Talk:Bite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Medicine This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
Start This page has been rated as start-Class on the quality assessment scale
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance assessment scale
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Contents

[edit] Vandalisim:

i have discovered this text at the bottom of the page: MITCH GOT RAPED BY DONKEY COCKS it was probably a new user. if anymore vandalisim is seen, please place a tag thanks YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah 05:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC) kk, i saw some more vandalisim in the edit history and theres about 3 instances! YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah 05:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] picture?

Is such an eh, *cough* gay *cough* picture required? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.70.123.180 (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC).

I agree. I'm going to delete it right now.
Apparently someone put the picture back. I know wikipedia should not be censored from disturbing pictures in general, but in this case it's absolutely unnecessary and doesn't help the reader understand what a bite is. It appears as if a bite means "sadism by many naked men in hell". For those reasons, I'm removing it again. SuperMidget (talk) 12:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scorpions?

Why are scorpions mentioned in an article dedicated to biting? A scorpion injects toxins via its stinger rather than through its bite. Wouldn't that merit relocation to an article on stings?

[edit] Inappropriate Example

The statement, "This could happen if a female bites too hard during oral sex," is inappropriate for a number of reasons: The other bullets in that section do not give examples (good, bad, or indifferent). Doing so in this case lacks parallelism and is poor style. The statement is missing a period at the end. The statement blithely introduces a "female" without explanation or preface although many forms of oral sex do not involve a woman. Finally, the sexual nature of the comment is unwarranted and unrelated to the scope of the article. 74.140.112.243 02:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)RedFez

what's innapropriate is that picture

Yeah thats true

[edit] Sexual nature of biting

I'd like to see Wikipedia cover the sexual nature of biting a bit better. The current page seems scoped to biting as an animal defensive behavior, and as a part of early childhood. But there is much more to biting. I'm dumping this on the talk page to give controversy a bit of time to settle before putting it on the article page.

Here are some tables from Gebhard, Paul H.; Alan B. Johnson (1979). The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.  They sort of go along with the data at Kinsey Reports#Biting but really it seems to make more sense that they go in the Biting page rather than the Kinsey page, since the latter should not be an attempt to reproduce all data from those reports.


Table 216 Frequency of Respondent Biting in Sexual Activity
Male Female
White Black White Black
Frequency College Non-college College College Non-College College
Never 65.5 73.1 71.9 67.1 74.9
Rarely 16.1 10.1 13.6 9.4 9.7 5.5
Occasionally 9.7 7.5 14.2 9.3 11.8 7.8
Often 8.2 8.2 4.5 8.7 10.4 11.0
Never now, formerly did 0.4 1.1 0 0.7 0.9 0.9
Rarely now, formerly more 0 0.6 0 0 0
Occasionally now formerly often 0 0 0 0 0 0

Standard Question: "Do you gently bite or nibble your partner during petting or intercourse?" If affirmative reply: "often, occasionally, or rarely?"

JTMresearch 16:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Table 217 Frequency of and Response to Being Bitten in Sexual Activity
Male Female
White Black White Black
Frequency College Non-college College College Non-College College
Never 55.8 62.6 33.1 59.2 56.0 51.8
Rarely 19.6 12.8 22.8 15.9 15.1 19.4
Occsaionally 13.7 10.3 34.3 14.8 18.7 16.7
Often 10.9 14.4 9.7 10.0 10.1 12.2
Of those bitten rarely, % aroused by it 35.0 37.0 20.0 38.8 40.1 20.1
Of those bitten occsaionally, % aroused by it 62.3 63.8 40.0 57.9 64.9 59.4
Of those bitten often, %aroused by it 58.8 54.2 35.0 68.5 69.6 55.5

Standard Question: "Does your partner bite you?" If affirmative reply: "often, occasionally or rarely?" and "Does it arouse you sexually?"

JTMresearch (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bite (Car Mechanics)

im looking for car terms for my concepts of technology class.. I searched for bite and it gave me a wound.. can you help me out by sending me a car term please.. email address is hardcoreemu23@aol.com

I've heard of people getting run down by cars, but I've never heard of anyone getting bitten by one. What part of a car is its bite? Smerdis of Tlön 17:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] References needed

"In Eastern European folklore, ..." This quote seems a little NPOV to me. Please provide references.

[edit] Biting mechanic?

Strangely the article does not contain anything about mechanic of a bite and how is it performed. Needed more info about the act of biting rather than wound. I mean, it's also a verb, not just the noun. 213.7.110.237 (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)zondartul

[edit] Let me also say something

I must say something! Here is the thing: I hate the fact that people bite each other as part of sexual petting. Doing such a thing to each other to show affection is wrong.--User:Fangusu(User_talk:Fangusu) 13:13,6 June 2008 (UTC)

This is your personal opinion. You have every right to have this opinion, but you cannot keep removing the information about it because you don't like it. Wikipedia is for accurate, verifiable information. Regardless of your personal opinion, this information is both accurate and verifiable, and changing something true to something untrue is vandalism. Do not remove this or any other accurate, verifiable, notable information in the future, from this or any other article, unless there is a consensus among the other editors who have discussed it. --Icarus (Hi!) 08:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)