User talk:Vizjim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Corticopia's case
Hey I saw your report against Corticopia at Wikiquett alerts, you might've noticed that I also complained about this user but they said that that wasn't the place for that type of issues, so why don't we report him at the WP:AN/I, you've got my support if you want. Supaman89 01:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Done, let's see what happens. Supaman89 17:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm doing it right now, I'm gathering a good list, by the way, did you see 3meandEr's message on Corticopia's page? it seems like he had a problem with him as well, why don't you leave him a message so he'll testify against Corti as well, the more of us the better. Supaman89 16:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The issue was posted to AN/I, dozens or hundreds of eyes looked over it, and no one felt anything needed to be done. There's nothing going on at Geography of Cyprus now, and historic behaviour has been addressed as its cropped up. While he may accumulate blocks from time to time, productive editors who occasionally cross the lines can be reined in as needed. Everything on AN/I gets lots of eyes - few or no responses means nobody feels anything needs to be done. I'm fairly sure Corticopia knows he's got eyes on him. Cheers, WilyD 15:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:Corticopia again
My point at WP:AN/I was that pointing to edits he did months ago and was blocked for tended to distract from the discussion. The discussion would have been cleared if you have gone "Hi, he was blocked on this day, but since then, he has done the following..." Sometimes, a shorter clearer statement is better than a lot of evidence that's only partially relevant. I have noticed some odd behavior from him (no edits on talk pages and what looks like a lot of undos of particular people's work, called wikistalking). For the 'bastards' line, one uncivil comment (again, no talk page edits so I can't say anything more) isn't going to get people riled up. Last, a reminder that he is allowed to blank his talk page so repeating that allegation will simply get it ignored. If he is being disruptive on a particular page, please feel free to ask me for help. You may consider something like (1) letting him edit and then (2) revert with an edit summary asking him to respond on the talk page. If he doesn't respond to numerous requests like that, post a request for him to do so on his user talk page. If he still doesn't respond, then you have a clear disruption point to bring up and is will be clear that he is not interested in discussion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/United Nations Parliamentary Assembly
Hello, I have created an article about the UN Parliamentary Assembly, a proposed world body that would be similar to Europarl. Please review and vote on the WP:FAC nomination. Thanks, Sarsaparilla (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Books by writers from peoples indigenous to the Americas
Category:Books by writers from peoples indigenous to the Americas, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 11:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] YO!
Please find a country in the list which is from the continent of America. None. However they are mainly European countries. The English used in Europe is British and Irish English, which spells recognise with a "S" not a "Z". If it was more to do with America i would not object to using a "Z", however its not. Peace! Ijanderson977 (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
