User talk:53180/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Question:

Why do you blank you talk page? Can't you just make an archive? And after only a few posts, you blank it. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 03:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

It's better to make an archive then to blank it, then people can see easily a record of your past. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 03:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA

Sorry, but I closed and withdrew your request for adminship, given that you blanked it, and given that there was little chance that it would have received enough support to eventually succeed. However, don't be discouraged; I recommend that you take advice that people suggested in the discussion, and continue improving, so that perhaps a later renomination would be successful. Good luck, and don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions or need anything. — TKD::Talk 03:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I see you've opened number 2. We could close that and reopen number one for a while, but I don't think either has much chance of succeeding. It's rare that anyone with under 1,000 edits passes RFA, even when they use show-preview every time.--Chaser - T 04:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but opening a new RfA when the old one just failed is a very, very bad idea. I've already de-listed it. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Your third RFA has been closed. I would suggest if you really want to become an administrator submit yourself to WP:ER and then get at least 1000 edits under your belt. -Icewedge 04:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. Try again soon. Politics rule 05:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Question:

Are you Oldwindybear? You said something like that confused me. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 04:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Please don't blank pages, like you did in this edit to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/53180 2. Natalie 04:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Your third RfA

I have closed your third RfA nom. Please do not create any more RfA noms, or your actions will be taken as disruption of Wikipedia processes and you will be blocked. Please heed the kind advice of other editors given in your first RfA nom. —Kurykh 04:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Notice

You've been blocked for 24 hours for disrupting the RfA process by creating multiple bogus requests after being told to stop. If, after your block is lifted, you continue to create them, I'll extend the block. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. It is not funny. I have to agree with this block! Politics rule 18:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Message on my page

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia.

message Politics rule 22:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Please Stop

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

messagePolitics rule 23:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I did

I did read what you had to say in your RFA, but your Edit Count is low, at 711, and this comment, [1]. As you said, and as I have said, be civil. Every wikipedian has the right to say what they think on a users RFA. Get more edits, and more experience, and I will support you in the future. Politics rule 23:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Additional comment

Please, leaving uncivil comments on someone's talk page is extremely unhelpful and very nonconstructive. If you're serious about wanting to be an administrator, you need to positively contribute to Wikipedia. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Removing notices

Please don't remove cleanup notices from articles, as you did at Disney Channel graphics, unless the problems with the article have been fixed. Thanks. —tregoweth (talk) 11:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.