Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second right brother

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete; I have (as suggested) added a sentence on this subject to 2008 Summer Olympics torch relay#Torch Security. Waggers (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Second right brother

Second right brother (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable internet meme Relata refero (disp.) 14:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete: Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:N an nn incident. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 15:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable person. Article deals more with torch ceremony than subject. Tnxman307 (talk) 15:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - He is notable where the olympics is taking place. Benjwong (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails several things, most notably WP:N for notability. Gary King (talk) 17:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - important to document the insanity of Chinese nationalism Novidmarana (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. The article suggests that almost no significant information is available about this person, the "Foreign perception" section is really about the security team collectively, and of the two sources actually about the man one is a blog post. At most, the Internet meme warrants a single sentence at 2008 Summer Olympics torch relay#Torch Security. EALacey (talk) 21:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment, I think it is interesting, but lacks sources. I like EALacey's idea to mention him in 2008 Summer Olympics torch relay#Torch Security. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 22:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Clearly fails WP:N. Yunfeng (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Per above. John Smith's (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 21:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep A source has been found: He is the main topic of this The Age article. Which came out today, I think. Does this change anybody's opinion? Phlegm Rooster (talk) 10:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.