User talk:Rambam rashi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Rambam rashi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Firsfron of Ronchester 18:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] To hell in a handbasket

A tag has been placed on To hell in a handbasket, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ozgod 02:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] To hell in a handbasket

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article To hell in a handbasket, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J Milburn 16:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Int Eng Am Eng spelling

Please read wiki policy regarding Int Eng vs Am Eng spelling. Spelling should be left as is unless there is reason to change. --LiamE 00:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move from Mosque. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 23:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Varieties of English

You have been told about this above. Please do not make these changes without a good reason. Rich Farmbrough, 20:15 27 December 2007 (GMT).

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Breastfeeding. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lara❤Love 17:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inappropriate Moves/Naming

Please refrain from inappropriately moving articles like this, this, and this without first discussing on the talk page. The same goes for the naming conventions. Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Archaeology

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Archaeology, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The correct, accepted spelling is Archaeology. Geologyguy (talk) 23:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop changing the spelling of Archaeology. Geologyguy (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not move article names to variant spellings when the existing article name is widely accepted. Geologyguy (talk) 23:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Geologyguy (talk) 23:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Archeological theory. J.delanoygabsadds 23:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Archaeological theory, you will be blocked from editing. Your repeated disruptive edits against consensus, and after numerous warnings, constitute vandalism. Geologyguy (talk) 23:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Archaeological theory, you will be blocked from editing. Geologyguy (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours due to your history of disruptive page moves.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] WP:ENGVAR

Please, if you are tempted to change British to American spelling,(or vice versa) first read WP:ENGVAR. If a given article has used one variant of the English language, and there is no strong national tie to the subject, leave it in the established form. I undid your change of "behaviour" to "behavior" in Collective punishment because "behaviour" was first added 12 Feb 2007 [1]. I restored "archaeologists" and "aetiological" in the article Achor, where you have changed to non-British spelling, because the British spelling had been there since 30 Aug 2006 [2]. I undid your changes away from British spelling in Angelo (Shakespeare) because a Shakespeare play has strong ties to the British style of spelling, besides which British spelling had been used for "dishonour'd" since 20 February 2007, even though "behavior" was introduced at that same time. The national ties of the subject outweigh the occasional American spelling. If you make inappropriate spelling changes from British to non-British (or vice versa) it could lead to blocking as disruptive editing. Thank you. Edison (talk) 02:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing: making inappropriate changes from one variant of English to another contrary to WP:ENGVAR after a warning. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Edison (talk) 03:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

.

[edit] Proposed deletion of "Job's comforter"

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article "Job's comforter", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ~ Eóin (talk) 02:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)