User talk:Vodomar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
|
[edit] Please see
...Talk:Croatian War of Independence and my comments to the bottom. It cannot be compared to the American War of Independence - as Croatia was not fighting to gain its independence throughout the majority during the war (unlike the U.S.), but fighting against a seperatists' War of Independence. --HolyRomanEmperor 12:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Very funny, HRE call it what you like - it will still be Croatian War of Independence, and by the same token, this is a quote: "...Colonists were divided over which side to support in the war; in some areas, the struggle was a civil war. The Revolutionaries (also known as "Americans" or "Patriots") had the active support of about 40 to 45 percent of the colonial population. About 15 to 20 percent of the population supported the British Crown during the war and were known as Loyalists (or Tories). " taken from American_Revolutionary_War#Armies.2C_militias.2C_and_mercenaries. So the independece was not supported by the majority as you have stated above. So by taking simple reasoning, by your definition and statements made above the would fit what happened in the US: a separatists War of Independece . Vodomar 00:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- What are you talking about? All I was trying to say is that RSK fought for its independence against Croatia; and not stop Croatia from receiving its independence (which was already bygone received). --HolyRomanEmperor 09:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I did see that. The signee was an IP address, so I did not consider it coming from you. Vodomar 21:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Notability of Cardinal Stepinac Village
A tag has been placed on Cardinal Stepinac Village, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — coelacan — 02:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hanging in NDH
I've noticed you left an entry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanging in NDH, but it is not entirely clear whether it was meant as a comment or a vote. Could you precede your entry with an appropriate text (Comment or Delete - as I gather that Keep is out of the question)? GregorB 21:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mark Spencer (Australia)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Spencer (Australia), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mark Spencer (Australia). B. Wolterding (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
