Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanging in NDH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hanging in NDH

Hanging in NDH (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article Hanging in NDH is irrelevant, as it has been covered in other articles that cover the genocide that occured during the time of NDH. The article should be edited and moved to the main article. West Brom 4ever 15:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

This artice is just another example of creating articles out of miniscule information, which would fit in a section or paragraph in an aricle about genocide in NDH. Vodomar 15:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Article is unsourced and unreferenced. A few sentences that are worth keeping are not enough for separate article. --Ante Perkovic 23:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. In Croatian wikipedia meatpuppets are called to say delete that article. If you want link, i will give you. --Medule 20:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Almost totally unreferenced, redundant, and potentially slanderous. All-around bad article. Mihovil 03:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete an article on war crimes of the Croatian state would be encyclopedic, if it could be referenced; hangings of civilians could be part of that article, but without context, hangings in and of themselves don't appear encyclopedic. Carlossuarez46 19:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, mostly per WP:SYN. The subject is somewhat arbitrary and thus unencyclopedic: "hanging in NDH" is not notable per se, as it was an execution method not particularly prominent nor characteristic of NDH (contrary to what the article claims). Content may still be useful, but only as a referenced part of a broader article, as duly noted by Carlossuarez46. GregorB 20:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.