Talk:Salvation Run

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance. Related task forces (publisher): DC Comics work group

[edit] Primary Sources

I must confess I'm a bit confused about the "no primary sources" guideline as it applies to fiction. It seems to me that in presenting factual information (not thematic analysis or criticism) -- things like "The story shows super-villains exiled to an alien world" -- it should be sufficient to cite the book. It's certainly verifiable: all someone has to do is locate a copy and read it. The idea that a third-party publication is a more reliable reference than the book itself seems to violate common sense. It's apparently sufficient to cite a written account of a real event, but not a written account of a fictional event? --Kelson (talk) 20:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

It's the thematic analysis or criticism that is lacking in this article. Pairadox (talk) 00:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Status of Gorilla Grodd

Okay, enough with this edit war stuff. we have topick a status and stick to it. I don't know how things are done on Wiki entries on comics, so enlighten me and the rest of us as to how a situation like this, a character who's death is questionable, is to be handled. InsaneZeroG (talk) 17:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Gorilla Grodd has been solicited as returning in the The Flash #240. http://www.dccomics.com/comics/?cm=9334 Monkey-Boy (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)