links to published sources available online (ranging from LA Weekly to newspapers in Lisbon, Portugal).

Q: Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).

A: Yes. Three full-length records released on Sarathan Records (founded in 2000) which has releases by notable artists including Abra Moore, [[Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players]], and Airpushers (two members of Black Eyed Peas band).

Q: Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.

A: Yes. Band members for recordings and/or live shows have included Matt Chamberlain, Skerik, Pat Mastelotto, Trey Gunn, Brian Lacleod and many others, and recordings produced by Eric Rosse.

Q: Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.

A: Yes: XM Radio, and extensive play of bumpers on NPR's "All Things Considered". Also, latest single, "Monkey", charted #20 on FMQB AAA Charts in 2007 (not sure if this qualifies as "national rotation on major radio network", as the AAA stations are not "properly" a "network" like Clear Channel).

Q: Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network.

A: Yes. Two > 30 min shows recorded at XM radio HQ in 2003 and 2007 have been broadcast multiple times, most recently on the Starbucks Cafe channel.

I'll leave it up to you Wikipedians involved in this discussion as to how this entry should be handled. If you feel it is appropriate for me to include relevant information from above into the article per Wikipedia guidelines, I will gladly do so!

Very graciously,

Jonathan Kochmer SarathanRecords (talk) 09:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Reading the policies is good. It sounds like you may be in a position to add references to the Two loons for tea article. I would encourage you to do that, because what's there now is not enough to justify an article. I don't think Sarathan Records counts as a major label, so having records issued there doesn't meet WP:BAND, though it's in the right direction. But please provide specifics of the non-trivial published works about the group. EdJohnston (talk) 01:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Two Loons for Tea entry status

Thanks, Ed. With Wikiwatcher approval now, I shall go ahead and add some more purely factual information for the candidate Two Loons for Tea article that demonstrate notability. I understand your point about Sarathan Records not being a "major" -- but there are five other criteria from WP:BAND that the artist fulfills...

I'll just make sure to document above appropriately, and let the wiki winds blow where they may from there on out...

One dumb & niggly little mechanical question: the headline for the article is "Two loons for tea" instead of "Two Loons for Tea"... how do I edit the article headline? I wouldn't care terribly, but it seems (possibly?) that case sensitivity is resulting in this candidate article not being actively linked from other approved WikiPedia articles in which the artist is already mentioned. Or perhaps this is due to the transient limbo/purgatory status of the article?

Thanks so much (from a wikinewbi! :) SarathanRecords (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC) SarathanRecords

I renamed the article to Two Loons for Tea, per your request. There is still a redirect from the old name, in case not all the references get updated. EdJohnston (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Krawiec

Hi I'm afraid I took your speedy deletion message too personally last nite. I ended up logging off, I was too upset to focus. I realize you are doing an important job, and I'm not completely sure Krawiec satisfies notability anyway, much as I like him.(Time will tell, as will hopefully other more knowledgeable editors here, if I'm lucky enough that they contribute to the article.) But what I'm actually here is to let you know that you may be quite unintentionally and very slightly too abrupt in your notifications to article creators.. You are certainly very civil, but a little softening might help. Whether or not you agree, thanks for doing an important job!Rich (talk) 00:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Userpage

Would you like me to semi-protect your userpage? You're getting a ton of vandalism.   jj137 ♠ 03:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)