Talk:Sunspot (comics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
 |
Sunspot (comics) is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Brazil and Brazil-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
To-do list for Brazil:
|
|||
 |
This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page. | ||||||||||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here. | ||||||||||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
I have moved the discussion regarding the definitiveness of the OHOTMU here from the metatext of the page proper:
By User Britney Spears: "Actually, the versions of the Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe prior to the 1990's Master Edition and the Editions of 2004-2005 are not considered definitive by editors and writers at all. This is because older editions were written hastilly by TWO editors (Peter Sanderson and Mike Lehrer) who usually did not correspond with the creaters of the characters they were defining and as such thier entries were only marginally accurate. As email and the world wide web did not functionally exist as means of communication between such creative parties the problems were understandable, as writers didn't always have accessable mailing addresses. An assumption readers make is that the person who provided the art for the character in the Marvel Universe also wrote the entry, which was not the case. (example John Byrne for Wolverine in Marvel Universe issue 12 vol.1) Only sometime after 1990 the internet was in wide use and an accurate Marvel Universe was possible. But don't take my word for it, contact Marvel editors and confirm it for yourself. http://www.marvel.com/about/contact_us/email.htm"
The fanbase at large considers the OHOTMUs of the eighties *far* more accurate and better done than the 90s Master Edition. The jury is still out on the 2004-2005 series and it will only accurately be judged after the passage of time. You also overestimate the importance of email and www, presenting the situation as if people somehow lived in isolation prior to the 'enlightened' Age of the Internet, and you suggest that accuracy was impossible prior to the Internet -- a ludicrous claim. You also throw around wild assumptions, like the art argument you make, that seem to have nothing to do with the main point; this combined with your frequent misspellings suggest that you do not really know what you're talking about.
I will seek to corroborate your story regarding the definitiveness of the eighties OHOTMUs from fellow comic book historians, rather than from Marvel's PR department. Sending an email to Marvel's PR people will be the equivalent of calling an IT helpdesk. They're clueless, and to get to the real answers, you will have to go to the actually knowledgeable people behind the scenes.
[edit] Wrong
Your comments about the nomenclatures are wrong. In Spanish Da Costa wouldn't be one word either. For example De la Torre, Del Valle, Lavalle (this one became a single word, we never put capitals in the middle of a word), Del Puerto, De la Rocha, Del Toro or "Mier y Terán". In Italian it's also the same: Da Vinci, Da Angelo, etc. Now that i think about it in French they ise contractions like D'Argeaens, L'Something and is probbably only in English that last names goes MacSomethings or McThat or O'Somebodies, but nope, you will never see 2 capital letters in the sameword in Spanish.
--201.114.99.246 05:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Just a sidenote to an otherwise correct mini-dissertation on nomenclature - only names with origins from say, Irish or Scottish, have capitals in the middle, either, in English (MacDonald, for instance, which IRRC means "from the clan of Donald"). It's true that members of those countries also speak English (though they also speak other languages, too), but real "English" names, even when they come from two seperate words, like "Shakespeare", do NOT have random capitals in the middle of a word either, at least not any I've ever seen that have actually come from England/Britain and had Anglo-Saxon origins. Also, I wouldn't count the French names as being smooshed the way "MacDonald" is, as French does that all the time with regular words and phrases anyway; it's not a change in grammar for the sake of nomenclature, it's nomenclature that follows the same rules of grammar as the rest of the language (de la Rosa, for instance, is similarly proper grammar in Spanish regardless of whether you are using it as a name or in a sentence - with each word being seperated). French names are still seperated into seperate words in the way the grammar of the language dictates; "Le'Blanc" means "The White" regardless of whether it's a surname or in a sentence in the title of a book. Runa27 20:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
As a Brazilian I have to correct some of the information presented in the main article. First of all, in Brazil the language spoken is Portuguese (not Spanish). Therefore, DC's character "Fire" could never has Beatriz Bonilla da Costa as her name . Although "Costa" is a common name , "Bonilla" is not.Actually, it's a Spanish family name. The last point is that "Da Costa" is not a family name. "Costa" it is. But "Da" is not the correct written form of this nomenclature in the Portguese language. The real correct way to write such nomenclature would be "da". So, this shows how little writers know about the culture of the characters' countries that they created.
--- I deleted this nonsense: "Another point to consider, is the fact that Brazillians don't use their father's last name as their own, they use their mother's; so da Costa should actually be his mother's last name, and not his father's, although it is quite possible that they both had the same last name, even if they weren't related, as da Costa is a common surname in Brazil." It's just plain wrong. Simply read the Portuguese names article. One's last surname, in Brazil, is almost always the father's last name. If "Roberto da Costa" is his full name, almost certainly both his parents had the common "da Costa" surname; it could also have a middle surname from his mother (who had addopted his husband last name after marriage) yet to be revealed. 200.255.9.38 18:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Yes, the World Trade Center
Was Sunspot involved when Juggernaut and Black Tom attacked and partially destroyed parts of the World Trade Center? I know, I know, but it was a very, very confusing story.
Lots42 15:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Marfan027sun.jpg
Image:Marfan027sun.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
