Talk:Warner Bros. Movie World
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Warner Bros. Movie World is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Amusement Parks, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Amusement parks. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Keeping Australia on the map!
I encourage anyone who is interested in theme parks or Movie World to add information to the Movie World Wikipedia entry. Adame
- There was actually quite a lot of information, but unfortunately the whole page was deleted for some reason (apparently a copyvio), by User:Petaholmes, who won't reply to me. secfan 10:41, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
- I haven't seen the previous version but that sucks! I'll see if I can find it on archive.org. How was it a copyright violation? Where was the information taken from? User:adame 11:41, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
- at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&limit=500&offset=500&type=delete&user=Petaholmes&page= , it says: 08:56, July 29, 2005 Petaholmes deleted "Warner Bros. Movie World" (copyvio july 18). my response on his talk page was: Why was Warner Bros. Movie World deleted (on july 29)? It might have been a copyvio, but it is a well known and notable set of theme parks. And there are heaps of redirects to it which are now broken. At the very least the non-copyvio information could have been kept? secfan 03:34, August 7, 2005 (UTC). havent received any response yet. --secfan 14:37, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WBMWhollywood.JPG
Image:WBMWhollywood.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
