User talk:Resolute/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gomes Elementary School

Please reexamine the page for Gomes Elementary School. I believe that this article now has proper assertion of notability, as well as other useful details which have all been clearly referenced. Thank You. Sukh17 20:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Pacer Stacktrain

Hi, I updated Pacer Stacktrain. Can you give it some more time for people to help improve it? Thanks. 69.141.232.16 06:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Peter Maher

Maher isn't in the HHOF. It's that simple. You way wish that he was, you may want to write a letter to the HHOF asking him to be inducted, you may think it's a travesty that he isn't ... none of which changes the fact that he is not in the HHOF. If you want to change the section header so that it would include people other than HHOF inductees, then that's something you can discuss with the Wikipedia community (or just make the changes and see if anyone challenges them). But as it is, the section is for hall of famers, and your personal opinion that someone who received an award from the HHOF should also be included is just that -- your personal opinion -- and not something you should try to pass as fact or as a consensus reached by the Wikipedians. --Walor 17:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD on reality nobodies

I saw your AfD on the Rikers, and would appreciate your vote on the following articles, which are also about reality tv non-entities.

Leonid the Magnificent , Rappin' Granny, Tyler MacNiven,Sarah Reinertsen,Ron Young,Kandice Pelletier, Alison Irwin,Fred Holliday,Kendra Bentley, Tyler Denk & James Branaman. All the best & thanks --MacRusgail 03:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion on Cena and Michaels

Should I remove my standard deletion tag? BuyAMountain 06:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

NHL season template

Hi! I was wondering if you could possibly make the conferance syntax optional or add a league syntax. I tried to add this template to a non NHL team season page but it didn't display league. With a league syntax this template could be used for many more leagues and former leagues as the WHA. Thanks. --Krm500 14:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. I don't want to make that template overly large or complex (moreso than it already is), so it might be best to copy it to a new template, remove the NHL specific stuff and add in more general syntax for a wider variety of leagues. Resolute 16:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I have the template in my sandbox. --Krm500 17:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, the in the header to the onfobox the 2006-07 is linked to the 2006-07 NHL season. Is it possible to remove that link when used in a non NHL teams seasons page? --Krm500 17:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Try using this modified version of the template: Template:IcehockeyTeamSeason. If there is anything else that needs adding or changing, feel free to mention it on my talk page, or on the talk page for this template. Resolute 18:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! --Krm500 18:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

pawgabr's response

what's so wrong about my dion phaneuf picture? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pawgabr (talk • contribs).

Aside from the fact that you very clearly did not create that image, thus have an invalid claim to release it to the public domain, you have uploaded it as a means to disparage the subject, as confirmed by your other edits. I would suggest that you read Wikipedia's policies on vandalism, and look to add constructively to the project, rather than destructively. Resolute 06:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I took this picture from a public domain, I feel that you violated my publishing right plus the picture isn't really destructive, it shows off phaneuf's great skating skill.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pawgabr (talk • contribs).

The internet is not public domain. Please read Wikipedia's fair use policy, specifically point nine under the "counterexamples" section. Also, please sign your posts using for tildes ((~~~~)), it helps identify who is leaving the messages. Thank you. Resolute 06:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Ultimate X-Men (story arcs): Peer Review

Greetings! In December of 2006, you participated in the discussion for the 2nd deletion nomination of Ultimate X-Men (story arcs). After two months of rewriting, reorganizing, and referencing, the article is now undergoing a WikiProject Comics peer review. Your editorial opinion would be most welcome to help us improve the article to A-class status. Thanks for your time! - fmmarianicolon | Talk 06:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Unnecessary?

I was wondering why I was sent a message regarding "vandalism" on the Calgary Flames entry. If you ACTUALLY took the time to check the history and contributions from me, you'd see that I was attempting to REMOVE vandalism and keep things from getting out of hand, but whatever. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrkurto (talk • contribs) 06:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC).

Oh... crap. I tagged the wrong person. My aplogies. Resolute 15:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

Hi Resolute, please make sure you warn article creators when you tag pages for speedy deletion. It takes only a few extra seconds and is the proper courtesy to extend to the article creator, who can argue their case for keeping the article. I notice you did not do this for Disaster and Despair. While I agree this is an easy {{db-band}}, we have to give people a chance. Thanks, and keep up the good work, – Riana _ऋ 05:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Pokeman image deletion review

You recently voted on a templates for deletion discussion on Template:PokeImageNR and several other templates. The result was for deletion. The matter is now before deletion review. Please comment if you would like, one way or the other. The users of the Pokeman Wikiproject believe that their case was not fully heard the first time the matter was up for deletion. So please review the situation if you would like. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 21:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

NHLabbr Template

My apologies. I nominated the template, mainly upon the fact that when I did, it wasn't linked to much of anything. Now I can see how useful it really is, and I wanted to apologize for the nomination. Good job on the hard work, and I am thankful the voting process has obviously shown a keep on the template. Best, 23:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope

Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 23:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars

I'm adding to the article now. I should be done in a few hours. Can you please remove the speedy deletion tag? Thanks. Taric25 05:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

User:TTN now consideres the article for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Would you please take a look? Thanks! Taric25 05:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Please look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and cast your vote. Thanks! Taric25 06:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

2005-06 Calgary Flames season

I was just getting some work done on the corresponding Canucks season article by copying the Flames article and noticed something. On the player stats seciton, at the bottom of it is a list called All Traded Players. I just want to clarify what that represents. As I see it, it is the cumalative totals of all the players the Flames traded over the season. Thanks. Kaiser matias 04:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that is what it represents. I've been using the Flames Media Guide as my primary source for the player stats, and it piles all of the departed players together into the All Traded Players category. I may expand that later, but for now felt that was adequate. Resolute 13:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

National Hockey League rules

I may need your help in National Hockey League rules in regarding spelling changes. Regards, -- Jeff3000 02:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on it. Resolute 13:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Camrose

Good call... I was debating about reverting that... but I was worried about causing an edit war with an anon. Was gonna wait until the RBC was over so I wouldn't get any reaction... btw... the RBC has caused a fair share of vandalism at the Selkirk Steelers article... only once since I started watching about 4 days ago... but it was so bad before that that it almost got speedied. DMighton 02:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tsc logo phone.gif

Hello Resolute, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Tsc logo phone.gif) was found at the following location: User:Resolute/TSC. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tscscreen.JPG

Hello Resolute, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Tscscreen.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Resolute/TSC. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV Request

Thank you for making a report about Me7891 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. I think you might have reported a different user. I saw no extensive vandalism by Me7891 -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 02:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

St. Louis Blues Conf. Titles

Ahh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up, I thought people were changing it just to vandalize. Sorry for my ignorance on the topic, and glad you could clear it up for me in a respectable kind manner. Thanks again. ^{Erryday I'm} 19:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars

I need some help creating the section for Creatures and races. Do you think you could help? Thanks in advance! Taric25 16:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Ramsay Arbuthnot

Hi- could you take a look at the further info I have added here as it may change your stance? Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 01:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry to bother you again but an incorrect impression may have been given by some users about the importance of the role of ADC to the King so if you can chevk you still agree with keeping I'd be grateful. Thanks ! Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I gathered the role wasn't of key importance, as there would otherwise be a greater number of biographies to draw from if he was an important member of the Kings council. In this case, this Arbuthnot seems to barely gain notability via quantity of achievements rather than the quality of them. He's a marginal keep at best, but I don't feel terribly inclined to change my vote again on this AfD. Thanks, Resolute 13:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I'd appreciate an acknowledgement.

Greetings, you raised a concern on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walid Said Bin Said Zaid. I replied by trying to draw your attention to a reply I drafted the last time I was asked this question, here.

• I'd be very grateful if you would acknowledge you were aware I replied to your concern.
• I'd be very grateful if you told me whether you took the time to read my reply to the concern you raised.
• And I would be very grateful if you let me know whether you formed your opinion of the article after reading the ten factors for and against Said Zaid's continued detention.

Cheers! Geo Swan 06:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I have read your argument, and no, I still do not find it changes my mind. I did not define what type of prisoner Walid Said Bin Said Zaid was, I stated that simply being a prisoner is no sign of notability. Only the lead statement of that article is about Walid, the rest of the article reads like an essay that has questionable relevance in a biography. IMO, there is no assertion of notability for this individual, thus I maintain my delete vote. Regards, Resolute 13:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Gandaragandara has been up to his vandalism tricks again (Nashville Predators this time). Thought I would give you a heads up. Ccrashh 21:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

So I noticed. I reported him to WP:AIV, that account has been blocked indefinitely. Resolute 21:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lethbridgehurricanes.GIF

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lethbridgehurricanes.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

CHL Awards

Thanks for uploading all the great pictures of the CHL trophies. I wish the OHL would allow easier access to its trophies for similar photos. Flibirigit 17:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I was actually quite disappointed that the WHL didn't have very many of their own trophies available. The CHL certainly put up an impressive display in Vancouver, however. Resolute 18:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hockey team season templates

All 3 restored, thanks for letting me know. NawlinWiki 19:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Mike Keenan

Yeah, Keenan has virtually ruined every team he has been a part of. It's a shame the flames will have to suffer through him like my precious Canucks did. Anyways, I read the TSN article wrong (my bad), I thought it stated that he was officially hired by the Flames. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Thricecube 05:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Signing

Hahaha, best user page signing ever, man. I must say I laughed pretty hard internally... Oh yeah I have no idea what your Flames are doing with Keenan... since Huselius is gonna be useless for them now, I personally think a trade to the Leafs for a bag of pucks would be really useful. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 04:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Given the most valuable trading asset the Leafs have is a bag of pucks, I can understand that offer, heh. Both Juice and Keenan are saying the right things, but it should be interesting. Glad you enjoyed the comment. Resolute 05:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

1988-89 Calgary Flames season

On 21 June 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1988-89 Calgary Flames season, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 19:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats, Resolute! Skudrafan1 21:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Montreal Expos merge tag

Hi. I have restored the merge tag. Although I personally do not favour the proposed merge, a merge has been proposed, and the discussion is ongoing. The tag does not mean that there is consensus for a merge, simply that a merge has been proposed. As per WP:MERGE, the use of the tag is appropriate. Given the many many times this issue has been raised over the past few years, and the numerous editors who have spoken in favour of the merger in the past, it is premature to state at this stage that there is "[c]learly no consensus for a merge", especially since the merger was proposed less than a week ago. This is not a WP:SNOW situation, and the use of the merge tag does not depend on the state of the discussion on the talk page. The tag should be removed when the discussion has been closed (which I hope will be, mercifully, soon). Skeezix1000 17:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I guess I would just add this: as you can see Talk:Montreal Expos#Previous merge discussions, this debate has been going in mind-numbing circles for a few years now, despite the clear consensus in the 2005 AfD discussion. Let's just do this current debate properly -- give notice, allow for proper consultation -- so that at the end, assuming that the consensus is to maintain the separate Expos article (which I assume it will), we can have some degree of finality to this debate. We can't stop people from raising the issue again in the future, but at least then we would have two formal processes (one AfD, one Merge), both of which rejected a merge, that we could point to. Skeezix1000 18:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Got your comment. Thanks. I know what you're saying. WalterWalnuts, or whatever his name is, has rubbed me the wrong way, especially his comments along the line of "I am going to fight this until the page gets merged". But, to be fair, he is (now) proposing something different than the 2005 AfD, and all the talk page comments since 2005 suggest that he is not the only user who feels a merger is appropriate. I'm tired of this debate, esp. when the arguments in favour of the merger are so ridiculous, so I agree that it does seem a bit abusive to be raising it AGAIN. But let it play out, let's get the consensus we need, and then it will be much easier dealing with the WalterWalnuts of the future. Skeezix1000 19:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

It's been more than a week, and as you predicted, there is clearly no consensus for a merge. Can you think of an editor that we could call on (who has not participated in the discussion) to step in and close the discussion? Skeezix1000 13:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Current news

Is this something that was reached at WP:HOCKEY? I remember being told that all of them should be hidden till the season starts or at least till we're close to the season starting (excluding draft and the such). Or is this something that you see as being part of the season where as some of the other editors don't agree. I really don't care that much either way, only reason I hid it was because most of the other teams have it hidden as well. Bringing this up at WP:HOCKEY probably isn't a good idea right now, anyway...still some stuff that needs to be settled that it seems hasn't been, or it's at least not clear. Also, do you mind if I make some edits at List of Calgary Flames players? I know you're currently working on it and some editors extrememly dis-like when people come in and do something to a work-in-progress, so I figured I'd ask first. I'll try to do it at times where an edit conflict will definitely not occur, if that's alright with you. Bsroiaadn^Talk 05:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

If there was a discussion, I haven't seen it either...I just assumed when I was told and when people went through hiding them that there was one and I was too busy to check at the time. And nah, I'll leave it, that reason does make a lot of sense. Alright, thanks. I know how that is, man. I hope everything works out and goes well, or as well as it can go. Bsroiaadn^Talk 06:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Page moving

Thanks for the help with the page moving back. — Moe ε 18:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Montrealcanadienslogo1920.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Montrealcanadienslogo1920.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 00:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for the help with the csd tag on the Human Security Act: Wishlist page. I am a little new to tagging for deletion, and was afraid for a moment there I may have incorectly tagged a legitamate page. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the CSD#R1 lesson!

Thanks, I didn't realize there was a CSD for that. I'd somewhat given up on speedying anything, as the criteria are so darn narrow. But that is a good one to know! Thanks! --Jaysweet 20:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

oops

Criteria for speedy deletion/Analysis1 -- Yes it should have been in WP space. I'll check it's deleted and make it over again. It's for a project at WP:CSD to see what sort of articles are actually being speedy deleted. Everyone talks about it, but nobody actually has data. Thanks. And, while I was making mistakes, I made another & put this on your user page instead of here, --as you can see, I've moved it where it belongs. DGG (talk) 16:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Pie76

Hahaha, thanks man. This guy has been blocked (on multiple accounts) so many times, I don't know why he bothers. During this past week alone it's been about 2 accounts that have been indefinitely blocked. I would report him right now, but I'm waiting for him to edit Rush again so I have more solid proof than the just John Bonham article. Though if he doesn't do it soon I might just go ahead and do it anyway. Bsroiaadn^Talk 01:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Ben Avraham Nhamani

Thanks for fixing the Ben Avraham Nhamani AFD.

My bad. --Amir E. Aharoni 13:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

1812 in popular culture

Hi, Resolute. Sorry for reposting the article, I was completely unaware of the debate and deletion. Thanks. DagosNavy 11:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Just to Let You Know

I'm a newpage army, okay. GoldEmerald 11:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Yawn. Resolute 13:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Hart Trophy

In response to your suggestion, I have added as many free use images of the winners as I could find. Although I added a few too many and I'll have to remove about four. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 02:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

list of baseball-related deletions

Noticed your vote earlier. There are other Afd debates there, where minor leaguers are nominated for deletion.--Truest blue 23:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello WikiProject Ice Hockey/Participant

I am an advisor to the National Hockey League. With your help over the next few months I plan to review and correct any information on wikipedia relating to the National Hockey League, its franchises, players, executives and partership organisations. I am here to provide you with information. Your work is appreciated. --NHLsource 18:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Adminship

Hey Resolute, I have a question for you. Are you interested in becoming an administrator? I see no reason why you wouldn't make it (in case you didn't know I am one), you've been here almost as long as I have... you've got the good edit count in all the right places, and I've never noticed you being uncivil. Let me know if your interested and I'll put forward a nomination for you. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 23:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Alright, well I'll try and get that nomination in sometime tomorrow afternoon, I don't think i'll be able to get any kind of decent nom done in time tonight as I should pack it in soon, but good to know your interested and we'll see how you do. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 00:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 19:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Good answers, I think the nom looks good and I would be utterly shocked if you aren't accepted. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 21:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey no problem at all, you deserve it... successful RFA's make you feel the best about editing on Wikipedia... and you answered all your questions well and no one has dug up any dirt on you as of yet (which is impressive, because there are a few voters who are like sharks, they just pounce on the worst of the people), but I don't think they'll find anything. Cheers from Ontario, mate! Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 01:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Hahahahah, street cred, that's brilliant! It'll probably rank somewhere in the middle of my top ten for my upcoming BLOW list.... Best Laughs on Wikipedia. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 00:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

RFA

Congratulations! You are close to becoming an administrator. You have a lot of support and little or no opposition!

I did add a question. If you answer this well, this can only help more flock to you and support you! You don't need me to help you answer it but if you really want possible answers, just ask me. WKPDX 02:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Recently, you said that this material should be Speedily deleted here. However, an editor has come along, removed the copyright violations, sourced the article, and reduced to a stub. As such, your further input, considering the changes, would be highly valued, and your comment on whether you endorse his motion to close the debate or not would also be excellent. Regards -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 09:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks anyway, but it has been decided that, since the copvio has been removed, the article should not be deleted. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 22:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. I would have happily withdrawn my !vote had the AfD not already been closed. Cheers, Resolute 06:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

National Hockey League awards

Hi, I noticed that you will be working on National Hockey League awards, which will be tricky. I think it would be best to turn it into a chart because it is MUCH easier to pass an FL than an FA. It also wouldn't hurt to include an image of each trophy (you can make an image column on a chart, like this). Either way, it's your call. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, as part of another FT I'm working on, someone (not me) made this page, which summarizes the topic and is a current FLC (I think it is heading towards a pass) so you could start with that and make the columns: Award/Trophy, Criteria, Year it was first awarded (better title needed), Recent Winner(s). The images are optional, but in the WWE champions page, it used to have an image of each champion, but somebody in the FLC requested that they be remove. So, perhaps it would be best to avoid the individual images. Again, it's your call. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

my mistake

my mistake thanksApelike 15:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA was successful

Congratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Good luck! --Deskana (banana) 20:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! -- JamesTeterenko 21:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Wohoo! so many new buttons! Thanks to everyone who supported me. :o) Resolute 21:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!! Maxim_(talk) 22:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Congrats Resolute, didn't I say you'd be a shoo-in? If you feel like showing off your sysop status, go down to the WikiProject Participants section and put the qualification beside your name. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 22:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! Now, get to work! :) Jmlk17 22:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

<whimpers> Resolute 22:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

CongratsPolitics rule 00:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Way to go dude. I knew you would be an admin when I first saw you years ago. Actually think I thought you were back then. --Djsasso 00:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Rock on! Now get the mop and start working! --Hirohisat ^Talk 00:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations. I know I didn't vote (too lazy), but best of luck and use the mop well. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 03:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

• • Start the conga-ratulations line. See your first talk below! LOL :-). Flibirigit 17:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Scarborough Van Assembly

I am reverting copyright violations and non-free use of photos at the Scarborough Van Assembly article. Would you please review? Thanks. Flibirigit 16:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion log history

Hey Resolute!

I was perusing your deletion logs, and you're doing a fine job in deleting speedy pages. The only thing that I'd advise you on is to fill in the deletion summary with more than just what's automatically in the box for speedy pages. The reason for this is that you may accidentally leave the text of a copyright vio or an attack page in the deletion summary and thus in the deletion log. Only a dev can alter the deletion log, so it's better safe than sorry and now's the time to start building good habits. There are a couple scripts available that'll provide a drop down summary option.

Keep up the good work! Keegan^talk 04:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Archiving request

Hi! I'm one of the WP:HOCKEY/SWEDEN editors.

Firstly, just wanted to say grats to the adminship (is it a cyberspaceship?). Respect. :)

Also, I would like to politely request - you or someone else more experienced than me - to create Archive13 for WT:HOCKEY (or Archive14 if the project is superstitious). Talkpage has grown a lot since last time (see table. I know how to do tables anyway...) and I guess some old topics should be cleaned at least when talkpage is twice the size of its largest archive page. I would do the process myself, but I'm not really sure how just yet, and the talk page is getting painfully slow on my old system. Didn't really want to post this to the project talkpage itself. Whenever you have the time. Or, forward it to someone else if not. And thanks, either way!

Humbly,
-- Bamsefar75 00:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Well done. :) I noticed that IrisKawling had added more to Archive12 despite the latest page being Archive14. I think I managed to move it to Archive14 instead where it chronologically belongs. --Bamsefar75 16:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Woodland Stewards Article

In response to your note regarding the lack of notability, in comparing the article to others of a similar nature, I noticed there appeared to be no such information within those articles. How do I establish the needed notability within the article?

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcoyle (talk • contribs)

The Puppetmastaz

Why, instead of speedy deleting "The Puppetmastaz" stub, didn't you just drop a warning on my talk page, and then delete it in... say two days instead of the few hours when I was sleeping ? The band is very notable, in fact I wrote the stub because of an article in a nationwide newspaper in my country (France) that mentionned them as very notable, which hardily seems the case for all obscure bands mentionned in wikipedia ... So, please indicate me how I should recreate the page to conform with wikipedia's policy because I am a bit puzzled. Pointing to a verifiable source on why they are notable directly in the first revision would be enough or not ? Please answer on my own talk page, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donvinzk (talk • contribs) 05:41, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

I do not want to engage in a long discussion about the functionning of Wikipedia since you are more an expert than me on the matter. However, may I point out that the introduction of the Criteria Policy for Speedy Deletion" page you cited mention: "Before nominating an article for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved or reduced to a stub; if so, speedy deletion is probably inappropriate. Contributors sometimes create articles over several edits, so try to avoid deleting a page too soon after its creation if it appears incomplete. Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criteria the page meets, and consider notifying the page's creator.". None of which you have done, have you ? Plus, I am not creating a page about the minor band in the neighbourhood: the german wikipedia already as a page on them. Your doubts about the incompleteness of my articles were funded (hence the stub tag), and I thank you for pointing on them. I will adress the issues so the article may have a clean start. Donvinzk 08:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (talk • contribs)

Brainwashing 101

As you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainwashing 101, I am notifying you of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainwashing 101 (2nd nomination). - Crockspot 05:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion request

Greetings Sir,

Can you please help me delete my archives 1, 3, 5, and 7 for me?

Thankyou. --Jose77 23:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Done! Resolute 23:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

You are Great! --Jose77 23:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Social entropy++

Since you nuked this article, mind getting the redirect as well? Q ^{T C} 05:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Zeitgeist

Why was the Zeigeist page deleted? I don't understand why we cannot have an article on that conspiracy movie on wikipedia.

Thanks Sandwich Eater 12:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I see another user has already explained the situation. Resolute 14:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)