User talk:에멜무지로

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Philip Baird Shearer 20:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] First topic

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kjoonlee 18:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean? --User:에멜무지로/Sig 18:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Need I explain? --Kjoonlee 18:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Seriously, what do you mean? I didn't even attack you. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 18:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
No? You're attacking people left and right. Also, "bwelk" is profanity. You woulnd't say "shucks" or "geez" and get away. --Kjoonlee 18:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
"Bwelk" doesn't mean anything in English. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 18:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Excuses, excuses. You know as well as I do that that's irrelevant. --Kjoonlee 19:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Come to think of it, it's very relevant since you get a chance at a lame excuse to get away with profanity. Worse than any English profanity. --Kjoonlee 19:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean it's worse than any English profanity? That doesn't mean anything in English. And if it's a profanity, it isn't worse than any English profanity. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 19:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Oh, so you won't mind if people start saying "Emelmujiro ssipssaekki" on their English user pages? --Kjoonlee 19:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, but bwelk isn't worse than ssipsaekki. I know bwelk is a negative expression, but it doesn't have a clear definition. FYI someone still usually uses bwelk, but they don't mean kind-of-ssipsaekki profanities. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 19:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
That's irrelevant as well. It isn't a matter or severity. You shouldn't be using any profanity at all. --Kjoonlee 19:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
You shouldn't be using "geez" or "shucks" in your edit summaries either, especially when you use those to evade valid points. --Kjoonlee 19:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Policy evasion

Hi, if you try to sneak in soapboxing or personal attacks where people don't suspect it, I'll have to report you to WP:ANI. --Kjoonlee 20:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Once more and you'll be reported. --Kjoonlee 12:37, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
What? Why? They are "Criticisms!" --User:에멜무지로/Sig 02:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
This has been discussed, and you know it's inappropriate. Do not add such content anywhere. Leebo T/C 03:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
It's not a soapboxing! It's actually criticisms! You can't call that soapboxing. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 04:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
You've just admitted that it is soapboxing. Userspace isn't a place for criticism of any kind which doesn't help cooperation within the English Wikipedia. So no irrelevant criticism, which is by definition, soapboxing. --Kjoonlee 05:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Let's look at User:에멜무지로/Sandbox%C2%AD, for example. This sort of behaviour is not allowed. --Kjoonlee 05:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Are you trying to make a distinction between "soapboxing" and "criticism"? There's no difference in this case; the content was always a criticism of the Korean Wikipedia. Guess what? That's inappropriate content for an English Wikipedia subpage, just like a subpage criticizing your local government would be an inappropriate soapboxing page. I don't know where you got the idea that criticism was somehow allowed even though it has nothing to do with your English Wikipedia account. Leebo T/C 10:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Also, I don't speak English very well, so no one would understand that. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 22:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

That's not true. You should have more self esteem about your English, if you're not faking it. Nevertheless, that is irrelevant. Everyone can understand that it's still soapboxing. --Kjoonlee 23:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm not en-M; I'm en-2. This stands that my English is not as good as en-M, like you. --­ 17:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
That's no excuse. You're coming up with excuses in good English. --Kjoonlee 17:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cut and past moves

Cut and past moves as you did between Facade and Façade are a depreciated because it destroys the history of an article which may be needed to prove copyright. see Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves. If you wish to ask an admin to make this controversial move the put in a request at WP:RM. If you make the same cut and past move again I will block you account for a period of time. Also when you moved Talk:Facade to Talk:Façade you deliberately edited the resulting redirect so that there were two edits in the edit history which as you must be aware means that other users can not move a page back. As this effected the talk page of the article you had cut and past move it was disruptive behaviour (because it split the history of the article and the talk page over two different page names and an ordinary editor would have had to ask an administrator to clean up you mess), so doing this could also have resulted in a edit suspension. --Philip Baird Shearer —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 20:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Minor" edits

Hi, please don't mark potentially controversial edits as minor. Never mark controversial edits as minor. --Kjoonlee 00:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Please don't remove comments without explaining why. --Kjoonlee 08:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Stop removing comments without explaining why. --Kjoonlee 01:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your templated sig

Templated signatures are disallowed, for various reasons. One is that it's a strain on the servers to transclude your signature page all over the place. Another is that someone could edit that page to something else quite easily. Please use a signature that is not templated. Leebo T/C 22:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

But it won't cause a big problem. I think it's not a big deal. --User:에멜무지로/Sig 02:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
This isn't a suggestion. If you do not remove the templated sig, I will delete the subpage you are using to transclude it. Leebo T/C 03:03, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

It does cause big problems. WP:SIG#Transclusion of templates --Kjoonlee 18:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your talk page archive

Hi, is there a good reason you don't link to your talk page archive? --Kjoonlee 10:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

You did say the past must be forgotten, but you're repeating the same mistakes so why bother keeping it hidden. --Kjoonlee 10:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
This is true, you should link to your archive at the top of this page. Leebo T/C 20:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bad redirects yet again

As mentioned at User talk:에멜무지로/#Ácuté, Ą˘Ł¤ĽŚ§¨ŠŞŤŹ­ŽŻ°ą˛ł´ľśˇ¸šşťź˝žżŔÁÂĂÄĹĆÇČÉĘËĚÍÎĎĐŃŇÓÔŐÖ×ŘŮÚŰÜÝŢßŕáâăäĺćçčéęëěíîďđńňóôőö÷řůúűüýţ˙ is a perfect example of a bad redirect. Please don't create bad redirects. --Kjoonlee 23:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Facade (disambiguation)

Editing to just to block redirects is not acting in good faith. [1] --Philip Baird Shearer 09:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You have been reported

Hi, you have been reported for soapboxing at WP:ANI#Soapboxing from User:에멜무지로. Please stop soapboxing. --Kjoonlee 16:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't delete material without providing a reason. --Kjoonlee 17:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Please also stop deleting warnings from this talkpage until people can evaluate them. Please also, don't delete discussions from WP:ANI as you have. - Alison ❤ 17:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yet another bad redirect

1234567890 and other pages were deleted because they were bad redirects. Please don't recreate them. --Kjoonlee 17:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of one week for soapboxing and deleting material from an administrative noticeboard. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Raymond Arritt 17:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 위키백과

오늘 우연히 체크유저 요청소에서 쿼티씨가 hanguler를 다중계정으로 만들어 활동한 사실을 확인 하였습니다. 한편 위키백과의 체크유징에서도 저의 무고가 확인되었으나 체크유저가 한국의 인터넷 현실(대부분의 사람이 kt인터넷을 사용)을 모르고 완전한 무죄가 되어야 할것을 증거가 없고 다중계정이 의심된다는 잘못된 결론을 내렸습니다. 주소는 [2] 입니다. 아무튼 님의 무고는 확인되었슴을 알립니다.Betalph 12:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 백괴사전

님의 도와주신다면 저와 orbitaly님의 차단이 해제될 것입니다. 도와주세요Kverti (talk) 00:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 에멜무지로?

Hmmm.. I didn't know people were allowed to have usernames in non-English alphabet. Do you know if you have to change it? Anyways, I guess the other reason why I am leaving a comment is because I really wanted say hi. I am ko:사용자:Howlongcanyourusernamebe You are quite active in the Korean Wikipedia. mirageinred (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Juche

Why the name chuche? I've never heard Juche referred to that way? --Gosplan (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Because the romanization systems used in South and North Korea are different. 주체 is romanized as "Juche" in Revised Romanization of Korean (RRoK), but "Chuch'e" according to the McCune-Reischauer. North Korea doesn't use RRoK; therefore "Chuch'e" is correct way to romanize. --­ 01:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I did not realize that because the situation in China is opposite. However nearly all foreign media including Juche groups officially associated with DPRK use the term Juche.--Gosplan (talk) 01:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] HTML color name lists

FYI, I've redirected both List of HTML color names and List of HTML colour names to Web colors#X11 color names since they were already listed there. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 22:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alphabets derived from the Latin

Please discuss Talk:Alphabets derived from the Latin. -- BIL (talk) 22:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yet more bad redirects

Hi, the above were nominated for speedy deletion. I trust you to know why; please don't repeat such mistakes. --Kjoonlee 12:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Üm̈l̈äüẗ.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Üm̈l̈äüẗ.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ĉîr̂ĉûm̂f̂l̂êx̂.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ĉîr̂ĉûm̂f̂l̂êx̂.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit on Kwamikagami's user page

It may or may not be true that Phagspa is related to Hangul, but in any case you are not allowed to remove content (or otherwise edit) another user's User page as you did. --Macrakis (talk) 20:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit on Korean regions

You're an established user, so I don't give a vandalism warning. Why did you insert weird words to articles that I could not find any verifiable source presented by you to prove your claim. I've seen your weird editing on Korean language related articles which of course quickly are restored by many others. Please refrain yourself from producing such disruptive edits. Regards. --Appletrees (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hangul

What do you mean, "evidence please"? There's a whole discussion about it. The OED has "hangul". Webster's has "hangul". And according to Random House, hangul is a common noun, not a proper noun, even in Korean. kwami (talk) 18:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfD nomination of 𝄪

I have nominated 𝄪 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. This, that and the other [talk] 08:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)