User talk:Shalom Yechiel/Archives/March 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your report about Suhayl Saadi at Conflict of Interest Noticeboard
Please see the recent comment I added there. I believe the next step is for someone to carefully go through all the provided links to be sure they are legit. if you have other steps to suggest, you are welcome to add to the discussion at WP:COI/N. EdJohnston 00:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
YechielMan, I took this article under my wing—please let me know if you approve of the result. The COI/N discussion is in that noticeboard's Archive 4. — Athænara ✉ 08:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for your support on my RfA. It passed with 55/0/0. I'll try my best to be worthy of the trust the community has put in me. If there are any of my actions you have a problem with or a question about, please feel free to discuss this with me and if needed to revert me. If there is anything else I can help you with (backlogs, comments, ...), you can always contact me on my talk page. Fram 14:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Closing AfDs
You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Viris Illustribus (Jerome) correctly as a speedy keep, but you also need to take the AfD notice off the article in question. Don't worry I tidied up after you ;) Have fun. --Steve (Slf67) talk 08:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Shaare Zedek
Fair enough, I probably should've done a more extensive search before moving the article, I figured the creator just wasn't a Hebrew speaker and therefore used a wrong transliteration. Thanks for the correction, Yonatan talk 06:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Rhode Island governors
I intend to add content to the articles. I thought it would be useful to add the template at least, so that people can click through the links from governor to governor, including me as I work on them. Logophile 20:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Shiny disco balls
It's a really terrible song, which was played over and over at this party I was at the other night, so now it's firmly stuck in my head. :p – Riana shiny disco balls 03:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Reply to user:Seicer
Thanks for the review, it was very helpful and much appreciated! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Editor review/RHB
Replied. Thanks, RHB Talk - Edits 22:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Equalizer Cheat Code Cartridge
The article tells about the item, lists it's function, and tells how it compares and contrasts with other similar devises, some Wikipedians, just love to delete others work without them caring if it's there or not. Poor Wikipedians they need to remove the only reference that can be found online for this item. (Floppydog66 07:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC))
My Editor Review
Thanks! I did have editcountitis! Recently I've been trying to figure things out, but now I think that I've got the ropes and will try to make more contributions to mainspace articles. Thanks for the wikiknome fix. And its ShakingSpirit not Shining Spirit. No problem though. Now, what do I know about... RedSkunktalk 21:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:Who is essjay (I read in the newspaper a bit about him), thats why I don't know much
Firstly may I know the coment made by him.
You only told that Essjay was one of the most outstanding users, an administrator and a checkuser. But Wikipedia has no right to interfare in his personal matters as long as he is not comenting on matters that may obstruct the unity of WP organisation or national integrity. If he was an outstanding user then why did jimmy asked him to resign. He was doing his job nicely. Thanks Sushant gupta 05:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, would you be my friend? Sushant gupta 06:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wait a minute are you thinking that am I a fraud. Hey dude, I am just a 15 years old kid. I just simply asked you for friendship man. Well if you don't trust me then its fine. My well wishes Sushant gupta 07:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I am sorry, I read your previous message wrong way. Actually when I read it quite hastily then it seemed to me different. Sushant gupta 07:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wait a minute are you thinking that am I a fraud. Hey dude, I am just a 15 years old kid. I just simply asked you for friendship man. Well if you don't trust me then its fine. My well wishes Sushant gupta 07:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
RFA
Thanks for your support of my RFA! It was successful, cheers! SGGH 20:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Editor Review
Thank you very much, Regards, --Wpktsfs 04:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Transformers
You added a flag to a recent article I began on the Transformers movie prequel Ghosts of Yesterday. I believe that there does need to be a page on this, as it is a very important aspect to the Transformers universe. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Transformers for an example of how large the Transformers universe already is on wikipedia. As there is a page devoted completely to the comic book prequel to the movie (which is not even completed) I see no reason why there should not be a page for this new novel, especially since it was written by Alan Dean Foster, who is himself, a rather well known author. --EndrilRM 19:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon[omg plz] 20:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank you for reviewing me, and even offering to possibly nominate me! Yes, I should probably be a bit more involved in XFDs, although I haven't been involved in much these days because I've been so busy. Anyway, have a great day. Cheers, Dar-Ape 01:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Signature
See "Teh". My uncommon usage of the article is on purpose. And also, sorry for whatever I did, I don't want any more trouble with jewish users, ok? --Teh Original Mr. Orange (Orange juice?) 03:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
What I mean by trouble with jewish users is this: [1] and this [2], not that jewish users give me trouble per se. I thought you were involved in the article "Settler colonialism" that brought me great trouble and harsh responses from jewish users. Since you are a jew, and I have been involved in a discussion today involving the Israeli-occupied territories and so forth, I thought you were addressing me because of that. I don't have problems with jews, and I don't want to have them, alright? --Teh Original Mr. Orange (Orange juice?) 03:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello? All clear? I'm sorry for the misunderstanding!! --Teh Original Mr. Orange (Orange juice?) 03:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you very much for your thoughtful review. You've given me some great advice. Verkhovensky 01:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Your reaction time is impressive
Whilst I was looking for the correct stub to add to the new John Veneman article I saw you had already added one 1 minute after I made the article. One of the things that make Wikipedia so great :-) --Lomedae 03:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hear hear! and Amen! I opened an article, three minutes later it was stubbed for me, and I was asked for sources! Shalom dude! Alastair Haines 16:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for the kind words you said in the review. :) --soum (0_o) 05:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Speedy deletes
Copying from another Wikipedia article is not grounds for a speedy delete. In fact, the reason I copied is because these current content was a great place to start working from. Right now I'm just doing macro-organization. I'll update specific pages later, and I'd like you to help.--Urthogie 06:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Fac time
I try to give each nom a minimum of 5 days. There is no hard upper limit as to how long one can take. Raul654 07:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Your review
Thanks for your editor review on me - it was nice to gain some positive feedback! I've taken in everything you have said, and hope I do well here :) --Spebi 10:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey
Hey Yechiel, sure, I'll have a look, but I hope you don't mind if I do so tomorrow - I'm just about to pack up and log out of this place for the night(/early early morning). I promise to have a look, and if you don't get an answer back from me by this time tomorrow, slap me! Cheers, – Riana talk 17:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hey again :) I read over your draft. I quite like the sound of your intentions, and your answers to the standard questions are strong. I would aim for a little more self-marketing in the nomination statement, though. For a lot of users, the tone of self noms is very important, and yours is just a tiny bit on the quiet, modest side. I'd go the whole hog and really brag about myself (which is why I didn't self nom, because I'd have nothing to talk about... ), no one minds a bit of assertiveness in the nom statement. Otherwise, it's all good. Let me know when it's live! :) Ask me if you have any more questions, and I'll try my best to answer them. Cheers, – Riana talk 05:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
re: RfA
please email me or enable an email address and let me know you've done so - NYC JD (interrogatories) 20:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
YechielMan, thank you very much for completing my editor review. I found your comments very helpful. --Bfissa 20:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
| Thanks for your support on my Request for adminship, which was successful, with votes of 49/0/0.
Lemme know if you need help on something I might know a little something about....(check my userpage). |
|
|---|---|
| cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 14:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
Killer whale FPC
Hello. A Featured Picture Candidate you commented on, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Killer whale mother and calf, is now in the section for "Older nominations requiring additional input from voters." Contributors have tried to improve it after you commented, and your opinion is welcome as to which, if any, of the available versions deserves promotion. I am sending this message to everyone who participated in the FPC. Thanks! Kla'quot 06:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Withdrawn RfA
Per [3], I withdrew your nomination. --Durin 14:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. YechielMan 14:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
My Editor Review
Thanks for your comprehensive review. I will sort out my user page as soon as I can, by adding the relevant sections. Thanks again --Agεθ020 (ΔT • ФC) 20:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for participating in my editor review! --Hemlock Martinis 00:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:
Thanks not sure what I did though, mind fixing it? please. Lakers 02:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ah I got it thanks for reminding me :-) Lakers 02:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Chris Hamrick
OK thanks much. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.138.41.54 (talk) 03:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
DYK
Thankyou YechielMan. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Probably not the most appropriate BS to pick for this situation
| The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
| "...because [your] contributions to this project endure regardless of how others perceive them," which is truly respectable, and not merely to make a point about the arbitrariness of barnstars. –Pomte 13:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
Your edit to List of Spectrobes
Your recent edit to List of Spectrobes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- For the record, I was reverting multiple vandalism edits, and I apparently missed some of it. I did not write the vandalism shown in the diff. YechielMan 17:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
On Michael Fishman
Yes I reverted then had to again because popups couldn't revert that many vandalisms. I googled it will give it an IMDB link now. Thanks.--Paloma Walker 17:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[Response to my request that User:Perversedork change his name]
Perverse: deffinition: From Microsoft Word dictionary:1)purposely deviating from what is accepted as good, proper, or reasonable
2)unreasonably stubborn, contrary, or awkward
3)willfully persisting in what is wrong
4)perverted
The Oxford Pocket Dictionary of Current English: per·verse / pərˈvərs/ • adj. (of a person or their actions) 1)showing a deliberate and obstinate desire to behave in a way that is unreasonable or unacceptable, often in spite of the consequence 2)contrary to the accepted or expected standard or practice: in two general elections the outcome was quite perverse. 3)Law (of a verdict) against the weight of evidence or the direction of the judge on a point of law. 4)sexually perverted.
there is more than one deffinition for a word, maybe you should not make assumptions about people. It bothers me that you would send me a message attacking my username when it is a very unimportant part of this website.
I use this username because it is my username for everything. i would rather just have one universal username than have to memorize a bunch of different ones and some of my old usernames are up to 4 years old, so i don't really feel like changing all of my usernames because people may have a problem with it. You are the first person who it has ever bothered... so i am sorry if you are bothered by it but you shouldn't judge someone by a name.
Review
Since you were the first Wikipedian to give me a review, I feel arbitrarily obligated to ask you to review me, again. (The hyperlink is the tilde in my sig, just to let you know ;-) ~Steptrip 01:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was feeling that way about vandal-patrol, however, I recently downloaded AWB and I mainly do categorization while using that program. Thanks for the reference to the helping at the help desk nonetheless. ~Steptrip 01:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thanks
Thanks for the DIY! Bms4880 18:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
My Rfa
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. --Anthony.bradbury 21:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

