User talk:208.186.134.104

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Your recent edit to World (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spaghetti tree, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Spaghetti tree was changed by 208.186.134.104 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-11-29T15:40:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lasagna. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 15:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gelatin dessert has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 06:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ballet, you will be blocked from editing. Matt Deres (talk) 02:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Missouri Fox Trotter, you will be blocked from editing. PookeyMaster (talk) 06:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Broccoli has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 22:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Your recent edit to American Idol (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Keith Olbermann. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 10:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Dell Schanze has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 07:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Mormon folklore (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Mormon folklore (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 20:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mormon folklore. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mifter (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Juno (film).
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Qb | your 2 cents 21:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)