User talk:TragedyStriker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, TragedyStriker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Spellcast 00:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Craig David

Hi Striker, please don't re-add information without a source - see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Trivia sections. Almost all the trivia is irrelevant and can't be integrated anyway. Thanks. Spellcast 00:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem :) If you need any help, just leave a message. Cheers. Spellcast 01:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

  1. See WP:CITE#How_to_cite_sources
  2. Use {{fact}}
  3. You can always try the talk page on an article if you want any help. Spellcast 01:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You Very Much Striker

One question though. Can I successful mention this without being brought up by other users as a possible stalker?Kevin j (talk) 00:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Referring to oher peoples talk page warnings as evidence of wrongdoing when you simply wipe yours from your own talk page is simply not on. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 06:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Posting personal information

There has been a complain here that you are posting personal information. Wikipedia respects the privacy of our users, and if they want to stay anonymous, they have the right to do so. Posting personal information when they do not want it here goes against our privacy respect, and if you continue to do so you will be blocked. Please understand that any quarrel you may have can be resolved by not recurring to these methods. Thanks for understanding. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sandbox

I've created a sandbox for you. The link is on your userpage. Put your article there, and let me know when you are finished, I'll take a look. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 08:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


You've created the article on your userpage rather than the sandbox but it doesn't particlulaly matter. I've added a reflist section. Note that trivia sections are not encouraged. Also with references quality beats quantity. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 12:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


I've done a little work to help out. The tone of the article needs improving, it's not neutral enough. I've removed some of the references. There are plenty of others that need to go but I don't have time at the moment. I've also asked for citations in the text where a fact could really do with a reference. This article is going to need to be pretty solid when it goes live because it's already been deleted once, so you need to get everything well corroborated by solid independent sources. ( not IMDB, not myspace, not answers.com. etc. I'll take another look later when I get more time. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 16:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Zachary Jaydon

A tag has been placed on Zachary Jaydon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Closedmouth (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Zachary Jaydon

I have nominated Zachary Jaydon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Jaydon (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Toddst1 (talk) 01:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I saw your multiple requests and declined the speedy deletion, took it to AfD for you. Toddst1 (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Jaydon (2nd nomination), you will be blocked for vandalism. Toddst1 (talk) 22:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mickey Mouse Club

Please don't add Zachary Jaydon back to the Mickey Mouse Club article until you have a source. You are well aware that the consensus is that he was never on the show. Until you have evidence to contradict that, don't add him back.Kww (talk) 06:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Mickey Mouse Club. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kww (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


I have warned user Kww for you, but that is all I can do for now. Try discussing with him on the discussion page or his talk page. ;) Ijanderson977 (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


Also if you have any other problems, try reporting your case on WP:ANI ;) Ijanderson977 (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR report filed

here. Kww (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours for edit warring on the The Mickey Mouse Club article. If you wish to contest this block please use the {{unblock}} template. ScarianCall me Pat! 22:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Magazine sources

Where did you find the information that you provided in Mickey Mouse Club for the inclusion of Jaydon as a cast member? If you can email me scans of the materials, or links to whatever archives you found them in for the sake of verifiability, then I'll be happy to vouch for the sources you included. Celarnor Talk to me 03:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Distintrested editor? – I think he meant a third party editor. Im currently on wiki-break but I will look into this more tomorrow. All I can say at the moment is that you both are at fault, instead of edit warring you should have both of you) kept civil and kept it to the talk pages. If I were you I would of left it as the other editor wanted it, talked it out and come to a conclusion. I cannot access the sources you provided so Im not sure about it, but as I said I would look into it when I have the time.Fattyjwoods Push my button 05:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)