User talk:Saudi9999

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Guti.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Guti.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Coppacampioni.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Coppacampioni.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 05:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to UEFA Champions League 2007-08. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. GDonato (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

>> I'm sorry - taht was by mistake

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Coppacampioni.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Coppacampioni.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to UEFA Cup records and statistics, you will be blocked from editing. ChrisLamb 15:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Real Madrid 2007/08

I'm sorry I changed the lower team to the appropiate reserve club, but i didn't see your footnote nor was I able to change it Raul17 18:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Need your expert advise

Hello! I hope you are feeling great. I would like you to view my comments here. Your thoughts on this matter is needed here. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 10:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for your comments. I have fixed ALL the La Liga pages to be in line with the Premier League football article titles. Anyway, your comments on this page would be much appreciated as well. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 13:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Realmadridcrest.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Realmadridcrest.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Redirect of Derby madrileño

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Derby madrileño, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Derby madrileño is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Derby madrileño, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Manual of Style for club season articles

As you have often contribute to club season articles, I believe this and this are pretty much of your interest.--ClaudioMB 15:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:RMkit1902.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:RMkit1902.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Richest football clubs

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Richest football clubs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. -Toon⁰⁵ 16:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Real Madrid

Thanks for your work on Real Madrid. But, when you add a reference, can you make sure the title of it is in line with that of the website being sourced? Cheers, Mattythewhite 19:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IP user on Real Madrid

I hardly understand the message you left me on my talkpage, in any case every user is eligible to leave his comment on a request for deletion, including anonymous users (with the only exception of banned users and sockpuppeteers, but this is not the case). The IP user who commented on the AFD seems actually to be User:Hadrianos1990 (at least that's what I'd say, given his past history and the IP's recent contributions), but this does not forbid him to contribute without being logged. I hope you understand. --Angelo 01:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AC Milan 06/07

My opinion on football club seasons is evidenced by a MOS draft for club season articles I created following suggestion by the WikiProject Football guys. This article is an implementation of the draft. In short, keep it simple and short: matches shouldn't stay there, and should instead be replaced by links to external reliable reports where available. --Angelo 19:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Real Madrid matches

Please do not recreate material which was deleted by an WP:AfD discussion. Even if you do it in a different location, it will be deleted immediately. Thanks, пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Fb report3

About the test you've asked me to comment about: {{Fb report3}} was not finished (I should have placed it in another folder) and it has a technical problem, each team's fact is an individual parameter, making necessary to use more #if: then Wikipedia engine could support. So, we should use a single parameter for the facts. By the way, {{Fb report}} uses #if: in the limit, I will change it in the future. There is another advantage for using a single parameter, the lines are closer, making it a better looking table.

I've created {{Fb cm3 match}} and {{Fb report 2t}}. {{Fb cm3 match}} could be the replacement for {{Fb cm match}}. The advantage of {{Fb cm3 match}} is that it could use any type of report in Report column (using the new rep parameter), making it more flexible. {{Fb report 2t}} uses one parameter for all facts of one team. Also, the visual is a bit different.

I hope that is something we could use as start and improved it. Remember that we could start to use as soon as wanted in articles and improve the template later. Please, tell me what do you think.

--ClaudioMB 00:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Now, I will use it, so if there any changing notice me.--Saudi⁹⁹⁹⁹ 04:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Do you know any template to easily enter the zone time like: {{Zonetime|19:45|WEST}}? If there isn't it, maybe we should created. What do you think?--ClaudioMB 00:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. I have 2 questions. mofm, for me, means a player for either teams. Should be changed or created another one to be only one team's mofm and show that in the description of the information? (like Real Madrid man of the match). Second, the parameters are ht (home team), at (away team), htf (home team fatcs) and atf (away team facts). Should be changed for lt (left team), rt (right team), ltf (left team's facts) and rtf (right team's facts)?--ClaudioMB 03:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

O.K. but about mofm , it uses with UEFA Champions League (each match has mofm on match's report from UEFA.com). So, I mean mofm for all team but I will use mofm for my team (like Real madrid) on La Liga matches only.

For second question, that will be good and easy if the match in neutral place.Saudi⁹⁹⁹⁹ 04:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The idea to use left and right team in that kind of table, is to keep the article's team always in the left side (Real Madrid always left), like the score column.--ClaudioMB 19:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ecf1998.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecf1998.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ecf1998.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecf1998.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:La Liga seasons

Template:La Liga seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — PeeJay 14:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I notice you removed the images from that template. Just so you know, I doubt that will save it from deletion, as it has been made largely redundant by Template:Primera División de España. - PeeJay 17:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] [Raul goals in Spanish cup]

Stop editing the raul's statistics in Spanish cup. He scored 15 goals in 33 matchs. realmadrid.com messed up his stats because of people here who put 20 goals in 37 matchs while it was false. I can discuss this in "discussion" in the raul page but stop editing it. I'm a raul's fan and i can tell you all his goals and matchs in Spanish cup if you want. Could you ?. I sent a message to realmadrid.com to edit their mistake.

[edit] Undo of edits to the Real Medrid infobox

Hi,

You recently reverted a bunch of changes I'd made to the Real Madrid infobox. You did not provide any edit summary explaining why, and I can't see any reason for doing so, so I've undone this. Can you explain why you made these changes? Chris Cunningham (talk) 15:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Real Madrid C.F. 2007-08 season/Start formation

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Real Madrid C.F. 2007-08 season/Start formation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Uefa Cup survey

Hi, my friend!

I recently saw the survey and I voted as you think how I could have voted... This articles -as Fadiga wants to figure- are totally laughable and not serious.

Thank you, and we are togheter in the "fight"! --Ultracanalla (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi!

I don´t know how to report them in this wikipedia. I´m from Argentina, and I know the rules of the spanish language wikipedia, but not this... I think, as you, that those useres are -at least- suspicious... ¿Can they vote, being new in this wikipedia? In the spanish users must do at least 100 editions to be allowed to vote!

My regards, --Ultracanalla (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring on UEFA Cup related articles

Please stop edit warring on articles such as UEFA Cup finals. Two users have received blocks for their part in that edit war in recent days, and I recommend that you do not perpetuate it unless you wish to join them. Oldelpaso (talk) 19:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on UEFA Cup. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 14:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on UEFA Cup. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Jehochman ^Talk 18:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Real Madrid criticism

Just to clarify things a little, Manchester United have criticised Real Madrid directly, and they have threatened to report Real Madrid to FIFA. This is nothing to do with the press, but a response to comments made by Real Madrid.Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I wanna give you a prize

I'm Javitomad, a Spanish user of English wikipedia.

I've seen you've improved some articles about Spain.

Because of that, I want to give you a Barnstar, the Spanish Barnstar.

I, Javitomad, give you this Barnstar for contributing for a better Spanish-English Wikipedia. May 31st, 2008.

Javitomad (...tell me...) 02:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Real Madrid Supporters

Unfortunately sections of the Real Madrid support have been guilty of racist abuse, just because you dislike this fact does not mean you have the right to prevent other people from knowing it. The material I added was well sourced and accurate. If you have a problem with it please add sources that show the pictures showing Real Madrid supporters holding fascistic banners to be false. StreebGreebling (talk) 21:24, 03 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, that's not important to me because many teams did that, so your words about me are not right. Maybe you don't like RM fans :(!!. Sorry!. --Saudi⁹⁹⁹⁹ 22:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Correct, many teams do have racist sections of their support and many worse than Madrid, though Madrid have been involved in several high profile incidents of racial abuse in the past few years and that is worthy of inclusion. I don't have any problem with Mardid fans in general, but based on the fact that the Ultras have a racist element to their support I do have a problem with them and if you dislike racism that is a completely logical position to take. I have no problem with you, but in future please don't remove legitimate criticism from articles.StreebGreebling (talk) 10:18, 04 June 2008 (UTC)