Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Soule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.-Wafulz (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Allen Soule

Allen Soule (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

A little bit of this, little bit of that, but at the end of day this person doesn't add up to the WP:BIO notability standard. Nothing much in Google News. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, interesting career path, but not notable. --Dhartung | Talk 07:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No disrespect to Mr. Soule, who sounds like a good dinner guest at least, there's nothing here that demonstrates notability, and no particular place to redirect. --Lockley (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as his ten years as Vermont State Historian should make him notable as a historian but some additional referencing would certainly be called for here. I agree he's not notable as an actor or as a radio personality, per se, but few historians are. - Dravecky (talk) 22:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Apart from having been a Vermon State historian, there does not seem to be much else to indicate notability per WP:BIO or WP:PROF. He did not seem to have made substantial impact as a scholar based of googlescholar and googlebooks results. Regarding being a Vermont State Historian, unless one views this position itself as a major award or honor (which it does not appear to be, at least to me), it would not make him pass either WP:BIO or WP:PROF. In the absence of other evidence of notability, this looks like a delete case to me. Nsk92 (talk) 17:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.