|
User talk:Ijanderson977
 |
Welcome to my talk page! If you leave me a message, I'll try to respond to it as soon as possible. I'll usually respond on your talk page so that you'll get a "new messages" notice.[1] Click here to leave a new message.
|
This page is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox or Netscape. For God's sake, don't use Internet Explorer!!!
[edit] Int Reaction Kos 2008
I thought you'd jump the gun to make an editrequest to include the part where it was the first time since both sides sat together...considering that another Serbian rep just bolted yesterday [1] --Kosova2008 (talk) 20:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- How is it POV when you are presenting a fact? It's a FACT that it was the FIRST TIME that both sides sat together without the little kids from belgrade running out in tears, it's a fact. BTW do you know who has been editing this article without discussions? That's awfully anti-democratic. Kosova2008 (talk) 21:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: commons
Ian, I replied on my talk page, btw. --Mareklug talk 15:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Mickey Mouse Club
I am having trouble with an editor removing information of mine that is sourced and cited very well. They are telling me that an "uninterested" editor needs to publish the information, which makes no sense to me as an "uninterested" editor would have no reason to do so. Zachary Jaydon was a cast member on The Mickey Mouse Club, and I have cited numerous Official, Reliable, Non-Secondary Disney Publications that provide this information clearly. The editor keeps removing the information without taking the time to check the sources, which can be done if a small amount of effort is put into it. I believe that this goes against Wiki policy as well as a major lack of the assumption of good faith. Removing unsourced information is one thing, but when an editor takes the time to make an article more informative and accurate, it's very discouraging. Please help!
Skyler Morgan (talk) 20:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- A bit more investigation may have revealed a different image than you got from TragedyStriker, aka "Skyler Morgan". He is pretty much a single purpose account, dedicated to including information on Zachary Jaydon inside of Wikipedia. None of the works discussing the Mickey Mouse Club include Zachary Jaydon. In fact, the only sources that anyone can find on Zachary are things like IMDB, where the fact checking is pretty loose. Months after trying to get Zachary included, TragedyStriker pops up with a fairly obscure reference: Disney Channel house magazines from 15 years ago. The consensus among all other editors on the article is that the information should stay out until some disinterested editor manages to see a copy of one of these things. I've made a good faith effort, e-mailing editors that have edited the article in the past, posting a request on the RS noticeboard, discussing it on the talk page with other users.
Far from being a problem with me, TragedyStriker's edits have been reverted by me, User:Saratoga Sam, and User:C.Fred. He just hit the fourth revert in 24 hours, so he has now been reported on the 3RR noticeboard. Kww (talk) 20:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- It happens. A lot of people think I'm an admin, so I get similar requests on my talk page. I've learned that look before you leap is a very useful old adage in such situations. Kww (talk) 22:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] References
[edit] thank you for the barnstar. These are rare... :)
I think I got everything in your recent uploads (more than what's in the gallery). If I missed anything, or you need new descriptions, holler. Double check that Jewish cementary -- is it really "near Krakow"? I changed it to "in Krakow", and you might wish to revert that change. Best, --Mareklug talk 22:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
|
