User talk:에멜무지로/

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for the following editing you have done. I appreciate it. I know it was quite... rough translation. I'm glad someone got over and made it smoother. Dooly00000 10:13, 4 August 2006 (Korean Time)

Thanks. For the great find, that, GNU Unifont (v001.000 rev1.00) cannot possibly have 16,887 characters in the CJK Unified Ideographs Extension A (3400–4DBF hex) block/range, as the max possible is 6,592. And, also thanks for finding that, there are actually 2,350 characters in Hangul Syllables (AC00–D7AF hex) range in Bitstream Cyberbit (v2.00b) font, instead of 4,399 chars. If inside a font range, creator of the font, skips few characters, then many font applications, mis-reads the total character count, for that range. --Tarikash 10:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC).

Contents

[edit] 쀍

Hi, I am not familiar with Korean. Can you explain the necessity of this redirect to Moon Hee Jun? Leebo T/C 01:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, about a few years ago, 쀍 is a character which was Moon Hee Jun's nickname, but now it's not commonly used to represent him. It doesn't have a clear definition, but is sometimes used to represent negative expressions. --에멜무지로 01:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason the character is not mentioned in the article? Leebo T/C 01:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

에멜무지로 was blocked in KOWP for sockpuppets and rude attitude. He is not innocent. 쀍 is a personal insult words. Don't trust 에멜무지로.

에멜무지로씨. 전 Allen 입니다. 영문판은 아이디가 다르지요. 사용자페이지에 황당한 글을 적어놓곤, 영문판에선 NPOV 위반에 재미를 붙였나보네요. 뷁이나 쀍같은 한국어를 타 언어 사용자들이 모른다고 해서 그걸 NPOV위반으로 악용하면 안됩니다.

뷁,쀍,무뇌충 모두 삭제신청해서 삭제되었습니다. -- Lanism 15:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

하지만 뷁이나 쀍은 예전엔 몰라도 현재는 문희준을 공격하는 말까지는 아니고, 그냥 뜻이 명확하지 않은 '부정적인 표현'일 뿐입니다. 제가 그 넘겨주기를 만든 건 '예전에는' 문희준이랑 관련이 있었기 때문이었지요. 또한 사용자:삶, 사용자:뷁은 제 다중 계정이 아니라고 분명히 말하지 않았나요? 제 사용자 페이지에 써 놓았지만, 아이피가 같게 나오는 건 어쩔 수 없는 현상입니다. / But now 뷁 and 쀍 are not personal insult words. Actually they were, but not now. Now it's just negative expressions (but they don't have definite definitions). The reason why I made them is they "were" related to Moon Hee Jun. And what did I say? 사용자:삶 and 사용자:뷁 are not my sock puppet. I can't help with their IPs (see my note in my user page if necessary). --에멜무지로 03:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your user page

Per Wikipedia:User page, it should not be used for soapboxing. I'm not sure how such allegations against users on other Wikipedia's are normally handled when they show up at this Wikipedia, but your English Wikipedia user page is not the place to rant about it. It's possible to list your Korean Wikipedia accounts without making accusations of administrator abuse or other issues that don't pertain to the English Wikipedia. Leebo T/C 15:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, I'll consider about it. Actually, I want to show everyone in English Wikipedia how Korean Wikipedia is. --에멜무지로 (Emelmujiro) 15:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
This isn't really a suggestion or recommendation. Your user page is treating Wikipedia like a battleground; you are not allowed to host such material on your user page. I'm asking you to remove it before doing so myself. Leebo T/C 15:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I don't mean to sound like I don't care about your situation, and I'm not casting judgment upon you. Leebo T/C 15:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Did you think I was going to take your page off my watchlist? I'm very confused... I really don't want to remove the content from your user page myself. Leebo T/C 21:05, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
But I'm just telling the truth. Nothing can be aggressive or a personal attack with that material. --에멜무지로 (Emelmujiro) 22:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
It's not about being aggressive or making personal attacks, it's about soapboxing. I told you to remove it and you complied. You put it back and I removed it. If you replace it again, you may be blocked for a short time because it is disruptive. Leebo T/C 23:35, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ácuté

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ácuté, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ácuté fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

wrong redirect


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ácuté, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:20, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Actually, it should be Ácúté based on ISO 8859-1. --에멜무지로 (Emelmujiro) 19:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Why are you creating these redirects? No one would ever search for the entries you are creating. Leebo T/C 21:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Because, (Diacritic's name) + (Diacritical marks) easily shows what (Diacritic) is. For example, Ümläüẗ easily shows what umlaut is. --에멜무지로 (Emelmujiro) 22:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
No one would ever search for that though. No one would ever link to it. I don't see any encyclopedic use for them. Leebo T/C 23:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

I've deleted ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬­®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×ØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóôõö÷øùúûüýþÿ because it's a perfect example of a extremely unlikely search term. Leebo T/C 23:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Brĕvĕ
  • Cîrcûmflêx
  • Dőűble acűte
  • Dőűble acűte accent
  • Gràvè
  • Gràvè àccèǹt
  • Hỏỏk
  • Mācrōn
  • Tĩldẽ
  • Ácuté
  • Ácuté áccént
  • Ácúté
  • Ácúté áccént
  • Áćúté
  • Áćúté áććéńt
  • Çedilla
  • Çȩḑiļļa
  • Ümläüt
  • Ümläüẗ
  • Ĉîrĉûmflêx
  • Čǎřǒň
  • ƀⱥɍ
  • Ǫgǫnęk
  • Ȟáčěǩ
  • Ȟǎčěǩ
  • Ƀⱥɍ

The above were nominated for speedy deletion, as per CSD R3. --Kjoonlee 12:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

And they were all deleted. Please don't create superfluous redirects. --Kjoonlee 13:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Erroneous Korean spelling corrections

If you are going to change older spellings of Korean terms to the modern, offical spellings, you must be careful while doing it.

In the article Sejong the Great of Joseon, you changed Hunmin Cheongum Haerye to Hunmin Jeongum Haerye. The original spelling was correct, although old-fashioned. There was a redirect article under that spelling that directed readers to the article with the modern spelling, which is Hunmin Jeongeum Haerye.

However, the spelling you introduced, Hunmin Jeongum Haerye, is just wrong, and has never been used by anyone anywhere. There was no redirect in place for that spelling, and so your change what was working link into a broken link, and a correct (but old-fashioned) spelling into an incorrect one.

I appreciate that you are trying to modernize the romanizations here, but I question the wisdom of doing it, unless you can be more careful than you have been.

-- Dominus 01:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

According to McCune-Reischuaer, It can't be Cheongum. It should be Chŏngŭm (without diacritics Chongum). Cheongum is a mixture of Revised Romanization and McCune-Reischuaer. --에멜무지로 (Emelmujiro) 03:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] UNCYCLOPEDIA 관련

안녕하세요.UNYPOLY입니다. 억울하게 제가 언사에서 차단되었는데 도와주세요.

그리고 지금은 지워진 님이 억울하다고 주장하는 부분에 저에 관한 내용이 있던데 해석 부탁드립니다. Betalph 05:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

ALL DENIED. --에멜무지로 (Emelmujiro) 06:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Temporary block

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 hour as a result of your continued soapboxing on your user page. Wikipedia is not a battleground, and your user page is not the place to carry over disputes from other Wikipedias. Do not add such material again. Leebo T/C 16:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

But it was just a "single sentence." I didn't replace the whole story. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 06:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
And it was just 1 hour, during which you were probably asleep. That said, no amount of this story is approrpriate on your user page. Leebo T/C 15:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 天

[1]. 가로 획 길이가 글꼴에 따라 다릅니다. 윗쪽이 더 길기도 하고, 아랫쪽이 길기도 하고요. 末과 未의 차이는 아시죠?? -- ChongDae 18:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

末과 未은 아예 '다른 글자'지만, 저 경우는 아니니까 별 문제 될 건 없다고 봅니다. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 06:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Periodic Table

Could you discuss your changes to the periodic table at Talk:Periodic table (standard)? Thanks Flying Jazz 08:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gha (letter)

Hi,

If you insist on deleting Gha (letter) and its talk page, those will need to be nominated at redirects for discussion. "No longer in use" is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion (in fact, old revisions of existing pages may be pointing to it), and redirects are generally cheap in terms of system resources. — TKD::Talk 06:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] My concern about your username

Hello, 에멜무지로, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you. Bushcarrot Talk Please Sign! 18:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • The RFCN was closed as allowed by Ryan Postlethwaite. Usernames consisting of non-Latin characters are allowed by the username policy unless there is some concern about what the name says. Leebo T/C 18:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for allowing my user name in Hangul (Korean). In addition, "에멜무지로" is romanized as "Emelmujiro." (User:Emelmujiro redirects my user page, User:에멜무지로.) In Korean, "에멜무지로" is a word but not commonly used. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 18:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you already satisfied both recommendations of the policy for non-Latin names, which is a transliterated redirect and a transliterated signature. Should be fine. Leebo T/C 18:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spurious redirects, again

The above were nominated for speedy deletion. Please don't create spurious redirects. --Kjoonlee 08:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Even ☁ redirects to Cloud. "Doesn't display on your browser" doesn't mean "nothing." --User:에멜무지로/Sig 08:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
No, WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason to keep. The cloud redirect needs to be deleted as well. Thanks! And I can see the characters just fine, thanks. --Kjoonlee 09:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Then we should not keep Quốc Ngữ redirect. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 09:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
You're right. Nominated. --Kjoonlee 09:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, You don't think that redirects are cheap, do you? --User:에멜무지로/Sig 09:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Redirects are cheap when they don't cheapen Wikipedia. --Kjoonlee 09:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] soapboxing again

Hi, you've been soapboxing again, even after you had been warned, and blocked.diff

Please delete it. --Kjoonlee 09:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Whatever. I don't speak English fluently, so that text, which is called "soapboxing," probably has a lot of mistakes. That means almost nobody would understand that text. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 09:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
So you want to be blocked for lousy English soapboxing? FYI I could understand it without problems, though. --Kjoonlee 09:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't know how you understood my "lousy English soapboxing." However your request has ACCEPTED. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 09:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Hiding it again won't solve it. You know that. --Kjoonlee 09:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Done. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 09:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
OK, thank you. :) --Kjoonlee 09:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Um, you're at it again! --Kjoonlee 12:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

If you don't resolve this yourself, it will be reported to WP:ANI. --Kjoonlee 12:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Phew... --User:에멜무지로/Sig 01:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Hm, why don't you remove the whole section, while you're at it..? --Kjoonlee 04:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

If you're unwilling to cooperate, drastic measures might have to be taken. --Kjoonlee 17:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

No soapboxing on my user page now. That single sentence I only left from my another soapboxing is just a truth, what I believe and keep it in my mind. I think I saw somebody has written the Bible phrase which somebody believes on somebody's user page. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 18:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Uh-uh. It's a trace from your previous soapboxing. Remove it, please. --Kjoonlee 19:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
So enough of your excuses. If you really believe in what you say, at least write it anew instead of copying it verbatim from soapboxing. Always excuses, excuses? --Kjoonlee 22:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Need I remind you that foot-dragging never helped anyone..? --Kjoonlee 19:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Denied. It doesn't matter where it is from. BUT If Wikipedia policies explain about that, then tell me. / And nobody cares that sentence but you. I will ignore your warning about this unless other users care about that. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 01:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bwelk?

Bwelk? WP:NPA --Kjoonlee 09:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:에멜무지로/Sandbox. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kjoonlee 09:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

With regard to your comments on User:에멜무지로: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Kjoonlee 10:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: sandbox

Unicode's jamo names can be desribed as phonemic transliteration. --Kjoonlee 09:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I also know that. But Unicode Romanization is the mixture of "Revised Romanization" and "Yale Romanization." But according to that two Romanizations, ㅝ can't be WEO, ㅢ can't be YI, etc. These things make confused. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 09:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Esperanto Scrabble

Can I ask where you got these figures from? As far as I know, Scrabble has never been produced in Esperanto. Calr 09:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I got that from fr:Lettres de Scrabble#Esperanto. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 09:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] More implausible redirects

I've deleted ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬­®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×ØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóôõö÷øùúûüýþÿ and Zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcba. You were asked before and I'll ask again; please stop creating redirects that do not serve a purpose as described at Wikipedia:Redirect. No one would search for these strings and no one would link to them with those articles intended. Leebo T/C 13:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits

Regarding your edits to ☁:

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Prodego talk 03:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


Regarding your edits to ☁:

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Prodego talk 01:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

Just stumbled upon your user page cause you edited the Pinyin page. I saw your opinion on Korean Romanization; well, I don't find romanization completely useless. Imagine you visit another country and your name on your passport is in Hangul; not many people outside of Korea can read Hangul, that's why we have romanization in the first place. The same applies to Chinese too. As for the family name part, not only Korean have this problem, Chinese also have this problem too; for example, I am Oversea Chinese and my surname is "Chiew", which is rendered "Zhou" in Pinyin and "Chou" in Wade-Giles. My father has 4 brothers and all 5 of them have 3 different English surnames! Sorta funny and complicated right? Cheers, Joshua Say "hi" to me!What have I done? 11:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, we must use romanized name on the passport, but I disagree with the romanization system which is made by government, or country. We have rights to romanize one's name by one's own way.
I'm surprised that Chinese people have this kind of problems, too. I know there are some people keep using Wade-Giles, but I didn't realized that is still very complicated. Thank you for your information about the romanization of Chinese names. :)
All of the Korean romanization is perfectly terrible because it's not well-made and not well-used. During a long period, Koreans used McCune-Reischauer, which uses diacritics. But the diacritics are usually omitted because they are difficult to type on the computer keyboard, so no one wants to follow that romanization. To get rid of this problem, Korean government made new romanization system of Korean language on 2000, which is called Revised Romanization of Korean. But it's too late; i18n is already started since the late 1990s. Many people who aren't in Korea are still using McCune-Reischauer system. This stands for Korean government made such a stupid horrible garbage romanization.
This is why I think the romanization system (especially Korean romanization system) is perfectly useless. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 22:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ridiculous redirects

A tag has been placed on Dante and Randal and Jay and Silent Bob and a Bunch of New Characters and Lando, Take Part in a Whole Bunch of Movie Parodies Including But Not Exclusive To, The Bad News Bears, The Last Starfighter, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Plus a High Schoo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat 02:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC) OR ==Dante and Randal and Jay and Silent Bob and a Bunch of New Characters and Lando, Take Part in a Whole Bunch of Movie Parodies Including But Not Exclusive To, The Bad News Bears, The Last Starfighter, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Plus a High Schoo== A tag has been placed on Dante and Randal and Jay and Silent Bob and a Bunch of New Characters and Lando, Take Part in a Whole Bunch of Movie Parodies Including But Not Exclusive To, The Bad News Bears, The Last Starfighter, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Plus a High Schoo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat 02:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

  • That also goes for Acetylseryltyrosylserylisoleucylthreonylserylprolylserylglutaminylphenylalanylvalylphenylalanylleucylserylserylvalyltryptophylalanylaspartylprolylisoleucylglutamylleucylleucylasparaginylvalylcysteinylthreonylserylserylleucylglycylasparaginylglutaminylphen and 1185-letter word. I am reporting you for vandalism, as you were warned about this back on the 7th. Improbcat 02:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
  • As you have been warned about this before (including by me), I have blocked you for 72 hours. Please contact me (by email obviously) if you care to explain yourself. Prodego talk 03:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Archive

Please archive your talk page instead of blanking it, thanks. --Kjoonlee 06:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

However you can see my previous talk page by the edit history. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 07:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)