Talk:Prince William Forest Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prince William Forest Park article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Virginia because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Virginia}} template, removing the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

This article is part of WikiProject Protected Areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected areas worldwide. It may include the protected area infobox.

[edit] Still a stub

This article has two sections and three photos. Is it still really a stub? Thoughts? Mmoyer 03:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] sasquatch

• NESRA Sasquatch viewing area. ^[1]

I removed this, because honestly it hardly seems appropriate.

1) NESRA (the sasquatch people) have nothing to do with the park, and there is no NESRA presence (bigfoot viewing facilities, guided tours, etc.) in the part.

2) This is such a trivial part of such an extreme fringe that it doesn't bear mentioning. I'm all for including minority viewpoints and little known facts in the wikipedia, but even by bigfoot hunter standards, this is minor to the point of irrelevance. If they claim to turn up any kind of evidence, or draw some media attention, it should be reinstated by all means.