Two Knights Defense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

Two Knights Defense
Moves	1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6
ECO	C55-C59
Origin	late 16th century
Parent	Open Game
Chessgames.com opening explorer

The Two Knights Defense is a chess opening that begins

1. e4 e5

2. Nf3 Nc6

3. Bc4 Nf6

First recorded by Polerio^[1] (c.1550–c.1610) in the late 16th century, this line of the Italian Game was extensively developed in the 19th century. Black's third move is a more aggressive defense than the Giuoco Piano which would result from 3...Bc5. In fact, Bronstein suggested that the term "defense" does not fit, and that the name "Chigorin Counterattack" would be more appropriate.^[2] The Two Knights has been adopted as Black by many aggressive players including Chigorin and Keres, and World Champions Tal and Boris Spassky. The theory of this opening has been explored extensively in correspondence chess by players such as Berliner and Estrin.

Contents 1 Main variations 1.1 4.Ng5 1.2 4.Nc3 1.3 4.d3 1.4 4.d4 2 References 3 External links

[edit] Main variations

Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit

Max Lange Attack

Wilkes-Barre or Traxler Variation

White must respond to the attack on his e-pawn (For explanation of notation, see Chess Opening Theory Table).

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6

	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Wilkes-Barre or Traxler Variation	Ng5 Bc5!?	Bxf7+! Ke7	Bd5! -	- -	- -	- -	- -
Lolli Variation	... d5	exd5 Nxd5?!	d4! -	- -	- -	- -	- -
Fried Liver Attack	... ...	... ...	Nxf7!? Kxf7	Qf3+ Ke6	Nc3 Nb4	a3! Nxc2+	Kd1 Nxa1	- -
Morphy Variation	... d5	exd5 Na5	d3 h6	Nf3 e4	Qe2 Nxc4	dxc4 Bc5	- -
Main Line	... ...	... ...	Bb5+ c6	dxc6 bxc6	Be2 h6	Nf3 e4	Ne5 -
Steinitz Variation	... ...	... ...	... ...	... ...	... ...	Nh3 -	- -
Ulvestad Variation	... ...	... b5	Bf1! Nd4	c3 Nxd5	Ne4 -	- -	- -
Fritz Variation	... ...	... Nd4	c3 b5	Bf1! Nxd5	Ne4 -	- -	- -
Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit	Nc3 Nxe4	O-O Nxc3	dxc3 Qe7	Ng5 Nd8	- -	- -	- -
Giuoco Pianissimo, by transposition	d3 Bc5	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -
3	... d5!?	exd5 Nxd5	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -
4	... Be7	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -
5	d4 exd4	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -
6	... ...	O-O Nxe4	Re1 d5	Bxd5 Qxd5	Nc3 -	- -	- -
Max Lange Attack	... ...	... Bc5	e5 d5	exf6 dxc4	Re1+ Be6	Ng5 Qd5	Nc3 Qf5
8	... ...	e5 d5	Bb5 Ne4	Nxd4 Bc5	- -	- -	- -
9	... ...	... Ne4	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -
10	... ...	... Ng4	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -

[edit] 4.Ng5

Siegbert Tarrasch called 4.Ng5 a "duffer's move" (ein richtiger Stümperzug) and Panov called it "primitive", but this attack on f7 practically wins a pawn by force. Despite Tarrasch's criticism, many players consider 4.Ng5 to be White's best chance for an advantage and it has been played by World Champions Steinitz, Fischer, Karpov, Kasparov, and Anand.

Czech problemist Karel Traxler played 4...Bc5!? in Reinisch–Traxler, Prague 1896. Some decades later, a few Pennsylvania chess amateurs (mainly K. Williams) analyzed the variation and decided to name it after their town Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, so today 4...Bc5 is known as both the Traxler Variation and (in the U.S.A. only) the Wilkes-Barre Variation. This bold move ignores White's attack on f7 and leads to wild play where some long variations have been analyzed to a draw by perpetual check. White can play 5.d4, 5.Nxf7, or 5.Bxf7+. After 5.d4 d5!, White's best is to go into an equal endgame after 6.dxc5 dxc4 7.Qxd8+. Other sixth moves have scored very badly for White. The usual move used to be 5.Nxf7, but this is very complicated after 5...Bxf2+. The current main lines all lead to drawn or equal positions, e.g. after 6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Kg1, or even 7.Ke3. In the year 2000, this last move (which was already considered by Karel Traxler himself) was credited as the 'refutation' of the Traxler variation, after an article in the New in Chess Yearbook series, featuring a diagram after White's 7th move on the cover. However, computer analysis subsequently showed that Black can probably force a draw after this move as well. White's best try for an advantage is probably 5.Bxf7+ Ke7 6.Bd5 as played by Anand. No grandmasters regularly adopt the Wilkes-Barre as Black, but Beliavsky and Shirov have played it occasionally even in top competition. No clear refutation is known yet.

More common is 4...d5 5.exd5. The Black recapture 5...Nxd5?! is very risky. Pinkus tried to bolster this move with analysis in 1943 and 1944 issues of Chess Review, but White gets a strong attack with either the safe Lolli Variation 6.d4! or the sacrificial Fried Liver (or Fegatello) Attack 6.Nxf7!? Kxf7 7.Qf3+ Ke6 8.Nc3. These variations are usually considered too difficult for Black to defend over the board, but they are sometimes used in correspondence play. Instead Black usually chooses to make the opening a gambit by playing either 5...Na5 (main line), 5...Nd4 or 5...b5.

After 5...Na5, Morphy would hold on to the gambit pawn as White with 6.d3. The Morphy Variation has not been popular, since it has long been known that Black obtains good chances for the pawn with 6...h6 7.Nf3 e4 8.Qe2 Nxc4 9.dxc4 Bc5. (Bronstein once tried the piece sacrifice 8.dxe4!? with success, but its soundness is doubtful.^[2][3]) Instead, White usually plays 6.Bb5+, when play almost always continues 6...c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Be2 h6. (The move 8.Qf3?! was popular in the 19th century and revived by Bogoljubov in the 20th century is still played occasionally, but Black obtains a strong attack after either 8...h6! or 8...Rb8.) White then has a choice of two retreat squares for the king knight. The usual retreat is 9.Nf3 when Black obtains some initiative after 9...e4 10.Ne5 (this is considered to be the main line of the Two Knights Defense). Steinitz favored 9.Nh3 instead although it did not bring him success in his famous 1891 cable match against Chigorin. The Steinitz Variation was mostly forgotten until Fischer revived it in the 1960s. Short led a second revival of 9.Nh3 in the 1990s, and today it is thought to be about equal in strength to the more common 9.Nf3.

Black's alternatives to 5...Na5, the Fritz Variation 5...Nd4 and Ulvestad's Variation 5...b5, are related as they share a common main line. American master Olav Ulvestad introduced the surprising 5...b5 in a 1941 article in Chess Review. White has only one good reply. Weak are 6.Bxb5 Qxd5 7.Bxc6 Qxc6 and 6.dxc6 bxc4 7.Nc3, so White should move the bishop. The best move is the surprising 6.Bf1!, protecting g2 so White can answer 6...Qxd5? with 7.Nc3. Black's best response is to transpose to the Fritz Variation with 6...Nd4 making another advantage of 6.Bf1 apparent—the bishop is not attacked as it would be if White had played 6.Be2. German master Alexander Fritz (1857–1932) suggested 5...Nd4 to Schlechter who wrote about in a 1904 issue of Deutsche Schachzeitung. In 1907 Fritz himself wrote an article about his move in the Swedish journal Tidskrift för Schack. White's best reply is 6.c3, when the game often continues 6...b5 7.Bf1 Nxd5 8.Ne4 or 8.h4.

[edit] 4.Nc3

The attempt to defend the pawn with 4.Nc3 does not work well since Black can take the pawn anyway and use a fork trick to regain the piece, 4.Nc3?! Nxe4! 5.Nxe4 d5. The try 5.Bxf7+? does not help, as Black has the bishop pair and a better position after 5...Kxf7 6.Nxe4 d5. Instead, 4.Nc3 is usually played with the intent to gambit the e-pawn with the Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit, 4.Nc3 Nxe4 5.0-0. This gambit is not commonly seen in tournament play as it is not well regarded by opening theory, but it can offer White good practical chances especially in blitz chess.

[edit] 4.d3

The quiet move 4.d3 transposes into the Giuoco Pianissimo if Black responds 4...Bc5, but there are also independent variations after 4...Be7 or 4...h6. White tries to avoid the tactical battles that are common in other lines of the Two Knights and to enter a more positional game. The resulting positions take on some characteristics of the Ruy Lopez if White plays c3 and retreats the bishop to c2 via Bc4-b3-c2. This move became popular in the 1980s and has been used by John Nunn and others. Black can confound White's attempt to avoid tactical play with 4...d5!?. This move is rarely played as opening theory does not approve, but Jan Piński suggests that it is better than is commonly believed.

[edit] 4.d4

White can choose to develop rapidly with 4.d4 exd4 5.0-0. Now Black can equalize simply by eliminating White's last center pawn with 5...Nxe4, after which White regains the material with 6.Re1 d5 7.Bxd5 Qxd5 8.Nc3 but Black has a comfortable position after 8...Qa5 or 8...Qh5, or obtain good chances with the complex Max Lange Attack after 5...Bc5 6.e5 d5. The extensively analyzed Max Lange can also arise from the Giuoco Piano or Scotch Game. White can choose to avoid these lines by playing 5.e5, a line often adopted by Sveshnikov. After 5.e5, either 5...Ne4 or 5...Ng4 is a playable reply, but most common and natural is 5...d5 6.Bb5 Ne4 7.Nxd4 Bc5, with sharp play.

[edit] References

1. ^ Y.Estrin (1983). The Two Knight's Defence. Batsford. ISBN 0 7134 3991 2. 
2. ^ ^{a b} Bronstein, David [1973] (1991). 200 Open Games. Dover, 60–61. ISBN 0-486-26857-8. 
3. ^ Bronstein–Rojahn, Moscow Olympiad 1956 at chessgames.com

• Hooper, David and Kenneth Whyld (1996). The Oxford Companion To Chess. Oxford University. ISBN 0-19-280049-3. 
• De Firmian, Nick (1999). Modern Chess Openings: MCO-14. Random House Puzzles & Games. ISBN 0-8129-3084-3. 
• Pinski, Jan (2003). The Two Knights Defence. Everyman Chess. ISBN 1-85744-283-0. 
• Unzicker, Wolfgang (1975). Knaurs Neues Schachbuch für Anfänger und Fortgeschrittene. Droemer Knaur. ISBN 3-426-02242-7. 
• (2000) New in Chess Yearbook 55. New in Chess. ISBN 90-5691-069-8. 

[edit] External links

• Harding, Tim (March 2001). The Kibitzer: Two Knights Defense, Part 1 (PDF). Chesscafe.com.
• Harding, Tim (April 2001). The Kibitzer: Two Knights Defense, Part 2 (PDF). Chesscafe.com.
• Harding, Tim (May 2001). The Kibitzer: Two Knights Defense, Part 3 (PDF). Chesscafe.com.