Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Hearts Glossary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a repost. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 19:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kingdom Hearts Glossary

Kingdom Hearts Glossary (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Wikipedia is not a game guide. ßottesiηi ^(talk) 00:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. Deathawk 01:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Original research, fancruft, Wikipedia is not: a videogame guide, a dictionary, an indiscriminate collection of information. -- IslaySolomon | talk 02:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. This isn't game-guide stuff, it's just defining some terms that the reader might not know. If we had more KH pages link here, it might get better. ~ PHDrillSergeant...and his couch...§ 02:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a game guide. This would be better off in a gaming wiki. --Wafulz 03:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 03:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, WP is not a game guide. TJ Spyke 04:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, with the suggestion to User:Xer to start a web page with this information - this is better suited to a web page. --Dennisthe2 05:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Vote changed, see below --Dennisthe2 07:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is not a game guide (just because it's a page that's not on the main page of a game, does not make it a game guide). However, Wikipedia is not a dictionary either and the page can't avoid being a bunch of dictionary definitions with no sources. ColourBurst 07:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and WP:NOT. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 07:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NOT, fancruft. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 07:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not a game guide SkierRMH 09:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, indiscriminate collection of information. Garrett^Talk 09:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge It does not need it's own page. scope_creep 15:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:OR, WP:RS, WP:NOT (game guide, collection of cruft, dictionary), and has nothing in the article that couldn't simply be merged in (and not much of that). --Elaragirl ||||||^Talk|Count 16:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Recreation. I can assure you that some entries are complete bullshit, such as "Corridoors of Light" and "Chasers". There's a lot of things that were never indicated as such in the games. Interrobamf 16:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete does not belong on the regular Wikipedia, article is more appropriate to create on: GameInfo, Encyclopedia Gamia, GamerWiki, or StrategyWiki.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment There's actually very little strategic content in the article, so there's a good chance the strategy wikis will reject them. The game wikis might take them if the licenses were compatible. ColourBurst 20:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Recreation as pointed out above, also WP:NOT a game guide. Sandstein 19:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as per Interrobamf. wikipediatrix 22:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This defies WP:NOT on so many levels I'm not sure where to begin! RFerreira 05:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as per Interrobamf, good call there. Posted the banner, it won't survive the night. --Dennisthe2 07:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.